Acon Digital Multiply support topic
- KVRAF
- 3303 posts since 6 Jul, 2012 from Sick-cily
mmmmmmm, understand, thanks to enlight Me!
- KVRAF
- 4756 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
This is an innovative plugin, with great sound! EQs, reverbs, delays, filters, etc give you many detailed controls, but most chorus effects are the same: delay, depth, rate and spread, and can sound muddy when pushed. Congrats to Acon for rethinking the chorus, with rate and depth for AM and FM, voices, an eq with a very clever way to shape curves, and great sounding presets! For Thinking Outside the Box, and clean sound, this is my pick for best KVR-DC plugin.
d o n 't
w a n t
m o r e
w a n t
m o r e
- KVRian
- 1466 posts since 1 Jan, 2005 from Norway
Thank you very much for your nice comments and your vote, Michael! Much appreciated.Michael L wrote:This is an innovative plugin, with great sound! EQs, reverbs, delays, filters, etc give you many detailed controls, but most chorus effects are the same: delay, depth, rate and spread, and can sound muddy when pushed. Congrats to Acon for rethinking the chorus, with rate and depth for AM and FM, voices, an eq with a very clever way to shape curves, and great sounding presets! For Thinking Outside the Box, and clean sound, this is my pick for best KVR-DC plugin.
Best,
Stian
-
- KVRer
- 7 posts since 30 May, 2010
This is my favorite fx in this challenge !
Good job !!!
NB: Another great idea would be to update your VST effect chainer (with vst3 support and L/R insert vstfx capability ). Perhaps soon ?
Toph.
Good job !!!
NB: Another great idea would be to update your VST effect chainer (with vst3 support and L/R insert vstfx capability ). Perhaps soon ?
Toph.
- KVRian
- 1466 posts since 1 Jan, 2005 from Norway
I'm very glad to hear that, thanks for your vote! It is very probable that we will release another chainer. Probably a free one as well as a commercial version with additional features.subderground wrote:This is my favorite fx in this challenge !
Good job !!!
NB: Another great idea would be to update your VST effect chainer (with vst3 support and L/R insert vstfx capability ). Perhaps soon ?
Toph.
Best,
Stian
-
Guest231427 Guest231427 https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
I really like this chorus effect, it is very innovative and very usable. I love the flexibility of it.
The CPU overhead is between 10% - 20% (ish), depending on settings on my Studio One x64 setup, so it is not by any means prohibitive.
Thank you Acon Digital for this amazing free VST effect.
It has my vote as the top entry
The CPU overhead is between 10% - 20% (ish), depending on settings on my Studio One x64 setup, so it is not by any means prohibitive.
Thank you Acon Digital for this amazing free VST effect.
It has my vote as the top entry
- KVRian
- 1466 posts since 1 Jan, 2005 from Norway
Thank you very much for your vote! The CPU overhead sounds high, though. Even with all 6 voices enabled and a buffer size of 256 samples, the CPU meter stays between 3 and 4% here on a modest computer with an i5...RockinLily wrote:I really like this chorus effect, it is very innovative and very usable. I love the flexibility of it.
The CPU overhead is between 10% - 20% (ish), depending on settings on my Studio One x64 setup, so it is not by any means prohibitive.
Thank you Acon Digital for this amazing free VST effect.
It has my vote as the top entry
Best,
Stian
-
Guest231427 Guest231427 https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1
Sorry, it was a bit of an over simplification when I said 10-20% ish.stian wrote:[
The CPU overhead sounds high, though. Even with all 6 voices enabled and a buffer size of 256 samples, the CPU meter stays between 3 and 4% here on a modest computer with an i5...
I found that using multiply as an insert on a simple guitar audio track the CPU (as measured by the Studio One performance tool) was between 5% - 12% (12% being with 6 voices dialed in).
However, when used as an insert on a midi loop played through 4Front Rhode VST, the CPU overhead increased to 8% - 17% (highest figure with 6 voices), again measured the same way.
My computer is a more modest spec than the one that you mention; being dual core AMD Athlon but 64 bit.
Either way, there are no problems at all with Multiply and it is very usable with good quality sound
The CPU overhead is a lot lower than Digital Verberate CM, which has a CPU overhead of 20% +
(again an oversimplification), but again is still very usable as well.
- KVRian
- 1466 posts since 1 Jan, 2005 from Norway
Thanks!!Stopani wrote:Multiply is excellent. Great Job!
- KVRian
- 1466 posts since 1 Jan, 2005 from Norway
Thanks for clarifying that!RockinLily wrote:stian wrote:Sorry, it was a bit of an over simplification when I said 10-20% ish.
I found that using multiply as an insert on a simple guitar audio track the CPU (as measured by the Studio One performance tool) was between 5% - 12% (12% being with 6 voices dialed in).
However, when used as an insert on a midi loop played through 4Front Rhode VST, the CPU overhead increased to 8% - 17% (highest figure with 6 voices), again measured the same way.
My computer is a more modest spec than the one that you mention; being dual core AMD Athlon but 64 bit.
Either way, there are no problems at all with Multiply and it is very usable with good quality sound
The CPU overhead is a lot lower than Digital Verberate CM, which has a CPU overhead of 20% +
(again an oversimplification), but again is still very usable as well.
Best,
Stian
-
- KVRian
- 1034 posts since 4 Jan, 2005 from Traun Austria
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1153 posts since 11 Aug, 2004 from Breuillet, France
-
- KVRAF
- 6821 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france