What is KVR Audio? | Submit News | Advertise | Developer Account

Options (Affects News & Product results only):

OS:
Format:
Include:
Quick Search KVR

"Quick Search" KVR Audio's Product Database, News Items, Developer Listings, Forum Topics and videos here. For advanced Product Database searching please use the full product search. For the forum you can use the phpBB forum search.

To utilize the power of Google you can use the integrated Google Site Search.

Products 0

Developers 0

News 0

Forum 0

Videos 0

Search  

Predator vs Massive?

VST, AU, etc. plug-in Virtual Instruments discussion

Moderator: Moderators (Main)

Predator or Massive

Rob Papen Predator
22
37%
Native Instruments Massive
38
63%
 
Total votes : 60
KVRAF
 
8602 posts since 2 Feb, 2005, from in the wilds
 

Postby pdxindy; Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:16 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

Lotuzia wrote:Btw imo a synth *doesnt go in a direction*, or *lends itself etc etc*. Its a machine, an instrument, it just does what humans want, not the opposite.


That is nonsense... Different synths have different sonic characteristics... Or what, you now claim that all filters sound the same?
KVRAF
 
8602 posts since 2 Feb, 2005, from in the wilds
 

Postby pdxindy; Fri Jun 27, 2014 4:36 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

Lotuzia wrote:Well what you said first was : " As I said, you cannot directly modulate a parameter via Modwheel, Pitch wheel, Breath or Expression in Massive. .....If you like to play in realtime with a keyboard, then it is a big hassle. .......I mention it when Massive comes up because it never occurred to me that you could not directly assign Modwheel to cutoff "

So provided you used the trick I mentioned you can assign mod wheel to cut off in a flash, especially when you design your own presets from scratch.


I said you cannot directly modulate a parameter via Modwheel. This is a fact.

And I also mention the 'trick' which is obvious and I have known of for years. And I explained why it is problematic. Lots of people do not design all their own presets from scratch. Lots of people use presets and/or modify existing ones. Existing presets already have various parameters assigned to the macros, so there is not an empty macro that one can just use 'in a flash'. I also explained a number of specific situations where it is problematic and causes unnecessary work simply because NI couldn't be bothered to put in the basic modulation sources that most synths have.

If you are happy using it, fine. Lots of people are.
KVRAF
 
7850 posts since 16 Apr, 2003, from -on the outside looking in
 

Postby ouroboros; Fri Jun 27, 2014 8:24 pm Re: Predator vs Massive?

Curious re: envelope opinions.
I do feel more control with Massive; can get snappier.
Is this just visual placebo?
Filter isn't as nice though
KVRer
 
7 posts since 23 Jun, 2014, from USA
 

Postby drumbeat; Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:07 pm Re: Predator vs Massive?

I voted for Native Instruments Massive
Image
KVRer
 
1 post since 22 Feb, 2014

Postby JackJ; Sat Jun 28, 2014 12:44 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

Both are great - I have Predator as a Reason rack extension that opens up a wealth of control and tweaking possibilities for many parameters by using Reason's rich automation capabilities that are "hardwired" into the Predator rack extension itself (e.g., by right-clicking on a particular knob). And that's in addition to what you can do when you flip Predator over in the rack to reveal its cabling and input/output options!

So to the extent that some commenters feel that Predator's control/automation possibilities are limited either standalone or as a VSTi plugin, they may want to consider using Predator in Reason as a rack extension.
KVRAF
 
7268 posts since 19 Feb, 2004, from Paris
 

Postby Lotuzia; Sat Jun 28, 2014 1:35 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

pdxindy wrote:
Lotuzia wrote:Btw imo a synth *doesnt go in a direction*, or *lends itself etc etc*. Its a machine, an instrument, it just does what humans want, not the opposite.


That is nonsense... Different synths have different sonic characteristics... Or what, you now claim that all filters sound the same?

Hmmm I think I lost you ( or maybe you lost me ... dunno )

All I said is that you can make Massive sound smooth, lush, soft and expressive and I provided around 10 mn of audio demos of presets in isolation to try to underline this etc etc

Never did I say that all filters sound the same. I think the confusion is between the character of a preset, and the unique character of a synthesizer. These are quite different things, even if they are in some way related. :shrug:
http://www.lelotusbleu.fr Soundbanks for Vsti

77 Exclusive Soundbanks for 23 synths, 8 Sound Designers, Hours of audio Demos. The Sound you miss might be there [Xils-Lab Team]
User avatar
KVRAF
 
3644 posts since 26 Apr, 2007, from Noosphere

Postby Igro; Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:06 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

Lotuzia wrote:I think the confusion is between the character of a preset, and the unique character of a synthesizer. These are quite different things, even if they are in some way related. :shrug:


Exactly my thoughts too. Presets in Massive are harsh, but they are made this way. This is how the opinion about the synth character went into the masses.
User avatar
KVRAF
 
7430 posts since 20 Nov, 2003, from Lost and Spaced
  

Postby osiris; Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:00 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

Massive doesn't have a built in vocoder -1
JPQ
KVRian
 
974 posts since 7 Jan, 2008, from Finland

Postby JPQ; Sat Jun 28, 2014 7:57 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

I own licence for Massive and only tested Predator. i Prefer predator i newer get Warm Massive sound. why i own Massive? becouse comes with Komplete...
User avatar
KVRAF
 
3644 posts since 26 Apr, 2007, from Noosphere

Postby Igro; Sat Jun 28, 2014 8:20 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

btw, those interested in Predator, Blue 2 has the same audio engine. And they cost the same price.
JPQ
KVRian
 
974 posts since 7 Jan, 2008, from Finland

Postby JPQ; Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:28 pm Re: Predator vs Massive?

I think Predator has different filters at least bur i check. and i have own licence for Blur 2.
User avatar
KVRAF
 
3644 posts since 26 Apr, 2007, from Noosphere

Postby Igro; Sat Jun 28, 2014 4:01 pm Re: Predator vs Massive?

JPQ wrote:I think Predator has different filters at least bur i check. and i have own licence for Blur 2.

Don't know about the filters. I have Blue 2 and really like it. But there are still some work toward the quality would be appreciated. One of them is making more accurate audio precision up to one sample. it's not important for pad sounds, but it would be useful for basses and leads. Not sure if they consider these thoughts though, as they concern about the subsequent increase in CPU load.
KVRian
 
1027 posts since 6 May, 2005, from Michigan, USA
 

Postby Vectorman; Sat Jun 28, 2014 4:28 pm Re: Predator vs Massive?

Some of the perception of Massive as harsh/metallic sounding may come from the fact that it's a wavetable scanning synth and many of the wavetables are rather edgy-sounding. It can get pretty nasty fast if you let it. You do have to take care which wavetables you combine, what indexes/position modulation you specify, and how you use the filters to tame excessive overtones. The same can be said of the PPG Wave, Waldorf Microwaves/Blofeld, etc. I noticed the Virus TI seemed more forgiving, but its wavetables seemed to be a tad less on the aggressive side mostly and it has a somewhat more subdued-sounding top end in general (granted, I'm going from memory - it was five or six years ago when I had a TI).

I played around a bit with some resynthesized Massive wavetables in Zebra at some point. The results with Zebra's very different-sounding filters (well, different-sounding engine period) were rather nice. Same thing with the PPG waveforms - patches came out sounding somewhat PPG-like, but Zebra's engine put a new spin on it.
User avatar
KVRAF
 
3644 posts since 26 Apr, 2007, from Noosphere

Postby Igro; Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:38 am Re: Predator vs Massive?

Vectorman wrote:Some of the perception of Massive as harsh/metallic sounding may come from the fact that it's a wavetable scanning synth and many of the wavetables are rather edgy-sounding. It can get pretty nasty fast if you let it. You do have to take care which wavetables you combine, what indexes/position modulation you specify, and how you use the filters to tame excessive overtones. The same can be said of the PPG Wave, Waldorf Microwaves/Blofeld, etc. I noticed the Virus TI seemed more forgiving, but its wavetables seemed to be a tad less on the aggressive side mostly and it has a somewhat more subdued-sounding top end in general (granted, I'm going from memory - it was five or six years ago when I had a TI).

I played around a bit with some resynthesized Massive wavetables in Zebra at some point. The results with Zebra's very different-sounding filters (well, different-sounding engine period) were rather nice. Same thing with the PPG waveforms - patches came out sounding somewhat PPG-like, but Zebra's engine put a new spin on it.


Ho Vectorman! Nice post. How did you resynthesized Massive wavetables in Zebra?
Previous

Moderator: Moderators (Main)

Return to Instruments