|
|||
LeVzi wrote: Turn up in a DIVA thread and advertise Saurus ! lol I bet that would go down well.
I've had more than enough opportunity to do so in the past, but I won't do it. It's just not the morally correct thing to do. advertise or mention? If you claim to be advertising it might look like you work for that company, or at most aspire to. Of all the chat around here recently, the only thing that gives that company a bad smell is YOU Its a shame as M & B are nice guys, too nice to tell some ppl to keep it zipped |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Oct 2001 Member: #1189 Location: England | ||
|
|||
LeVzi wrote: Turn up in a DIVA thread and advertise Saurus ! lol I bet that would go down well.
I've had more than enough opportunity to do so in the past, but I won't do it. It's just not the morally correct thing to do. You keep saying the word "advertising". At most, mentioning Diva in this thread is a fun little poke. See post #5 from "djanthonyw". For somebody, such as myself, interested in a complete picture of Saurus, for example, I want to hear opinions of it in relation to other synths that I'm also familiar with. What are the strengths of this, the wekanesses of that, why should I demo Saurus, why should I revisit the MM demo after a couple of years, or not, or whatever. It's not about "advertising". These synths and the companies that provide them need no additional marketing in these parts… they're all well known in this little corner of the software world. It's simply a technical discussion about software synthesis, and moreso: a hands-on, paractical technical discussion between some folks who have used it all, can compare to this or that hardware unit, likes this filter or that CPU optimization, or whatever... The OP may only care about Saurus and MM, and gotten his/her answer on or by page 1 or 2, but that doesn't mean the next 2-3 pages can't contain civil, practically-based discussion of MM, Saurus, Diva, Sytrus, or whatever the hell else anybody wants to compare and contrast. EDIT: and I should add: I appreciate the technical discussion amongst those that do have the hands-on, practical experience. It's one of the things that makes this forum valuable to me. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Sep 2004 Member: #40510 | ||
|
|||
Kriminal wrote: LeVzi wrote: Turn up in a DIVA thread and advertise Saurus ! lol I bet that would go down well.
I've had more than enough opportunity to do so in the past, but I won't do it. It's just not the morally correct thing to do. advertise or mention? If you claim to be advertising it might look like you work for that company, or at most aspire to. Of all the chat around here recently, the only thing that gives that company a bad smell is YOU Its a shame as M & B are nice guys, too nice to tell some ppl to keep it zipped Isn't mentioning and advertising exactly the same thing ? Of course it is. Person X : Hey I am interested in Synth A and B Person Y : Yes they are both good synths, A is good at this, and B is good at that. Person Z : Synth C is better than A + B <<< Advertising Oh it's obvious how people word things to mask it all, "Oh I just thought i'd mention it, it is relavent" but it isn't at all is it. And as for giving a bad impression, I dunno why anyone would think that, I don't work for Tone2 never have, so all my views are my own. Tough pill to swallow that one ain't it son. ---- Forward ever, Backward never |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Jul 2008 Member: #184424 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK | ||
|
|||
kbaccki wrote: LeVzi wrote: Turn up in a DIVA thread and advertise Saurus ! lol I bet that would go down well.
I've had more than enough opportunity to do so in the past, but I won't do it. It's just not the morally correct thing to do. You keep saying the word "advertising". At most, mentioning Diva in this thread is a fun little poke. See post #5 from "djanthonyw". For somebody, such as myself, interested in a complete picture of Saurus, for example, I want to hear opinions of it in relation to other synths that I'm also familiar with. What are the strengths of this, the wekanesses of that, why should I demo Saurus, why should I revisit the MM demo after a couple of years, or not, or whatever. It's not about "advertising". These synths and the companies that provide them need no additional marketing in these parts… they're all well known in this little corner of the software world. It's simply a technical discussion about software synthesis, and moreso: a hands-on, paractical technical discussion between some folks who have used it all, can compare to this or that hardware unit, likes this filter or that CPU optimization, or whatever... The OP may only care about Saurus and MM, and gotten his/her answer on or by page 1 or 2, but that doesn't mean the next 2-3 pages can't contain civil, practically-based discussion of MM, Saurus, Diva, Sytrus, or whatever the hell else anybody wants to compare and contrast. EDIT: and I should add: I appreciate the technical discussion amongst those that do have the hands-on, practical experience. It's one of the things that makes this forum valuable to me. That's quite true, but unfortunately that's never how it works around here. THe two synths were questioned, and someone felt the need to belittle them both and bring up another one, prompting others to do similar. ---- Forward ever, Backward never |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Jul 2008 Member: #184424 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK | ||
|
|||
edited ---- "Atmospheric Transients" for PPG Wave 3.V "Analog vs Digital" for Blofeld http://soundcloud.com/ingoweidner Last edited by Ingonator on Mon May 28, 2012 11:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Member: #176645 Location: Hannover, Germany | ||
|
|||
Kvr needs a resident psychiatrist. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
braj wrote: Kvr needs a resident psychiatrist.
What are you trying to say ? ---- Forward ever, Backward never |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Jul 2008 Member: #184424 Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK | ||
|
|||
braj wrote: Kvr needs a resident psychiatrist.
What KVR needs is fewer aggressive shills. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 Jul 2009 Member: #210853 | ||
|
|||
LeVzi wrote: braj wrote: Kvr needs a resident psychiatrist.
What are you trying to say ? I'm not "trying to say" anything I said it without trying very hard, it was easy :p Some people are pathological, we see it over and over and you can just feel the need for them to get some help dripping off ever word in their posts :shrug; I'm not excluding myself either |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
KBSoundSmith wrote: braj wrote: Kvr needs a resident psychiatrist.
What KVR needs is fewer aggressive shills. Hey, that sounded pretty aggressive and a little shilly! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
edited ---- "Atmospheric Transients" for PPG Wave 3.V "Analog vs Digital" for Blofeld http://soundcloud.com/ingoweidner Last edited by Ingonator on Mon May 28, 2012 11:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Member: #176645 Location: Hannover, Germany | ||
|
|||
LeVzi wrote: Person X : Hey I am interested in Synth A and B Person Y : Yes they are both good synths, A is good at this, and B is good at that. Person Z : Synth C is better than A + B <<< Advertising That is not advertising, that is the persons opinion and they are free to state it and I have seen more than one occasion where exactly this happened and person X came back and said thanks for the suggestion and purchased synth C It may also be in this case that person Z said that to stir the pot. I do not know their motivation in this case. If that is the case, just ignore it. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Member: #56776 Location: in the wilds | ||
|
|||
Ingonator wrote: What i am more worried about is that why people like me and LeVzi who are more or less experienced Saurus users (and Tone2 beta testers) should hold back in a thread about Saurus and Minimonsta while those who usually don't really care about Saurus (e.g. pdxindy and braj) do think they could derail the thread by turning my words against me or better use every drop of the name "Diva" (no matter in which context) to slowly start another flame war (just remember your car comparisons, braj...).
Ingo J was only correcting the mistaken notion Diva was an ocean liner. Don't try and twist my words now |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
We are not mods here, the mods are. From what I see when we try to make it our business to tell others what to think and what to post, we incur a relevant reaction. I really don't know why this all has to be so messy, can't we all get along? Sometimes I think some people sense of humor generator is broken. Anyhow I'm working on having a better signal to noise ratio because I know I can be part of the problem, but what do they say? Acknowledging you have a problem is the first step to recovery? Anyhow I'm expecting this whole thing to be locked soon. Too bad because it was going nicely for a while. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
edited ---- "Atmospheric Transients" for PPG Wave 3.V "Analog vs Digital" for Blofeld http://soundcloud.com/ingoweidner Last edited by Ingonator on Mon May 28, 2012 11:05 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Member: #176645 Location: Hannover, Germany |
| KVR Forum Index » Instruments | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
















