|
|||
[quote="Examigan"] GeorgeZ wrote: Awesome. You'll love it mate
Thanks George, looking forward to making new music with it, and some presets too. This weekend will just be getting used to what it can do sound-wise, and a lot of reading from the manual. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Member: #81281 Location: Connecticut, USA | ||
|
|||
Removed, not worth another flame war. The OP already bought saurus. ---- GAS |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 May 2010 Member: #230948 | ||
|
|||
xamido wrote: Once in the mix you won't notice and say oh i know that sound is made in diva or saurus or minimonsta.
Well, it's an argument that I've used myself. It depends a lot on the genre in which you're working. Basically any electronic music genre that relies on hitting the audience over the head with over-compressed slabs of sound... yeah, in these cases, it doesn't matter whether it's Diva or Poizone or Saurus or Bontempi (if you wanna go hardware). If you're doing prog, for example... or Berlin School, or acoustic-electronic hybrids, using mixes that let the instruments breathe... hell, yes, it matters. And you can hear the difference. Whether or not the audience cares about that... who cares? Do I really want to base my aesthetic/artistic decisions on what someone who's already lost his hearing in da clubs thinks? Last edited by ariston on Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:17 am; edited 2 times in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Jun 2009 Member: #210358 Location: in a one-story town | ||
|
|||
Done ---- GAS Last edited by xamido on Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:17 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 May 2010 Member: #230948 | ||
|
|||
Done. But you quoted me in full, so you have to remove the "offending" last two sentences in your post yourself. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Jun 2009 Member: #210358 Location: in a one-story town | ||
|
|||
ariston wrote: Done. But you quoted me in full, so you have to remove the "offending" last two sentences in your post yourself.
Done ---- GAS |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 May 2010 Member: #230948 | ||
|
|||
xamido wrote: I find kvr fascination with analog to be pretentious. Once in the mix you won't notice and say oh i know that sound is made in diva or saurus or minimonsta.
That is a completely fair point, but you are off the mark when you say in a mix it won't matter... It might not matter for some backing synths, but if you are talking about a lead or a synth breakdown then it really can make more of a difference. People just want the VSTi's to sound as good as possible, and if that's in comparison to the 'analog' version then it's completely reasonable imo. In this type of thread it's not really just VA, but VA emulation area - so even more reason it's a valid comprison. Of course you can make really great sounding records with just the stuff free on CM magazine, or freebies you can download. And of course time would be better spend making music that arguing the toss over which of the many VSTi VAs sound a bit better than the others (DIVA ftw, especially for vintage!!). There is of course lots of stuff that sounds great on its own merits even if it doesn't compare well the the 'real' analog. And tons of other stuff from Msssive, Absynth through to Alchemy that you pretty much can;t do in hardware at all.... So... in this vintage VA case, it's valid to compare to Analog - the advantages of which can be clearly heard even in youtube videos. i.e. look up vidoes of a synthex and compared to the VSTi, or Aalto compared to a buchla - and you'll see there is still a pretty big way to go. . |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Member: #65751 | ||
|
|||
Ingonator wrote: Examigan wrote: GeorgeZ wrote: Awesome. You'll love it mate
Thanks George, looking forward to making new music with it, and some presets too. This weekend will just be getting used to what it can do sound-wise, and a lot of reading from the manual. As a customer you could also register to the Tone2 forum: http://www.tone2.org/forum/index.php?action=register You'll need your order number for it. Ingo Thanks Ingo I just signed up for the forum this morning, and I logged in for the first time a few minutes ago. You'll probably see me post something on there pretty soon. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Sep 2005 Member: #81281 Location: Connecticut, USA | ||
|
|||
I was just trying the Firebird demo and noticed a very nice feature to hide the keyboard, and checked the Saurus demo for the same but can't fine one, am I missing something? If it isn't there now, this would be a nice feature in a future revision to have. BTW I'm really liking Firebird a lot |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
Yup, been a Firebird fan for ages! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 May 2009 Member: #208349 Location: New Zealand | ||
|
|||
GeorgeZ wrote: Yup, been a Firebird fan for ages!
Besides the sound, I really liked the compact GUI for Firebird, the ability to hide the KB, and the selection of skins. One strange thing about all the KBs on Tone2 synths though is they don't reflect the midi output like most other plugins, so the keyboards are not very useful (I use a utility to transpose and impose scales, so it is handy to have a keyboard on a synth for reference). Also Saurus' KB still has that weird grainy compressed JPG look to it. IMO it would look much nicer if they just removed the KB. The standalone has a KB that can be brought up which is more full-featured, if they could make that the one in the plugin it would be much better, no wasted space and a KB available if you need it. I was 'this close' to buying Firebird (used) but Corona went on sale so i snapped that up, it also beat out Saurus for my personal tastes, was 'this close' to getting Saurus too. I was 'this close' to being a Tone2 customer Minimonsta is getting a good little workout in the Ohmstudio beta BTW |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
braj wrote: Also Saurus' KB still has that weird grainy compressed JPG look to it. IMO it would look much nicer if they just removed the KB.
I've played with the Saurus demo quite a bit... the mod matrix is too small and fiddly and 3 pages is ridiculous. I would much rather have an option to display all the mod matrix in one page where the KB is. A bit bigger and all at once. Especially on the Mac version, the GUI still feels like it is in the beta process. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Member: #56776 Location: in the wilds | ||
|
|||
memorymoon |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 May 2012 Member: #281292 | ||
|
|||
pdxindy wrote: braj wrote: Also Saurus' KB still has that weird grainy compressed JPG look to it. IMO it would look much nicer if they just removed the KB.
I've played with the Saurus demo quite a bit... the mod matrix is too small and fiddly and 3 pages is ridiculous. I would much rather have an option to display all the mod matrix in one page where the KB is. A bit bigger and all at once. Especially on the Mac version, the GUI still feels like it is in the beta process. Yeah it is a little ironic since the first thing we were able to see was the GUI. the KB just looks bad, drags down all the other nicer GUI elements. I agree that it would have been better to save the space for the mod matrix. I could see the matrix spanning the whole bottom area where the KB is, and have a multi-column patch browser maybe integrated there as well. The KB just kills the looks though much freeware looks better, let alone the functionality that is compromised. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
Gladiator is on sale in the market for 65 Euros. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 |
| KVR Forum Index » Instruments | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group















