I think that Reaper (there, I said it) isn't bad at all, but it does require some configuration to a person's preferences, which is also one of it's biggest strengths.

Since every KVR thread is a Reaper thread, we finally have one where it actually applies.

What about a bad kvr thread flow thread? I think this is one of the worst.

OR you could just use live and then that would be the best. Or that could be S1, or....

What I really hate is this DAW !!

Especially with this plugin.

Yes, this daw and this plugin suck.

"Worst DAW with a bad workflow is who?"

Margery DAW. Her workflow see-saws all the time.

Should have hired Johnny. He's cheap.

LMMS

Reaper is the worst.

To each their own, I say... My "vote" would go to "Live", as I just never been able to "get it".

I guess it depends on what kind of workflow is to your liking. It depends also on your background in music. I have a fully analog background: a console, hardware synths and samplers synced over MIDI, external FX... and I like all "Cubase like" DAWs. A tracker looks completely silly to me. Pattern based DAWs like "Live" also. Not being able to connect everything to anything seems silly to me, too. Not having multitimbral capable synths and samplers with multiple outputs in this day and age, also...

Stuff like that. btw. I use Reaper for about 5 years now. I've been a great fan of EnergyXT before Reaper [and still use v1.41 often], and I've been using Cubase for more than 10 years before that.

To someone, "Live" is absolutely gorgeous, and "Renoise", and the likes. I couldn't do shi* with them.

Hah epic response.
+1 to every "Cubase like" DAW (Which I like most)

some people don't like iTunes, but since I have been using it I sound just like all my favorite artists.

there is NO SUCH THING AS A BAD DAW-arggghhh...they all have their strong points,its entirely down to the users preference on which side of the fence he wants to piss on