|
|||
whyterabbyt wrote: Lenticular wrote: Why don't you get a clue & realize this was written well over 2 years ago.
A clue about what? The longer ago it was written, the more that supports what I said... Clue : saying 'we intend to do X' two years ago still does not actually preclude abandoning the intention to do X. Quote: Maybe you will try to understand instead of trying to appear knowledgeable.
Says the guy who still can't understand that saying "we're going to do X" two years ago doesnt actually prove that doing Q has anything to do with X, or that it proves anything about whether X ever will be done. Im knowledgeable enough to know you're saying nothing of any merit here. You just don't get it, thick. I'm done. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Apr 2010 Member: #229353 | ||
|
|||
Lenticular wrote: whyterabbyt wrote: Lenticular wrote: Why don't you get a clue & realize this was written well over 2 years ago.
A clue about what? The longer ago it was written, the more that supports what I said... Clue : saying 'we intend to do X' two years ago still does not actually preclude abandoning the intention to do X. Quote: Maybe you will try to understand instead of trying to appear knowledgeable.
Says the guy who still can't understand that saying "we're going to do X" two years ago doesnt actually prove that doing Q has anything to do with X, or that it proves anything about whether X ever will be done. Im knowledgeable enough to know you're saying nothing of any merit here. You just don't get it, thick. I'm done. There's nothing to get, 'Einstein'. You're following up inane assertions with idiotic and incoherent nonsense. Byebye now. Write us all when you get a clue. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Sep 2001 Member: #1041 | ||
|
|||
Price aside I still wished this is an evolution of previous product rather than billing as a new one. "Different" doesn't mean much if I end up booting up the same one every time.
Hope the second new product isn't a lighter version of B2... I honestly don't see myself using that many reverbs from the same company, plus there's little incentive anyway at current crossgrade pricing (not bad imo, just not particularly enticing either). |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Sep 2008 Member: #188316 Location: US | ||
|
|||
Even a cursory demo of this says: this is not Aether 2.0. You'd have to take stuff out of Aether to get to B2 and, in any case, B2 is clearly aimed at more experimental uses of reverb (although some of those, ironically, tend to make for some very real-sounding spaces).
It's not like other reverbs (except perhaps ValhallaShimmer in some respects when it comes to the feedback paths). I guess you could use it to replace Breeze if you turned off one of the reverb engines but this thing is not exactly easy on the CPU. I haven't compared CPU use between Breeze and B2 yet. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Jun 2009 Member: #209020 Location: UK | ||
|
|||
I thought it sounded pretty good, I can see film composers and ambient musicians getting copies of this.
I already have enough reverbs and effects and I don't really have a need for something like this as I can recreate my own signal chains with what i have already. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Jul 2012 Member: #283583 | ||
|
|||
Gamma-UT wrote: Even a cursory demo of this says: this is not Aether 2.0. You'd have to take stuff out of Aether to get to B2 and, in any case, B2 is clearly aimed at more experimental uses of reverb (although some of those, ironically, tend to make for some very real-sounding spaces).
It's not like other reverbs (except perhaps ValhallaShimmer in some respects when it comes to the feedback paths). I guess you could use it to replace Breeze if you turned off one of the reverb engines but this thing is not exactly easy on the CPU. I haven't compared CPU use between Breeze and B2 yet. Thanks for pointing that out, if that's true then I stand corrected. Since Aether 2.0 will be an another paid upgrade I'm guessing the price will be more than $150.00 to get it plus B2 for current Aether owners? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Apr 2010 Member: #229353 | ||
|
|||
Let's move the B2 discussion to the other thread, where I have all the important info in the first post for new readers...
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=356483&start=1 5&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight= ---- Andrew Souter ____________________________ 2CAudio | www.2CAudio.com Galbanum | www.galbanum.com |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Member: #189147 | ||
|
|||
... ---- Cowbells! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Member: #50081 Location: Sydney, Australia | ||
|
|||
Lenticular wrote: Since Aether 2.0 will be an another paid upgrade I'm guessing the price will be more than $150.00 to get it plus B2 for current Aether owners?
Wow, good point, I better save my money for Aether 2! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Member: #38664 Location: Charlotte, NC USA | ||
|
|||
elipsis1 wrote: Lenticular wrote: Since Aether 2.0 will be an another paid upgrade I'm guessing the price will be more than $150.00 to get it plus B2 for current Aether owners?
Wow, good point, I better save my money for Aether 2! You'll have plenty of time. I hear they haven't even started working on it yet. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Apr 2010 Member: #229353 | ||
|
|||
keel wrote: billcarroll wrote: keel wrote: Hi,
What are the demo limitations? The limitations are legion 
Omfg. That is paranoid stuff. Those demo limitations, greedy pricing, ridiculous transfer fee.. no thanks. Keep your sh*t.. Ugh. What's with all the demos that restrict 96kHz.  ---- "Time makes fools of us all. Our only comfort is that greater shall come after us." Eric Temple Bell http://thetomorrowfile.bandcamp.com/ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Oct 2003 Member: #9515 |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
