Latest News: Bitwig updates Bitwig Studio to v5.1
Is the Audio Engine in Bitwig up to snuff?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 112 posts since 29 Aug, 2010
I'm setting up comparable projects in both DAWs I own: Bitwig and FL Studio. Right now I feel I am getting more satisfying results in FL Studio. I'm no audio engineer. I'm not an expert on pan laws. It just seems with a little EQ etc I'm getting more the results I want right now with the latest FL 12...
Well, I'm hoping 1.2 might win me back... I'll use Bitwig for audio manipulation and it's fancy in house features - but right now, honestly, until I see what 1.2 might deliver, I would not do a final mix in Bitwig... not when better options seem to be out there.
Am I being unfair? Maybe just my imagination? I want the products I've invested in to naturally be the best they can be - including Bitwig.
Well, I'm hoping 1.2 might win me back... I'll use Bitwig for audio manipulation and it's fancy in house features - but right now, honestly, until I see what 1.2 might deliver, I would not do a final mix in Bitwig... not when better options seem to be out there.
Am I being unfair? Maybe just my imagination? I want the products I've invested in to naturally be the best they can be - including Bitwig.
- KVRAF
- 2562 posts since 1 Oct, 2013
You know, the plugs are different in each daw so if you're doing processing with these of course it's going to sound different. Then there's the effect the interface has on you, the look of it and the difference in the decisions you make due to workflow and stuff. This is such an old issue anyway. It's very easy for people to trick themselves into thinking they hear a difference when there isn't one. So yeah, it's most likely your imagination. If it "feels" different or "you just seem to get better results" or whatever that means nothing. Null tests are the proof.
-
- KVRAF
- 2194 posts since 18 Mar, 2006 from Plymouth, UK
Then use FL12. Bitwig (like any other DAW) is just as capable audio-wise, but if something is working for you, why change ?marztecheque wrote:It just seems with a little EQ etc I'm getting more the results I want right now with the latest FL 12...
There's no shame in using multiple DAWs. Just accept that any core sound 'differences' are either a difference in plugins, settings, or your own perception.
-
- KVRian
- 841 posts since 6 Nov, 2004 from UK
As a mixing & mastering engineer, who has worked in many daws, I can honestly say that bitwig audio engine is fantastic & I prefer mixing with it than anything else.
I'm not saying all the plugins or effect are better than other 3rd party ones though. It depends on how you define the "engine". In terms of pure clean summing, it's perfect.
Bitwig is super clean and it was a good move by the devs to start each track at - 10db which makes it harder for new users to overload the master easily... Something which was very easy to do in FL, Infact I think it defaults to having a limiter plugin on the master. Stuff like that may give FL it's "sound" but imho bitwig is superior as a mixing tool.
I'm not saying all the plugins or effect are better than other 3rd party ones though. It depends on how you define the "engine". In terms of pure clean summing, it's perfect.
Bitwig is super clean and it was a good move by the devs to start each track at - 10db which makes it harder for new users to overload the master easily... Something which was very easy to do in FL, Infact I think it defaults to having a limiter plugin on the master. Stuff like that may give FL it's "sound" but imho bitwig is superior as a mixing tool.
- KVRian
- 763 posts since 11 Aug, 2014 from a hillside
I jumped through the roof the first time I played the new track in FLS 12 and may have woke up half of the neighbours it was so loud. Its not just the mixers set high, many of the newer instruments like harmor have a very loud default sound too. I think they have had a lot of complaints about audio quality over the years, so have started to take an aggressively loud approach.askewd wrote:Bitwig is super clean and it was a good move by the devs to start each track at - 10db which makes it harder for new users to overload the master easily... Something which was very easy to do in FL, Infact I think it defaults to having a limiter plugin on the master. Stuff like that may give FL it's "sound" but imho bitwig is superior as a mixing tool.
As far as audio engine being up to the job, this is asked of nearly every DAW on the market. Mostly this comes down to loudness, as even a fraction of a dB difference can have a tremendous effect on how we perceive a sound. There is a good thread on the FL forum that discusses the audio engine wars, which is worth checking out.
http://forum.image-line.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=45272
-
- KVRist
- 127 posts since 19 May, 2014
This.askewd wrote:As a mixing & mastering engineer, who has worked in many daws, I can honestly say that bitwig audio engine is fantastic & I prefer mixing with it than anything else.
I'm not saying all the plugins or effect are better than other 3rd party ones though. It depends on how you define the "engine". In terms of pure clean summing, it's perfect.
Bitwig is super clean and it was a good move by the devs to start each track at - 10db which makes it harder for new users to overload the master easily... Something which was very easy to do in FL, Infact I think it defaults to having a limiter plugin on the master. Stuff like that may give FL it's "sound" but imho bitwig is superior as a mixing tool.
Coming from Live, the Bitwig audio engine sounds much more "full" somehow... it almost has an analog quality to it but that is probably just the design of the default effects that are bundled - for example the delay-2 feels more like a tape delay rather than a digital one. (set an LFO running on the delay time to see what I mean)
-
- KVRAF
- 4501 posts since 3 Oct, 2013 from Budapest
"Coming from Live, the Bitwig audio engine sounds much more "full" somehow"...
+1, for me fx units of BWS sounds much more organic/less sterile than their counterparts in AL
+1, for me fx units of BWS sounds much more organic/less sterile than their counterparts in AL
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
-
- Banned
- 1601 posts since 29 Sep, 2014 from Halmstad, Sweden
You know that loudness can be achived in any daw.. That project is made by someone with skills. Dont trick yourself into believing that song is because fl studio. Buy because of the engineer that made that song! But something i think fl plugins make a very dry in your face sound very easy. because of limiter on master and plugins like maximus and harmor etc. But dont forget... These can be used as thirdparty plugins inside bitwig except the limiter. Soo its not a matter of which plugins fl studio offers. But the workflow of the daws. By default bitwig with -10 sounds quited and another reason i think bitwig sounds quited is because i found it sound like more dynamic and cool sensation of depth to it in stereo also that i really never felt in fl studio. Like organic somehow. Its can be me tricking myself. Remember every defualt vst is diffrent somehow and even if you make same settings i might sound diffrent. To come up with same sound you probably have to mix diffrent with diffrent settingsgoatgirl wrote:I jumped through the roof the first time I played the new track in FLS 12 and may have woke up half of the neighbours it was so loud. Its not just the mixers set high, many of the newer instruments like harmor have a very loud default sound too. I think they have had a lot of complaints about audio quality over the years, so have started to take an aggressively loud approach.askewd wrote:Bitwig is super clean and it was a good move by the devs to start each track at - 10db which makes it harder for new users to overload the master easily... Something which was very easy to do in FL, Infact I think it defaults to having a limiter plugin on the master. Stuff like that may give FL it's "sound" but imho bitwig is superior as a mixing tool.
As far as audio engine being up to the job, this is asked of nearly every DAW on the market. Mostly this comes down to loudness, as even a fraction of a dB difference can have a tremendous effect on how we perceive a sound. There is a good thread on the FL forum that discusses the audio engine wars, which is worth checking out.
http://forum.image-line.com/viewtopic.php?f=100&t=45272
desktop: windows 10 x64, i5 4690k, 32gb ram 1600mhz, 2x ssd 128 gb +2x3 tb, asus gtx 970, asus proz gamer motherboard, no external audiocard
laptop: windows 10 x64, i7 mq4700, 12gb ram 1600mhz, 1 tb, asus gt 750
laptop: windows 10 x64, i7 mq4700, 12gb ram 1600mhz, 1 tb, asus gt 750
-
- Banned
- 576 posts since 3 Jul, 2010
i always thinked each daw sound transparent & dont make sound qualitty, as it depends the soundcard.
but i also like cub & S1 quality... (64 BIT floating... some say its useless thoo.)
but i also like cub & S1 quality... (64 BIT floating... some say its useless thoo.)
night life...
sry but i can't talk alone.
sry but i can't talk alone.
- KVRian
- 763 posts since 11 Aug, 2014 from a hillside
I agree. I was just giving an example of the difference between a fresh installation. I am so used to the Bitwig levels and also my own setup in FL11, where I have everything turned down in the mixer, that I forgot that a fresh install of FL has most things turned up to 0dB.ronnyrydgren wrote: You know that loudness can be achived in any daw.. That project is made by someone with skills. Dont trick yourself into believing that song is because fl studio. Buy because of the engineer that made that song!
The workflow was the primary reason why I changed DAW's. I much prefer the linearity and immediacy of getting to parameters within Bitwig. Though this is purely a personal preference. The modularity is really the icing on the cake, which I only began to appreciate once I started to use it.Soo its not a matter of which plugins fl studio offers. But the workflow of the daws.
It all starts to become subjectve really when talking about how something sounds. One audio engine is very much like another, though there are differences with the included devices. There are so many factors that affect how we percieve a sound, such that eveyones experience of it will be unique. This can make a difference in our musical endeavours and our choice of tools. Personally , I like the orange colours that Bitwig uses, to me it produces much warmer tones to my musicLike organic somehow. Its can be me tricking myself. Remember every defualt vst is diffrent somehow and even if you make same settings i might sound diffrent. To come up with same sound you probably have to mix diffrent with diffrent settings
- KVRian
- 1372 posts since 28 Dec, 2012 from Meredith NH
This is why I have a Les Paul and a Stratocaster.goatgirl wrote:I agree. I was just giving an example of the difference between a fresh installation. I am so used to the Bitwig levels and also my own setup in FL11, where I have everything turned down in the mixer, that I forgot that a fresh install of FL has most things turned up to 0dB.ronnyrydgren wrote: You know that loudness can be achived in any daw.. That project is made by someone with skills. Dont trick yourself into believing that song is because fl studio. Buy because of the engineer that made that song!
The workflow was the primary reason why I changed DAW's. I much prefer the linearity and immediacy of getting to parameters within Bitwig. Though this is purely a personal preference. The modularity is really the icing on the cake, which I only began to appreciate once I started to use it.Soo its not a matter of which plugins fl studio offers. But the workflow of the daws.
It all starts to become subjectve really when talking about how something sounds. One audio engine is very much like another, though there are differences with the included devices. There are so many factors that affect how we percieve a sound, such that eveyones experience of it will be unique. This can make a difference in our musical endeavours and our choice of tools. Personally , I like the orange colours that Bitwig uses, to me it produces much warmer tones to my musicLike organic somehow. Its can be me tricking myself. Remember every defualt vst is diffrent somehow and even if you make same settings i might sound diffrent. To come up with same sound you probably have to mix diffrent with diffrent settings
Michael Schmalle
http://www.teotigraphix.com
Surfing on sine waves
Maschine4Bitwig - Studio, MK2, MikroMK2, MK1
http://www.teotigraphix.com/bitwig/maschine
http://www.teotigraphix.com
Surfing on sine waves
Maschine4Bitwig - Studio, MK2, MikroMK2, MK1
http://www.teotigraphix.com/bitwig/maschine
- KVRian
- 1372 posts since 28 Dec, 2012 from Meredith NH
Well the strat is black but the Les Paul is a sunburst orange, like Slash's guitar except a little deeper orange and burnt orange around the trim. (no kidding)goatgirl wrote:Cool... are they orange too ?TeotiGraphix wrote: This is why I have a Les Paul and a Stratocaster.
Michael Schmalle
http://www.teotigraphix.com
Surfing on sine waves
Maschine4Bitwig - Studio, MK2, MikroMK2, MK1
http://www.teotigraphix.com/bitwig/maschine
http://www.teotigraphix.com
Surfing on sine waves
Maschine4Bitwig - Studio, MK2, MikroMK2, MK1
http://www.teotigraphix.com/bitwig/maschine
-
- KVRian
- 777 posts since 13 Dec, 2011
Having a limiter plug-in at the end of the device chain on the master output by default is not a bad idea at all (but Bitwig will not even let me do that...). In the very first demo song provided by Bitwig that I downloaded and played (the "ModeAudio" Bitwig Studio Demo Song, someone has allowed the master output to clip by a few dB's.askewd wrote:Bitwig is super clean and it was a good move by the devs to start each track at - 10db which makes it harder for new users to overload the master easily... Something which was very easy to do in FL, Infact I think it defaults to having a limiter plugin on the master. Stuff like that may give FL it's "sound" but imho bitwig is superior as a mixing tool.
-
- Banned
- 1601 posts since 29 Sep, 2014 from Halmstad, Sweden
Why wont bitwig let u put a limiter last in chain? You mean as a template?Ch00rD wrote:Having a limiter plug-in at the end of the device chain on the master output by default is not a bad idea at all (but Bitwig will not even let me do that...). In the very first demo song provided by Bitwig that I downloaded and played (the "ModeAudio" Bitwig Studio Demo Song, someone has allowed the master output to clip by a few dB's.askewd wrote:Bitwig is super clean and it was a good move by the devs to start each track at - 10db which makes it harder for new users to overload the master easily... Something which was very easy to do in FL, Infact I think it defaults to having a limiter plugin on the master. Stuff like that may give FL it's "sound" but imho bitwig is superior as a mixing tool.
haha yes that song i rember that, after i saw it clip i closed the demosong xD
desktop: windows 10 x64, i5 4690k, 32gb ram 1600mhz, 2x ssd 128 gb +2x3 tb, asus gtx 970, asus proz gamer motherboard, no external audiocard
laptop: windows 10 x64, i7 mq4700, 12gb ram 1600mhz, 1 tb, asus gt 750
laptop: windows 10 x64, i7 mq4700, 12gb ram 1600mhz, 1 tb, asus gt 750