Plug-ins, Hosts, Apps,
Hardware, Soundware
Developers
(Brands)
Videos Groups
Whats's in?
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Music Search
KVR
   
KVR Forum » Effects
Thread Read
Analog in the Box W7395EQ
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
kmonkey
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:52 pm reply with quote
Nighthawk77 wrote:

Of course sonically is ALWAYS a matter of taste so that remains relative.
But, when you have to chain several copies of Nebula back to back in order to get 3 or 4 bands of EQ you are going to degrade the audio quality.
Nebula will be adding additional noise and phase per copy so mutable copies being used to achieve multiple bands is inherently self defeating.

Companies like Waves, UAD, Softube, IKMultimedia who offer plugins that model multiple aspects of the hardware they are emulating (ie: transformers, tubes, switches, etc.),
are able to reproduce much more accurate reproductions of the original hardware without the additional noise and phase NOT inherent in the original device.

Simply the way Nebula deals with audio suffers from some problems.
UAD for example have been in business since the 1940's engineering some of the finest hardware tools ever made.
Their emulations of hardware they originally designed is much closer then many of the other emulations available.
Waves are also extraordinarily good.

They are also using a completely tried and tested technology that does not inherently suffer from the same problems that Nebula does.
Really it comes down to the end result and how the final mix reproduces on multiple systems.

It would be interesting to know how many major producers prefer Nebula over Waves, UAD, Softube, somehow I don't think you will find that many.

Having said that, Nebula is capable of some interesting results when used sparingly.
In terms of dealing with dynamics, it can never really compare to top notch VST plugins, the technology is currently limited in this way.

Fortunately they offer a free version, do you can do your own tests.....

Nebula self defeating by adding additional noise and phase per copy??Dude what are you smoking?? You should watch more closely when choosing your tea leaves.

Or better to ask can you give us simple, really simple evidence on this. Because many people did test and yet noone found anything on that nonsense you just mentioned.

Nighthawk77 wrote:

Many people have never used hardware vintage equipment like Pultecs, Fairchilds, SSL, Studer, etc so they will never really know the difference.
Having worked with these tools, my ears tell me that the Waves, UAD, Softube, IKMultimedia versions are MUCH closer to the originals without the added inaccuracies inherent in the Nebula process.


Ouuu you are very happy by having access to all these mighty tools.

There is Fairchild for nebula? Wow where? I would like to know where did you find it and how did you compared it then?

What kind of ears you sport? I think you just pissed on yourself, probably making it up about having access to all these tools (especially fairchild for Nebula). I don't know have you been in coma for the last two years but there are dozen of threads on gearslutz, KVR and even over at UAD forum (since you mentioned it) where a lot of people (producers, musicians, whatever) joined several blind test and it turned that in many cases they prefered nebula over UAD. Yes studer and manley test. Yes long time UAD users preferred Nenula over UAD. Just use search button. Add to that many threads where people experienced sort of revelation when using nebula (especially as EQ). For your record i have never seen threads with regards to something spectacular, or anything alike for plugs coming from some brands you mentioned. Go figure. Surely you don't think that all these people are stupid, without any experience or something. In case you think i am pulling this from my a** go and check these forums.

p.s. i own nebula yes, as well as uad quad, powercore etc.etc..Just to clarify that you can not say that my opinion is biased or that i am fanboy of some brand because i am not. I just don't like nonsense that's all.

Sweet lord can you tell us what is "completely tried and tested technology" which waves, ik multimeda, softube etc. use - please elaborate. I hope it's not some kind of albino polar bear or something.. Shocked
^ Joined: 16 Aug 2004  Member: #37337  
bmanic
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 6:01 pm reply with quote
Nighthawk77 wrote:

UAD for example have been in business since the 1940's engineering some of the finest hardware tools ever made.
Their emulations of hardware they originally designed is much closer then many of the other emulations available.


.. or so they would like to have you believe. Having used several different Manley Massive Passives I was pretty disappointed in the UAD version. However, the one from analogueinthebox.com and the few bands I sampled myself with Nebula was much, MUCH closer to the sound and behavior I'm used to hearing.

I also remember all the rave and circle-jerking going on at the UAD forums when they first released their pultec. Some of us criticized it for not being a good emulation as it behaved nothing at all like a tube unit does. Got almost murdered by the UAD mob, even though I had an UAD card myself.

Only now, many years later are people starting to realize just how much it takes to emulate analogue gear properly, especially the tube stuff. It. Is. Not. Easy.

UA is a brilliant at marketing, although I have to admit, they are finally starting to model the really relevant stuff in their latest plugins but what are the motivations of UA one might ask? To sell more of their underpowered hardware crap at 1k$+ a pop (costing them less than 100$ to make) for gullible users who still think UA is the only game in town?

IMHO when it comes to plugin DSP magic, Michael Massberg is the name to look out for. Thus currently Brainworx has an ace up their sleeve and a magic touch that I haven't seen elsewhere. Their Elysia Alpha compressor, Xpressor and now Vertigo VCS-1 plugins are amazingly detailed and authentic sounding (I've used all the corresponding hardware units in question). They still sound a bit "pluginish" but that might be pure placebo on my part.

I agree with you about the limitations of the volterra kernel way. It's the same problem that Sintefex/Focusrite encountered with their convolution thing. It is NOT a Nebula limitation which causes the 1-band only EQ dilemma, it is the CREATORS of the programs who have to deal with a very real and very serious limitation: Time and effort.

If you want to create a 3 band EQ with Q and Gain you are doing an exponential number of "sampling"! It takes a ridiculous amount of time to do the proper sampling. I talked with one of the Sintefex creators, Mike Kemp, a few years ago. He described the monstrous work behind sampling some of the more complex EQs in the FX2000 and FX8000 dynamic convolvers. It goes like this:

Set all knobs to unity/default -> Sample.
Turn 1 knob, 1 step -> sample and continue until that one knob is fully sampled throughout it's range.
Now move that 1 knob back to unity, turn the 2nd knob 1 step -> sample.
Now while keeping the 2nd knob in the first step, you sample the 1st knob AGAIN throughout it's whole range.
You continue like this until the 2nd knob has been completely sampled throughout it's range.
.. then there is the 3rd knob. Yeah. You probably understand the problem. Shit!

This is the only way to sample a unit properly, so that you do not get multiple passes through the unit. Sampling something like this is how it is done in the sintefex. They even wrote a specialized sampling software for this process only to keep all the tiny files organized! (they are tiny due to the short sampling process of the sintefex, only 2048 samples per convolution maximum, at least in the FX8000). Now the sintefex samples in about 30 seconds, so all those steps doesn't take a long time but still you end up using literally weeks, if not months sampling something like the Manley Massive Passive. Now imagine doing this with Nebula, using pristine sampling quality (meaning long sweeps, up to 120 seconds or more at 96kHz). Not only is it going to take for ever to do, it'll also be very hard to process. Actually I'm not sure what the limits of Nebula's NAT program is but surely there must be some when we start talking about hundreds of gigabytes of samples that need to be processed.

Also note that the more complex the sampling process is the more chance of user error there is. It's an excruciatingly complex process and sucks like nothing else!

Luckily Nebula has some clever features. You can have it linearize samples so that they do NOT degrade the audio at all. At least not the way AD/DA conversion can hurt. You can also provide clean versions with no harmonic distortion. Finally using this method you can force only 1 instance of your EQ to be the "full emulation" while still using several bands with clean versions.

I use nebula almost every day and the sonic benefits of the Volterra kernel engine is obvious, at least when it comes to EQs and preamps. I'm not entirely sold on the compressors or other processes that require faster response but for EQs it is pretty much unmatched in my opinion.. but each to their own. Smile

Cheers!
bManic
----
"He who asks is a fool for five minutes, he who does not ask remains a fool forever"
^ Joined: 03 Feb 2003  Member: #5744  Location: Finland, Espoo
analoguesamples909
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 6:59 pm reply with quote
Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:

if you see the list, there are a lot of cons, we are not blind. At the same time I think our product is worthing, and it's one of the best in the market, because pros are balanced with cons (especially soundwise).


Props for this lucid appraisal.

Honestly - Nebula for me is one of the only plugins that audibly does NOT generally degrade the signal through processing. So often I find plugins ultimately making something sound worse-loosing some life from the signal...but even with multiple instances - all you get is added colour - which honestly - ITB - is not a bad thing...
The technology is very well thought out with STONE etc and clever ways to overcome any issues.

Yes there are cons. Pros - are quite nice tho...

Yeah Ive owned UAD, Powercore etc and sold them. I use hardware compression now - Nebula for EQ and saturation - and a handful of Valhalla and other digital style plugins...thats it.
^ Joined: 28 Dec 2007  Member: #169279  
Grain Bastard
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:49 am reply with quote
[quote="analoguesamples909"]
Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:


Yeah Ive owned UAD, Powercore etc and sold them. I use hardware compression now - Nebula for EQ and saturation - and a handful of Valhalla and other digital style plugins...thats it.


And?????

Are you suggesting that you are right and all those people who are happy with their releases that have been made with equipment you have disgarded as inferior???? What about the people who paid to listen or dance to it?

No links to any website, music site or anything......
----
No, that Glitch is meant to be there.....
http://soundcloud.com/punisha
http://www.myspace.com/punishadubs
^ Joined: 02 Jan 2003  Member: #5234  Location: Staffs, UK
analoguesamples909
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:57 am reply with quote
Grain Bastard wrote:

Are you suggesting that you are right and all those people who are happy with their releases that have been made with equipment you have disgarded as inferior???? What about the people who paid to listen or dance to it?
No links to any website, music site or anything......


no Im not suggesting anything but my own preference and personal experience, and stating that Ive personally tried those things and settled on others. And on these forums for the time being I'd rather remain anonymous. Take that as you will.
^ Joined: 28 Dec 2007  Member: #169279  
Mirco AITB
KVRer
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 11:31 am reply with quote
Hello folks!

We're happy to announce that a release candidate for the Mac version of the plugin is released and ready to be tested right now.
We hope we can release the Mac version within a couple of days now.

A bug that could cause some weird phase behaviour or simply flip the phase
has been fixed in the v1.4 update for PC.



thanks for listening!
//analoginthebox.com Wink
----
www.analoginthebox.com

for support:
use our mail , use our internal forums & contact-form!
^ Joined: 14 Jul 2011  Member: #260650  
Mirco AITB
KVRer
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:21 pm reply with quote
A little reminder! We have a deal running today, just for a short time from now on! get the Plug-In for 50% off!!!

thanks for listening
----
www.analoginthebox.com

for support:
use our mail , use our internal forums & contact-form!
^ Joined: 14 Jul 2011  Member: #260650  
xtp
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:26 am reply with quote
Mirco AITB wrote:
A little reminder! We have a deal running today, just for a short time from now on! get the Plug-In for 50% off!!!

thanks for listening


I have been getting a ERROR 403 Forbidden msg when I try to access your site. I had assumed months ago it was no longer operating. How Strange.
^ Joined: 03 Jun 2006  Member: #109416  Location: The West Coast of New Zealand
Mirco AITB
KVRer
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:02 am reply with quote
hi folks,

please do not message us via PM here, if you need support.

for support please use:

support[- at - ]analoginthebox.com , use our internal forums on analoginthebox.com
or use the "Contact Support" option on our website!

thank you and have a nice weekend
----
www.analoginthebox.com

for support:
use our mail , use our internal forums & contact-form!
^ Joined: 14 Jul 2011  Member: #260650  
Mirco AITB
KVRer
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:06 am reply with quote
xtp wrote:
Mirco AITB wrote:
A little reminder! We have a deal running today, just for a short time from now on! get the Plug-In for 50% off!!!

thanks for listening


I have been getting a ERROR 403 Forbidden msg when I try to access your site. I had assumed months ago it was no longer operating. How Strange.


hi,

do you still have the problem?
----
www.analoginthebox.com

for support:
use our mail , use our internal forums & contact-form!
^ Joined: 14 Jul 2011  Member: #260650  
xtp
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:22 pm reply with quote
Mirco AITB wrote:
xtp wrote:

I have been getting a ERROR 403 Forbidden msg when I try to access your site. I had assumed months ago it was no longer operating. How Strange.


hi,

do you still have the problem?


Hi,

yes i just clicked your link and got the same msg. Nice big red 403.
^ Joined: 03 Jun 2006  Member: #109416  Location: The West Coast of New Zealand
Mirco AITB
KVRer
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:07 am reply with quote
hi all,

delamar.de and analoginthebox.com are giving you the chance to win the W735EQ Plug-in, by hearing the podcast today at 21:00 CET @ http://www.delamar.tv/

We wish you the best of luck Exclamation

----
www.analoginthebox.com

for support:
use our mail , use our internal forums & contact-form!
^ Joined: 14 Jul 2011  Member: #260650  
Mirco AITB
KVRer
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 3:29 am reply with quote
Hi all!

We lost the "Halbfinale" and so we will lower our prices by 50% on Sunday for the final match! For example the Mammoth EQ, the W735EQ Plug-In, the Germanos EQ Series and many more! Very Happy



www.analoginthebox.com
----
www.analoginthebox.com

for support:
use our mail , use our internal forums & contact-form!
^ Joined: 14 Jul 2011  Member: #260650  
macmurphy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 8:54 am reply with quote
hmm. i bought the w735eq but i can't find the serial file required to authorize it.

help! Help Wink

oh yeah, i'm on windows 7 btw.
^ Joined: 20 Jul 2004  Member: #33922  
Mirco AITB
KVRer
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:16 am reply with quote
macmurphy wrote:
hmm. i bought the w735eq but i can't find the serial file required to authorize it.

help! Help Wink

oh yeah, i'm on windows 7 btw.


hi,

please log-in on our site ("under MY AITB") and upload the W735EQ.ser-file, which you will find in your W735EQ VST-Folder. After that you need to download the *.aut (Authorization-File) and install it into the same folder. Please note that you have to run first the W735EQ to generate the *.ser-file in a host of your choice, it must be in admin-mode!

thanks!
----
www.analoginthebox.com

for support:
use our mail , use our internal forums & contact-form!
^ Joined: 14 Jul 2011  Member: #260650  
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Printable version
Page 3 of 4
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Display posts from previous:   
ReplyNew TopicPrevious TopicNext Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Username: Password:  
KVR Developer Challenge 2012