Plug-ins, Hosts, Apps,
Hardware, Soundware
Developers
(Brands)
Videos Groups
Whats's in?
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Music Search
KVR
   
KVR Forum » Music Cafe
Thread Read
Hydra (ElectroProg - Seismic Exhumation)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
seismic1
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:22 am reply with quote
layzer wrote:
great toe tappin smorgasborg of sounds and rythms on this one, tim. kinda had
a bit of a kraftwerky sound with the filter Q clicks. (a sound i'll never get tired of)HiHi
and the random cello in there added some strangeness in a good way. cool, cool track Cool


Thanks very much for listening and commenting, Dave. Glad you liked it Smile I think those clicky percussion things were the last change I made to the track before mixing. They were originally a "clanky" cymbal-like sound.
^ Joined: 13 Mar 2009  Member: #203012  Location: UK
mr.me
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 2:51 pm reply with quote
I love cello, such a great sound...it works. Then an unexpected shift in sounds. You have the strangest sounds here, but they still seem to hold together.

Me likes!
Thanks for sharing!
^ Joined: 11 Feb 2003  Member: #5867  
D.H. Miltz
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 6:48 pm reply with quote
Really like the intro. The whole thing's quite nice, and I like the mix of sounds here. Enjoyed. Thank you.
^ Joined: 20 Jun 2008  Member: #183273  
seismic1
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:52 am reply with quote
mr.me wrote:
I love cello, such a great sound...it works. Then an unexpected shift in sounds. You have the strangest sounds here, but they still seem to hold together.

Me likes!
Thanks for sharing!


Thanks very much for checking this out mr.me. Glad you liked it Smile

I like "mixing it up" a bit. Whether it's genres or sounds. It's all good clean fun and should be encouraged wherever possible. The next one is a little more conventional in style. Ambient sounds but with a rhythmic base.
^ Joined: 13 Mar 2009  Member: #203012  Location: UK
seismic1
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:59 pm reply with quote
D.H. Miltz wrote:
Really like the intro. The whole thing's quite nice, and I like the mix of sounds here. Enjoyed. Thank you.


Thanks very much for checking this out and commenting DHM. Glad you liked it Smile

I enjoyed putting this together. When it came to the remix, I pushed it just a little further.
^ Joined: 13 Mar 2009  Member: #203012  Location: UK
seismic1
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:28 pm reply with quote
Final bump before remix itch onset Surprised
^ Joined: 13 Mar 2009  Member: #203012  Location: UK
Frantz
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:46 pm reply with quote
Another strong and varied composition. Love the cello intro.

As far as the mix goes, I think some sounds are a little too loud and upfront (dry). Personally I would have lowered certain sounds and added more reverb or other effects to get them to sit better in the mix.

It seems like all of your pieces are 6-7 minutes. Perhaps writing a shorter piece would be an interesting exercise for you?
^ Joined: 18 Jul 2008  Member: #185137  Location: New York
seismic1
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:27 am reply with quote
FrantzM wrote:
Another strong and varied composition. Love the cello intro.

As far as the mix goes, I think some sounds are a little too loud and upfront (dry). Personally I would have lowered certain sounds and added more reverb or other effects to get them to sit better in the mix.

It seems like all of your pieces are 6-7 minutes. Perhaps writing a shorter piece would be an interesting exercise for you?



Thanks very much for listening and commenting, FrantzM. I hope you liked it Smile

Mixwise, I was trying to do something a little different on here by opposing the more "natural" sounds with the more obvious electronic textures. Part of that was keeping the drum synth fairly high in the mix to contrast with the cello. I didn't put very much reverb on the drum synth. I thought it would make it "punchier". I might remix this again in a few months when I get my act together.

You are right. Most of my pieces are approx. 6-7 minutes. I think that's a comfort zone for me, although I have a couple of 12 minute pieces and a few 3-5 minute tracks on SoundCloud. I have just started remixing the next track. It's currently at 7:39. I invariably begin the process trying to shave off about a minute or so, and then find another bridge and the track grows again Sad

The next track certainly has a less "dry" sound.
^ Joined: 13 Mar 2009  Member: #203012  Location: UK
Frantz
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:54 pm reply with quote
seismic1 wrote:

Thanks very much for listening and commenting, FrantzM. I hope you liked it Smile


I really do like it. The cello part was memorable enough that I could hum it today from memory. This is a good sign.

seismic1 wrote:

Mixwise, I was trying to do something a little different on here by opposing the more "natural" sounds with the more obvious electronic textures. Part of that was keeping the drum synth fairly high in the mix to contrast with the cello. I didn't put very much reverb on the drum synth. I thought it would make it "punchier". I might remix this again in a few months when I get my act together.


The drums are not bothering me. One example would be the synth riff that starts at 0:59. I think it is a touch too dry and loud.

seismic1 wrote:

You are right. Most of my pieces are approx. 6-7 minutes. I think that's a comfort zone for me, although I have a couple of 12 minute pieces and a few 3-5 minute tracks on SoundCloud.


I am not just thinking about the constant length of your pieces but also their intricacy. I had a really interesting discussion about this with a friend many years ago. I came to the realization that most of my favorite tracks to listen to are incredibly simple but I was writing very elaborate pieces with complex arrangements and wasn't happy with them. It finally occurred to me that I didn't have the confidence at the time to go with simple ideas. Somehow I worked through that and I am writing much simpler stuff now and am happier with it. It may not be applicable to you but I thought I would share that for what it's worth.
^ Joined: 18 Jul 2008  Member: #185137  Location: New York
seismic1
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:08 am reply with quote
FrantzM wrote:
The cello part was memorable enough that I could hum it today from memory. This is a good sign.


...........insidiously creepin' into your consciousness...........

FrantzM wrote:
One example would be the synth riff that starts at 0:59. I think it is a touch too dry and loud.


It is dry and loud for sure. That was intentional and was in the original version of the track (June 2010). I guess familiarity had anaesthetised me.


FrantzM wrote:

I am not just thinking about the constant length of your pieces but also their intricacy. I had a really interesting discussion about this with a friend many years ago. I came to the realization that most of my favorite tracks to listen to are incredibly simple but I was writing very elaborate pieces with complex arrangements and wasn't happy with them. It finally occurred to me that I didn't have the confidence at the time to go with simple ideas. Somehow I worked through that and I am writing much simpler stuff now and am happier with it. It may not be applicable to you but I thought I would share that for what it's worth.


I think you make a good point. I find that shorter, simpler pieces present a different challenge, both in terms of composition and arrangement. I have thought about this and am not sure what will happen when I "get back in the saddle" sometime next year. All of the tracks I have put up here are remixes of old pieces. I'm trying to "close the book" on these, whilst retaining their original look and feel.

One project that I may become involved with might involve some "minimal techno". That could be interesting Shocked I doubt that it will remain so blissfully minimal after my contribution Sad
^ Joined: 13 Mar 2009  Member: #203012  Location: UK
Frantz
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:19 am reply with quote
seismic1 wrote:

It is dry and loud for sure. That was intentional and was in the original version of the track (June 2010). I guess familiarity had anaesthetised me.


If it was intentional, then it's a feature not a bug. Smile

seismic1 wrote:

I think you make a good point. I find that shorter, simpler pieces present a different challenge, both in terms of composition and arrangement. I have thought about this and am not sure what will happen when I "get back in the saddle" sometime next year. All of the tracks I have put up here are remixes of old pieces. I'm trying to "close the book" on


Since you are finishing pieces and they are coming out well, I don't think this is a big issue for you. I was abandoning pieces after putting in serious work on them and it became clear I needed to "reboot" my whole approach. Just thought I'd mention it because sometimes I listen to parts of your work and think, "Is this part necessary? Would it be stronger without this section?"
^ Joined: 18 Jul 2008  Member: #185137  Location: New York
seismic1
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 4:56 pm reply with quote
FrantzM wrote:

It seems like all of your pieces are 6-7 minutes. Perhaps writing a shorter piece would be an interesting exercise for you?


I've just finished the structural remixing of Itch. It started out at 7:38. I have it down to.....................6:32. Right in the middle of that zone again Smile
^ Joined: 13 Mar 2009  Member: #203012  Location: UK
Frantz
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:12 pm reply with quote
seismic1 wrote:

I've just finished the structural remixing of Itch. It started out at 7:38. I have it down to.....................6:32. Right in the middle of that zone again Smile


Yes, we all have our comfort zones. Smile
^ Joined: 18 Jul 2008  Member: #185137  Location: New York
Barnadine
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 5:29 pm reply with quote
Great clear mix. Love the gruff cello sections particularly. They give a pleasing rough edge to the smoothness elsewhere. Nice stuff.

seismic1 wrote:
I took some inspiration from XTC's "River Of Orchids" for that.

Ah, I can see that now.
^ Joined: 24 Mar 2002  Member: #2259  Location: Australia
seismic1
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:39 pm reply with quote
Barnadine wrote:
Great clear mix. Love the gruff cello sections particularly. They give a pleasing rough edge to the smoothness elsewhere. Nice stuff.

seismic1 wrote:
I took some inspiration from XTC's "River Of Orchids" for that.

Ah, I can see that now.


Thanks for checking this out and for commenting, Barnardine. Glad you liked it Smile

I just got hold of Miroslav Philharmonik. I've just had an idea for a possible future remix of this Shocked
^ Joined: 13 Mar 2009  Member: #203012  Location: UK
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Printable version
Page 3 of 3
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Display posts from previous:   
ReplyNew TopicPrevious TopicNext Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Username: Password:  
KVR Developer Challenge 2012