
Nebula Presets | Nebulapresets
I may have lost my mind.
Total Studio 2 MAX - Download it now at special intro pricing
Max Your Studio and cover ALL your music production needs
94 products, 16,800 sounds, 39 high-end mixing/mastering processors and over 350 gear models for guitar and bass so you can meet the demands of today's most challenging music productions.
Read more at www.ikmultimedia.comhenry olonga wrote:Nebula - dirt cheap - CPU hungry - space hungry - highly accurate.
Acesys wrote:Hi kvaca,
I've spent some time with Nebula and have a few solutions to your reservations.
1. Nebula Reverbs are what take up hard drive space and high CPU. I recommend ditch those altogether.
2. Libraries: AlexB arguably has the best electronic finesse on the analog side, and the results are of course stunning. At his website I've downloaded 86 demo presets that are every bit as good as the paid stuff.
One night recently I checked the 3rd-party sites for free/demo Nebula presets, and this is what I was able to download:
AnalogInTheBox = at least 4 demos
Signal To Noise = at least 7 demos
Tim Petherick = at least 6 demos
Trancending Music = 1 free psychoacoustic panner
VNXT = 2 demos
- "Don't cost nothin'" - Bluto, Animal House
Henry Olonga did some rare microphones that AlexB didn't do, and while I can't think of free stuff Henry offers beyond static impulses, his prices are very low/reasonable and for instance a beautiful woofy U-67 (with that refined top end) at £1.50 is one of many breathtaking deals he offers.
Acesys wrote:Too often I hear audio recorded with horrible room artifacts: un-treated reverb, bad mic placement, bad mics and preamps for that matter. Like YouTube speeches from their phone cam or whatever. Nebula won't be much help after the fact.
Acesys wrote:If you want a real neat test for Nebula, try some old Robert Johnson recordings. Regular digital EQs show their wimpiness like no other test. Then try Nebula. Really, most any preset will fatten it up, by way of comparison, satisfactorily.
Acesys wrote:Why don't you f**k off and rain on someone else's parade?
I mean, you're whining that Nebula doesn't nail a pro-sumer unit when even the UAD forums are full of people who can't make up their minds which emulation of serious consoles (etc) they like better, UAD or Nebula.
kvaca wrote:Acesys wrote:Why don't you f**k off and rain on someone else's parade?
I mean, you're whining that Nebula doesn't nail a pro-sumer unit when even the UAD forums are full of people who can't make up their minds which emulation of serious consoles (etc) they like better, UAD or Nebula.
calm down, Im not whining just surprised how it come that imperfection is still called "high accuracy" in all threads about Nebula from the very start...
I can accept that people like UAD or Nebula or any other console emus, its normal, but has nothing to do with my basic question: if Nebula cannot nail cheap consumer unit /which I can prove if needed/, how it can nail pro consoles better??... but please dont answer again, this question is not directed to users or fanatic lovers but to Nebula library devs...which Im afraid you arent
Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:Nebula can NOT replicate all possible units.
Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:-high-end gear is EASIER to reproduce than CHEAP gear.
Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:- many nebula libraries are incredibly good.
Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:Many libraries are pretty accurate, but it isn't so important...
Our method is sometimes more accurate because there is an huge community reporting bugs and inaccurate results..
Zaphod (giancarlo) wrote:Hope it helps, now relax a bit
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2018
Submit: News, Plug-ins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement