Having just demo'd them both (as well as Molekular) I'd say MUX -- though purely from an FX perspective.Numanoid wrote:What do you guys prefer if you had to choose between MUX or KarmaFX?
http://www.kvraudio.com/product/karmafx ... fx/details
MUX in review
-
- KVRAF
- 7356 posts since 9 Jan, 2003 from Saint Louis MO
-
- KVRAF
- 1671 posts since 11 Nov, 2009 from Northern CA
Mux looks intriguing. It's never come across my radar before seeing this thread. Does anyone know how it compares to AAS's Tassman? There's not a lot of detail on the Mux page at MuTools.com, but they look to be somewhat similar in what one can accomplish with them.
-
- KVRian
- 1339 posts since 25 Sep, 2011 from New York
Today is the first time i heard of MuLab and Mux all together. I see MUX is a Modular Synth but i am wondering if it can Load inside it regular VSTs as Modules, for chaining, routings e tc...it looks good.
Reality is a Condition due to Lack of Weed!
-
- Banned
- 10196 posts since 12 Mar, 2012 from the Bavarian Alps to my feet and the globe around my head
MUX can load VSTi AND VST inside, so you can chain everything what you like to chain (except women)...BasariStudios wrote:Today is the first time i heard of MuLab and Mux all together. I see MUX is a Modular Synth but i am wondering if it can Load inside it regular VSTs as Modules, for chaining, routings e tc...it looks good.
-
- KVRian
- 1339 posts since 25 Sep, 2011 from New York
That's the next request.
Reality is a Condition due to Lack of Weed!
