Much like a PorticoCompyfox wrote:You know what would be great? If the compressor could be setup to "feed forward" or "feed back". Much like the old reaComp by Cockos.
F.
Give us the beta NOW. don't pack it... just send us the code !
Much like a PorticoCompyfox wrote:You know what would be great? If the compressor could be setup to "feed forward" or "feed back". Much like the old reaComp by Cockos.
Doing the best I can!Tp3 wrote:Give us the beta NOW. don't pack it... just send us the code !
Was kidding, of course...FabienTDR wrote:Doing the best I can!Tp3 wrote:Give us the beta NOW. don't pack it... just send us the code !
big fat +1FabienTDR wrote:Clean, accurate and aliasing free compression can actually sound fat and crispy like nothing else.
Very interesting. With that being the case I assume that means you prefer to add distortion/saturation on individual tracks versus on bus processing, to achieve a more musical sound with less IM?FabienTDR wrote: Well, an often overseen details is that the concept of harmonic distortion is purely theoretical in the context of complex signals such as music. As soon the input contains more than one frequencies (which is always the case for music), any harmonic distortion will appear "paired" with equivalent intermodulation distortion (unharmonic sum and difference products). The more frequencies in the original signal and the stronger the non-linearity, the more IM is produced. In the case of mastering, it's important to minimize any source of "harmonic distortion", because for complex signals, the distortion won't be very harmonic at all (even if we consider a 100% aliasing free non-linearity).
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement