|
|||
Yeah but I'm barely a musician |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
braj wrote: Where's your stash of tunes?
Ha. I do play a little keys and bass, very little of both and more "little" of the latter. I really enjoy mixing primarily but rarely find people willing to pay to do it right, so too much of it is compromised in some way, if just by time. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Member: #50422 | ||
|
|||
LawrenceF wrote: braj wrote: Where's your stash of tunes?
Ha. I do play a little keys and bass, very little of both and more "little" of the latter. I really enjoy mixing primarily but rarely find people willing to pay to do it right, so too much of it is compromised in some way, if just by time. 'Come Back' is cool |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
That's not me doing any singing, rapping or anything, on any of that music (or anywhere else really). The performer on that track is a guy named Andre. I replaced his original music track, produced all new music for that song.
He submitted it for a "group mix" on the S1 forum and I wasn't really feeling the original music, so I just kept the vocals and did new music. He's a pretty talented guy. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Member: #50422 | ||
|
|||
Grr... not Studio One's fault, but Melodyne is having some issue becoming registered. On my main machine I'm running a 30 day Editor trial, so it can't take the code there, but on my laptop when I run the licenser, it tells me Code28: license already upgraded. Anyone have any clue about this? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
OK Celemony gave me a new code for V2, so no worries about Melodyne. And Pattern Arp Plus works now, the developer is really helpful and tracked it to a permissions issue on my computer, so no more rewiring Reaper for me I'm still wondering about RAM memory usage, I thought CPU would be the limiting factor but it really seems memory usage is my biggest concern performance-wise. It seems if I leave S1 unattended (like overnight) eventually it will run out of memory, this is not with a huge memory load either, I think there probably is a memory leak somewhere. Closing/reopening resolves any memory issues so for a session it isn't really an issue, just an overall concern. I'm turning auto-save back on since that doesn't look to be an issue and I like the feature. If anyone has any tips about S1 and RAM please let me know. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
aMUSEd wrote: I thought S1 was supposed to be simple but my first attempt to actually create an album project is becoming a bit of a chore. I have ten tracks, all different lengths, each one is basically one song. But when I try and export to stems it keeps exporting them at 5 minutes each which means half of them have long strips of silence. Why can't it tell how long each track is? I just want it to export each audio clip so I can make the ten tracks I have into the ten songs in the project.
Don't know if you got your answer - but open the 'marker track' and move the end marker to the end of your song. S1 automatically sets the song length at 5mins unless you change it. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Nov 2009 Member: #220186 | ||
|
|||
Well after about a month with Studio One, I'm pretty happy I switched. I would say though that a couple weaknesses are like pebbles in my show:
1. an immature piano roll (but I'm sure it will mature, not a broken one either) 2. Some memory management issues that have workarounds and hopefully upcoming fixes, mostly an issue while I'm still on 32 bit. It is an extremely nice DAW that it pretty coherent and easy to use, not exactly 'not needing a manual' like some claimed to me along the way I was initially concerned about CPU use since my very first demo on V2 was horrible in that regard were put to rest and from my experience CPU use is nice and low, near Reaper so anyone that heard CPU was an issue can scratch that off any 'con' list. So to answer my own question now that I'm better oriented, to me the big strengths are: Coherent attractive GUI Stability Nice included and integrated effects Mastering system for Pro Melodyne integration Good preset system and browser Sounds as good as any other host Nothing that causes extreme frustration (yet!) |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
braj wrote: I was initially concerned about CPU use since my very first demo on V2 was horrible in that regard were put to rest and from my experience CPU use is nice and low, near Reaper so anyone that heard CPU was an issue can scratch that off any 'con' list. Hmmmmmm. I own studio one and I don't have that experience. Kontakt is still completely unusable and things like amp sims are brutal. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
Maybe it has something to do with the audio interface being used, with my system Kontakt is fine, the included amp sim is fine, and Guitar Rig is fine. I use Line6's PodFarm though (well-matched to my soundcard) and my interface is a guitar-centric one, but everything has no noticeable difference in comparison to Reaper other than using more RAM than I would like). But that is more the way S1 manages RAM and it doesn't render any plugin unusable by any stretch from my experience. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
We went through everything. It was widely reported. Presonus made some attempts at the time. NI made NONE. It wasn't long after it happened that the subject just disappeared......really have no idea if the issue was resolved.
Anyways, sorry to spam, I just get frustrated. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
hibidy wrote: We went through everything. It was widely reported. Presonus made some attempts at the time. NI made NONE. It wasn't long after it happened that the subject just disappeared......really have no idea if the issue was resolved.
Anyways, sorry to spam, I just get frustrated. No worries |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
braj wrote: Well after about a month with Studio One, I'm pretty happy I switched. I would say though that a couple weaknesses are like pebbles in my show:
1. an immature piano roll (but I'm sure it will mature, not a broken one either) 2. Some memory management issues that have workarounds and hopefully upcoming fixes, mostly an issue while I'm still on 32 bit. It is an extremely nice DAW that it pretty coherent and easy to use, not exactly 'not needing a manual' like some claimed to me along the way I was initially concerned about CPU use since my very first demo on V2 was horrible in that regard were put to rest and from my experience CPU use is nice and low, near Reaper so anyone that heard CPU was an issue can scratch that off any 'con' list. So to answer my own question now that I'm better oriented, to me the big strengths are: Coherent attractive GUI Stability Nice included and integrated effects Mastering system for Pro Melodyne integration Good preset system and browser Sounds as good as any other host Nothing that causes extreme frustration (yet!) ---- MuLab 4, Studio One v2. In that order. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 30 May 2006 Member: #108991 Location: US / Italy | ||
|
|||
braj wrote: hibidy wrote: We went through everything. It was widely reported. Presonus made some attempts at the time. NI made NONE. It wasn't long after it happened that the subject just disappeared......really have no idea if the issue was resolved.
Anyways, sorry to spam, I just get frustrated. No worries That's why I hate all the hosts |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
hibidy wrote: braj wrote: hibidy wrote: We went through everything. It was widely reported. Presonus made some attempts at the time. NI made NONE. It wasn't long after it happened that the subject just disappeared......really have no idea if the issue was resolved.
Anyways, sorry to spam, I just get frustrated. No worries That's why I hate all the hosts Yeah 'what works for you' is literal, not figurative. Sometimes some issues may just get in the way of someone's system while a thousand others never have the same issue. It could come down to so many factors we would never even consider, like some peripheral software installed on our system that we would never guess is causing some conflict. Even switching systems may not resolve things. But with Reaper i think it is the AWS extension's groove implementation that is causing some issues for me, i tried to use it and got a couple crashes. I really want to see Reaper mature in certain areas, and same with Studio One. I'm not selling either anytime soon though, they are the only two I own currently and it is never good to put all your eggs in one basket. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 |
| KVR Forum Index » Hosts (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.) | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group






