|
|||
Compared with Waves API560 and TD wins in all aspects
http://www.tritonedigital.com/index.php?page=shop.product_de tails&product_id=13&category_id=1&flypage=flypage.tpl&option =com_virtuemart&Itemid=19&vmcchk=1&Itemid=19 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Member: #39081 | ||
|
|||
isn't that one IR based? ---- Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 May 2002 Member: #2696 | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Member: #39081 | ||
|
|||
It's great to see them putting out more stuff! I hope Hydratone is coming. ---- ![]() |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Member: #5913 Location: Vancouver, Canada | ||
|
|||
From what I remember from the early (Win) Pluggo days of this plugin, it indeed was the best sounding API emu at the time. I actually remember how disappointed I was when, after hearing this one, I went to check the Waves API and realized how it didn't even come close to the real character of the unit. Even the URS one had more character than the Waves version!
Having said that, the Tritone one had values which were very "Lo-res", quite roughly stepped (.5 db IIRC?). IMO, this made it not as useful as it could've been. Some kind of interpolation could have been used to address this. Is this changed in the new version? Btw, pity they discontinued Windows development. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 16 Feb 2003 Member: #5959 | ||
|
|||
maxxxter wrote: From what I remember from the early (Win) Pluggo days of this plugin, it indeed was the best sounding API emu at the time. I actually remember how disappointed I was when, after hearing this one, I went to check the Waves API and realized how it didn't even come close to the real character of the unit. Even the URS one had more character than the Waves version!
Having said that, the Tritone one had values which were very "Lo-res", quite roughly stepped (.5 db IIRC?). IMO, this made it not as useful as it could've been. Some kind of interpolation could have been used to address this. Is this changed in the new version? Btw, pity they discontinued Windows development. this native version is stepped by 0.1db |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Member: #39081 | ||
|
|||
maxxxter wrote: pity they discontinued Windows development. Uh, yeah. It almost annoys me. Colortone and Hydratone are two plugs very high on my 'damn shame' list. They are amazing, but so fuct that they are difficult to use. I struggled with Colortone for a long time, and have since given up on it. Its so damn nice, and so damn buggy. Were they ever bug free on any PC system/host? Its been a few years, and people have really really wanted Colortone to work. It sucks to see that they will finally be bug-free, on Macs. Id prolly be using Colortone on every project somewhere if it worked. Hydratone isnt even listed on their site at all anymore? Colortone vs. Waves NLS...? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Jun 2004 Member: #30878 | ||
|
|||
maxxxter wrote: Btw, pity they discontinued Windows development.
+1 ---- "Time makes fools of us all. Our only comfort is that greater shall come after us." Eric Temple Bell http://thetomorrowfile.bandcamp.com/ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Member: #9515 |
| KVR Forum Index » Effects | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group







