|
|||
AdmiralQuality wrote: Yep. My code comments often refer to "we". // next we check if... I'm in there!!! Though really by "we" I mean, me, the original author, and you (who is probably also me, just in the future) the poor bastard trying to figure out what the original author intended when he wrote it. Me too. But in my case it's like "me and my plugin" or "me and the computer"... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 27 Jun 2009 Member: #210283 Location: UK | ||
|
|||
martin_l wrote: AdmiralQuality wrote: Yep. My code comments often refer to "we". // next we check if... I'm in there!!! Though really by "we" I mean, me, the original author, and you (who is probably also me, just in the future) the poor bastard trying to figure out what the original author intended when he wrote it. Me too. But in my case it's like "me and my plugin" or "me and the computer"... Yeah, I mean that too. "Me and the CPU". When you're step debugging, that's exactly what it feels like.  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Member: #83902 Location: Toronto, Canada | ||
|
|||
AdmiralQuality wrote: martin_l wrote: AdmiralQuality wrote: Yep. My code comments often refer to "we". // next we check if... I'm in there!!! Though really by "we" I mean, me, the original author, and you (who is probably also me, just in the future) the poor bastard trying to figure out what the original author intended when he wrote it. Me too. But in my case it's like "me and my plugin" or "me and the computer"... Yeah, I mean that too. "Me and the CPU". When you're step debugging, that's exactly what it feels like. Actually "me and the virtual CPU" where the "virtual CPU" is common known as OS thread. I'm certainly not a geek.  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Member: #97939 Location: Helsinki, Finland | ||
|
|||
i thought i am the only one writing comments with "we" "now we increment this so that.."
thank god i'm not crazy (or not alone at least) ---- It doesn't matter how it sounds.. ..as long as it has BASS and it's LOUD! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Member: #118997 Location: 127.0.0.1 | ||
|
|||
I think you could also call it "we-passive" where "we" is used as a placeholder for a missing subject.  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Member: #97939 Location: Helsinki, Finland | ||
|
|||
I think the "we" is pretty common. I think all the code I've encountered professionally was either using "we" or not commented at all (and unfortunately, usually the latter  )---- Full-time Daddy and Software Developer Part-time Musician and Smartass Zero-time Intelligent Being |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Member: #137320 Location: in ur basement, codin ur programz | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Member: #83902 Location: Toronto, Canada | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Member: #83902 Location: Toronto, Canada | ||
|
|||
AdmiralQuality wrote: // I and I just being paranoid here... Denormal prevention? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Feb 2012 Member: #274678 Location: South - Africa |
| KVR Forum Index » DSP and Plug-in Development | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
