by artificial; Tue Nov 29, 2011 11:16 am
by Ja.x; Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:51 pm
by Hermu; Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:42 pm
adding assignements for Loop, Next beat and Prior beat
toggle mode for Mute and Solo:
implemented Mute or Solo function needs a midi controller with button toggle functionality.
for low cost midi controllers with only CC on/off buttons functionality it's not possible to use Mute and Solo, because button press turn on Mute or Solo but button release turn it off. So it would be nice to implement a toggle functionality for first button press/release to turn Mute or Solo on and the next button press/release turn it off.
most low cost MIDI controllers supports also Mackie Control.
by nix808; Wed Mar 13, 2013 6:38 pm
I am using XT2.
I like it,
but we are going to need 64 bit IMO
That's about it for the request.
If I end up using it a lot,
I'll see what else I want
by DuX; Wed May 01, 2013 11:00 pm
Ja.x wrote:I don't want anything from XT2, except to see it buried and forgotten. On the other hand, wouldn't mind to see a XT3 based on the XT1 workflow, with proper multicore, 64 bits, mixer view, no more funny bugs, etc. That would do for me.
That. I still use EXT 1.41 But only for "sketching" and sometimes jamming. It really shines with live performances, at least for me. But Reaper is my main DAW. It used to be somewhat the other way around years ago when Reaper was at v0.9 and EnergyXT at v1.36. Well, times change... I was never able to use EXT 2 properly. Especially without multicore support. Lacking multicore processing hurts it badly in a very bad way.
Support for control surfaces like Faderport, Alphatrack, Mackie HUI... wouldn't be bad, either.
by Libondium; Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:20 pm Re: FEATURE REQUEST list - what do you want from energyXT2 ?
1.the whole Module Tab is a Bug (layering icons, track deleted vsti still in modular tab, no corresponding Values anyway) this Bug destoying the workflow and is still in beta version. If would work proper a bit like "Bidule" seems to work, it would be a great help.
2.all the unlogicall Bugs in the inbuild synth ( This Synth is one of the most comfortable, versatile and fastest to handle Synths ever)
3.and last but not least= Nowbody like to wait years before the developer discover their response to fix the Bugs. I Guess Energy's Batterys are very low and we should'nt expect more then they gave us before. Its just low Energy, but a bit better than no Air to breath.
Please Developer do your Job and make Energy to what it could be: The best DAW for Home or Projekt studio recording.
by seismic1; Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:16 pm Re: FEATURE REQUEST list - what do you want from energyXT2 ?
Libondium wrote:.... This Synth is one of the most comfortable, versatile and fastest to handle Synths ever....
I keep coming back to that synth. It is versatile and capable of so much.