|
|||
Hello,
I have a little analysis question on the intro of the theme music for Rocky. I've always thought the second chord of the intro was really cool, but now that I try to analyze what it is, I'm kind of lost. If you look at this score: http://d29ci68ykuu27r.cloudfront.net/product/Look-Inside/lar ge/16347375_01.jpg It starts C major, and then the second chord I'm talking about is a Esus4, which lands on a D minor. You can listen to it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioE_O7Lm0I4 Well, now that I know what chords they are, I can be happy and leave it, but I'd like to have a better understanding of this. Why does this work? Have you seen anything like this in another song? If you had to write up a harmonic analysis of this intro, what would you have written? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 24 Sep 2009 Member: #216087 | ||
|
|||
neueliteratur wrote: the second chord I'm talking about is a Esus4,
Where did you get that from? ---- Unfamiliar words can be looked up in my Glossary of musical terms. Also check out my Introduction to Music Theory. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Oct 2004 Member: #44005 | ||
|
|||
JumpingJackFlash wrote: neueliteratur wrote: the second chord I'm talking about is a Esus4,
Where did you get that from? lol, I don't know why I read E A B E. But then, E B D E? I don't know what to call it, nor what degree it is! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 24 Sep 2009 Member: #216087 | ||
|
|||
well, it is E sus later, here in the intro he omits the a, but it still as some form of v of A.
You finally get the resolution to A at the very end. The fact he delays it by going to iv is why it still sounds 'fresh' I suppose. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 May 2003 Member: #7163 | ||
|
|||
I would analyze it as follows:
- C (I) at the beginning obviously - E7 (V/vi) at m. 5, omitting the G#. - Instead of going to Am (vi, the relative minor) at m. 9, it's a deceptive cadence and the Dm chord can be labelled as iv/vi = ii. That is, the Dm chord is iv in Am and ii in C. This actually happens in Imagine as well during the second chorus, where it goes F - G - C - E7 - F, but instead of E7 to Dm, it goes E7 - F. So it would be VI/vi = IV. This has roots going back to Schubert at least. And as a final point, another reason why this works is the stepwise motion of the bass: F - E - D - C, etc. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Apr 2012 Member: #278696 Location: Toronto, ON | ||
|
|||
Interesting, thank you. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 24 Sep 2009 Member: #216087 |
| KVR Forum Index » Music Theory | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group







