Thrillerseeker XTC or kush-audio clariphonic dsp ?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 754 posts since 20 Mar, 2010
hi guys
from what i can read here
both of these plugins are capable of adding some "like" and mojo to tracks or mixes
the big difference between them is also 149 euros!!
by the way,
for electronic music what would you suggest? and what is the main difference between them?
thanx
from what i can read here
both of these plugins are capable of adding some "like" and mojo to tracks or mixes
the big difference between them is also 149 euros!!
by the way,
for electronic music what would you suggest? and what is the main difference between them?
thanx
-
- KVRian
- 1126 posts since 3 Aug, 2004
I recommend you don't even think about stuff like that right now.
I have to tell that to myself again and again. But that's not what you wanted to hear, i guess. I'd put that money towards books or a Sonicacademy deal. Or something like that.
I have to tell that to myself again and again. But that's not what you wanted to hear, i guess. I'd put that money towards books or a Sonicacademy deal. Or something like that.
no sig
-
- KVRAF
- 14658 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Then read this post to find out the difference:Giusmex wrote:hi guys
from what i can read here
both of these plugins are capable of adding some "like" and mojo to tracks or mixes
the big difference between them is also 149 euros!!
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 35#5131435
Learn regular EQing first.Giusmex wrote: for electronic music what would you suggest? and what is the main difference between them?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 754 posts since 20 Mar, 2010
sure, i try to learn everything about eq everyday, i know it is one of the most powerful tool to shape sounds;
but i asked to you what you think about the differences between thrillerseeker XTC and clariphonic
thanx
but i asked to you what you think about the differences between thrillerseeker XTC and clariphonic
thanx
-
- KVRAF
- 14658 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Apples and Oranges really. XTC has three bands and variable frequencies compared to Clariphonic's fixed frequencies. Also XTC offers saturation per band, which is controlled globally by the MOJO section.
Both are parallel EQ's, just one's more flexible.
Both are parallel EQ's, just one's more flexible.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
so basically you are saying the freeware is more versatile.. so why not recommend to op to save the money
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 754 posts since 20 Mar, 2010
in fact, it is what i said before; there are 149 euros of difference
i cannot believe this entirely maybe they are simply different, although both use a saturation step in their process
but it seems true this time, the bootsie one seems more versatile
i cannot believe this entirely maybe they are simply different, although both use a saturation step in their process
but it seems true this time, the bootsie one seems more versatile
-
- KVRAF
- 1580 posts since 22 Apr, 2011 from The House of Zaid
Where can I download ThrillseekerXTC? I checked Bootsie's page but didn't see a link in the download section.
Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
- KVRAF
- 2138 posts since 8 Feb, 2007
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)
-
- KVRAF
- 14658 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Maybe the freeware is not his cup of tea? Can always happen. And the Mac crowd is pissed already.TheoM wrote:so basically you are saying the freeware is more versatile.. so why not recommend to op to save the money
You sure about that? Haven't tested the software version yet so I can't tell, but it's obviously apparent in the hardware version (overdrive the module, get some mojo in the process - as with every hardware).Giusmex wrote:i cannot believe this entirely maybe they are simply different, although both use a saturation step in their process
But one of Clariphonic DSP's features is actually:
"Incredible clarity, minimal distortion and phase artifacts"
Last edited by Compyfox on Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 4867 posts since 18 Dec, 2000
I really wish I could try out Thrillerseeker, but Clariphonic is like gold to me.
The extra sauce on my tracks.
dw
The extra sauce on my tracks.
dw
-
- Banned
- 147 posts since 4 Feb, 2012 from Carolina Beach
Bootsie's getting better and better every day.