Possibly a stupid question, but what are you monitoring the sub-bass with? If you don't have a wide-range, high power monitor system and a big room to allow those 35+ foot wavelengths some breathing space, hard to tell when you have enough sub-bass. Although, your next door neighbours might be able to tell you.padillac wrote:Would you say this applies mostly to mixing? As in, get the mix right without aiming for loudness, and then let a mastering engineer deal with the problem of making a sub-bassy tune loud? I know that's the general advice anyway but I'm asking specifically about the problem of getting sub-bass loud.bmanic wrote:So, your solution? Don't go for loudness and you can have all the sub bass in the world!
This just in! "When it comes to sub-bass, I hate all limiters."
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
-
- KVRian
- 746 posts since 27 Nov, 2011
well.....I have mackie hr824s which according to their specs go down to 39hz. The lowest note I ever put in my songs is an E which is at 41hz. That's the low E on an 88-key piano, as well as the low note on a bass.mandolarian wrote:Possibly a stupid question, but what are you monitoring the sub-bass with? If you don't have a wide-range, high power monitor system and a big room to allow those 35+ foot wavelengths some breathing space, hard to tell when you have enough sub-bass. Although, your next door neighbours might be able to tell you.padillac wrote:Would you say this applies mostly to mixing? As in, get the mix right without aiming for loudness, and then let a mastering engineer deal with the problem of making a sub-bassy tune loud? I know that's the general advice anyway but I'm asking specifically about the problem of getting sub-bass loud.bmanic wrote:So, your solution? Don't go for loudness and you can have all the sub bass in the world!
My room isn't treated so honestly I couldn't tell you wtf I'm hearing w/ the sub half the time. Mostly I'm just feeling it, making sure it has weight to it, and hope for the best. I've been told by two mastering engineers that it's easier for them to turn the sub up than turn it down, so they've said if anything I should err on a quieter sub so they can work with it more easily.
For parties, we rent an 18" subwoofer, so we have plenty of sub
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
Ah, ok. The 824s low bass doesn't loosen many teeth or smack with kidney-busting kick. They don't output a lot of energy in the lowest octave even with room gain. Maybe consider treating your room and adding a dedicated (non-party) sub.
Or as you say, just make it the mastering engineer's problem.
Or as you say, just make it the mastering engineer's problem.
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
-
- KVRist
- 485 posts since 21 Jun, 2010
thank you for this! now I can have something very similar to Renoise's Maximizer in Studio Onerifftrax wrote:Try loudmax
Really excellent for zero-distortion limiting on even the most formidable material. You'll lose a tiny bit of punch but it works where most limiters fail if you can accept that trade-off.
Awesome signature by the way ... lol
- KVRAF
- 10360 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
You can't. Period.padillac wrote:Would you say this applies mostly to mixing? As in, get the mix right without aiming for loudness, and then let a mastering engineer deal with the problem of making a sub-bassy tune loud? I know that's the general advice anyway but I'm asking specifically about the problem of getting sub-bass loud.bmanic wrote:So, your solution? Don't go for loudness and you can have all the sub bass in the world!
The more and deeper bass you have the more a limiter will choke on it or make it distort. There is no way around this fact. It's written in the unfortunate digital laws of ours.
Like I said earlier, there is only a compromise to be made. How loud do you need it? Then decide how much you can add bass. Or vice versa. Add as much bass as you need, then see how loud it gets. You can not have both massive amounts of subs and incredibly loud record. They are mutually exclusive.. that is unless you like a completely distorted mess.
If you have no problems with distortion then go as "loud" as you want. Perhaps some day we'll all listen to white noise.
Seriously though, I hope that we in the future have "intelligent" playback mediums that can automatically adjust track volume depending on material, so that everything plays at equal loudness no matter what. This is the only way to get rid of the loudness war. It'd get rid of it real quick too as the tracks that are not squashed to death would sound way more punchy and have much louder bass. There are virtually no negatives to having a track with lots of dynamic impact whereas there are massive losses to be had with squashing everything to death.
Cheers!
bManic
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
- KVRAF
- 2750 posts since 2 Feb, 2005 from Raincoast of Grayland
That would be brilliant! It really would be 21st century technology. Can we lobby to get it in the mp37 spec, so our great, great grandchildren can get the benefit of something that should have been implemented 15 years ago?bmanic wrote:Seriously though, I hope that we in the future have "intelligent" playback mediums that can automatically adjust track volume depending on material, so that everything plays at equal loudness no matter what. This is the only way to get rid of the loudness war. It'd get rid of it real quick too as the tracks that are not squashed to death would sound way more punchy and have much louder bass. There are virtually no negatives to having a track with lots of dynamic impact whereas there are massive losses to be had with squashing everything to death.
Cheers!
bManic
perception: the stuff reality is made of.
-
- KVRAF
- 2586 posts since 15 Jun, 2006
Isn't prol known for not messing with the low end.
I would think, the waves L3 and L16 would be good at preserving subs.
I'd like to know how they're getting the bottom end on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gcxp3hGVr-E
I would think, the waves L3 and L16 would be good at preserving subs.
I'd like to know how they're getting the bottom end on this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gcxp3hGVr-E
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
It's kinda sad to assume everyone'll be listening on earbuds and cheap PC speakers. 20-80Hz is the "power" range of frequencies. Even breakbeat/accoustic kicks can sound sterile to me when highpassed. It all depends whether you're going for bassy kick or bassy bassline obviously, but I'd leave at least *something* to fill out that region, because of it's psychological impact.Mushy Mushy wrote:This.Burillo wrote:i usually don't have sub-bass at all. HP everything below 55-60Hz.
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105824 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
and on that day i shall weep with joybmanic wrote:Perhaps some day we'll all listen to white noise.