Did you take a look at DC8C?kelvyn wrote:I have almost all the FabFilter plugins with the exception of Saturn, MB and the gater... Am I the only person who thinks that €52 for the upgrade is a bit steep?
I know it's not fair to compare but I just purchased MJUC for €24.
Just saying!
Fabfilter ProC 2
- KVRAF
- 1603 posts since 18 Feb, 2005 from Serbia
It's easy if you know how
-
- KVRian
- 1400 posts since 9 Feb, 2012
MJUC is so last month...
WEASEL: World Electro-Acoustic Sound Excitation Laboratories
-
- KVRian
- 671 posts since 11 May, 2014
This shit is hilarious. People were saying MJUC was the greatest compressor ever and now we got people saying it sucks compared to Pro-C2. Lolololantithesist wrote:MJUC is so last month...
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 9684 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
it is kvr.. a large chunk of us are hobbyist consumers; this is entertainment not strictly art or a job/work.ckam03 wrote:This shit is hilarious. People were saying MJUC was the greatest compressor ever and now we got people saying it sucks compared to Pro-C2. Lolololantithesist wrote:MJUC is so last month...
So people collect and horde plugins like their pokemon... going from one to another after a period of becoming bored with one.
- KVRAF
- 5483 posts since 15 Dec, 2011 from Bucharest, Romania
MJUC it's a great product. But unusable for me CPU wise: MJUC 12%, Pro-C2 2-3% (even lower usage than Pro-C1).ckam03 wrote:People were saying MJUC was the greatest compressor ever and now we got people saying it sucks compared to Pro-C2.
-
- KVRAF
- 4349 posts since 30 Aug, 2012 from Sweden
I was thinking sell, or trade C1 for Saturn, here in kvr soon. What a misstake that would have been.
-
- KVRAF
- 4349 posts since 30 Aug, 2012 from Sweden
I was thinking sell, or trade C1 for Saturn, here in kvr soon. What a misstake that would have been.
- KVRAF
- 7337 posts since 9 Jan, 2003 from Saint Louis MO
Black magic.Sparky77 wrote:How is that?foosnark wrote:$36.76 for the upgrade... and done. What, there's a demo or a video or something? Pshaw.
Mine is double and I own most of FabFilters stuff.
Seriously though, I dunno. I had One, a Timeless2/Twin2/Volcano2 bundle, and a Pro-L/Pro-C bundle. I might have had a survey credit too, but I don't think I had referral credits.
-
comfortablynick comfortablynick https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=358558
- KVRist
- 234 posts since 15 May, 2015
MJUC is definitely heavier on the CPU than most comps, but I get nowhere near those numbers in Reaper on my 4-year old i7 machine (with HQ, density and drive ON):e@rs wrote:MJUC it's a great product. But unusable for me CPU wise: MJUC 12%, Pro-C2 2-3% (even lower usage than Pro-C1).ckam03 wrote:People were saying MJUC was the greatest compressor ever and now we got people saying it sucks compared to Pro-C2.
- Mk 1: 1.6%
- Mk 2: 1.2%
- Mk 3: 1.3%
As far as Pro-C 2 goes, yes it is very CPU efficient. Once again on my i7 machine:
- Non-Oversampling: 0.2%
- 2x Oversampling: 0.6%
- 4x Oversampling: 1.0%
Nick
-
- KVRist
- 201 posts since 14 May, 2008
Hey folks,
I've been running some tests on the demo using a tone generator and a frequency analyzer and I'm afraid I am detecting some truly nasty digital artifacts here.
The only mode that seams to be clean is the Master mode. Classic mode is a mess.
I'm getting way cleaner results from Studio One's native compressor.
Is anyone willing to run some tests to see if we get similar results?
Cheers,
R.
I've been running some tests on the demo using a tone generator and a frequency analyzer and I'm afraid I am detecting some truly nasty digital artifacts here.
The only mode that seams to be clean is the Master mode. Classic mode is a mess.
I'm getting way cleaner results from Studio One's native compressor.
Is anyone willing to run some tests to see if we get similar results?
Cheers,
R.
Last edited by RafaelMorgan on Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 5943 posts since 8 Jul, 2009
We would need the details of your test methodology in order to be able to compare results. if you can explain your process in detail that would help.RafaelMorgan wrote:Hey folks,
I've been running some tests on the demo using a tone generator and a frequency analyzer and I'm afraid I am detecting some nasty digital artifacts here.
I'm getting way cleaner results from Studio One's native compressor.
Is anyone willing to run some tests to see if we get similar results?
Cheers,
R.
#NONFR Check out my music at Bandcamp Free Streaming!
Free music with your support on Patreon | Youtube: Music of Plexus Videos (music videos) | Youtube: Plexus Productions (audio related) Stop whining. Make music.
Free music with your support on Patreon | Youtube: Music of Plexus Videos (music videos) | Youtube: Plexus Productions (audio related) Stop whining. Make music.
-
- KVRist
- 201 posts since 14 May, 2008
Besides my own ears, I'm just sandwiching Pro C 2 between Studio One's native tone generator and spectrum analyzer (using the highest possible FFT resolution), experimenting with different tone frequencies, compressor ratios, attack/release times, etc...plexuss wrote: We would need the details of your test methodology in order to be able to compare results. if you can explain your process in detail that would help.
I'm also comparing it to Studio One's native compressor, TDR Feeback Compressor II and ReaComp on similar settings, with much cleaner results from them. Will compare to other compressors later when I have the time. So far, TDR Feedback Compressor is the winner here, as the cleanest compressor I've ever tested.
My results may be wrong though. I'm not an expert in this kind of thing. It would be cool if someone else could run similar tests.
- KVRAF
- 5943 posts since 8 Jul, 2009
What kinds of signals are you running through C2? or do you just want me to try various types and see if I get artifacts? remember not all artifacts are "bad" - many plugins attempt to re-create artifacts that "sound good". i know that Q1 sounds more "transparent" than Q2 and FF agree (see their forum). it could be the artifacts are there to emulate pleasing hardware artifacts.RafaelMorgan wrote:Besides my own ears, I'm just sandwiching Pro C 2 between Studio One's native tone generator and spectrum analyzer (using the highest possible FFT resolution), experimenting with different tone frequencies, compressor ratios, attack/release times, etc...plexuss wrote: We would need the details of your test methodology in order to be able to compare results. if you can explain your process in detail that would help.
I'm also comparing it to Studio One's native compressor, TDR Feeback Compressor II and ReaComp on similar settings, with much cleaner results from them. Will compare to other compressors later when I have the time. So far, TDR Feedback Compressor is the winner here, as the cleanest compressor I've ever tested.
My results may be wrong though. I'm not an expert in this kind of thing. It would be cool if someone else could run similar tests.
I am just finishing up a track where I am using C2 a lot. once its done I will try some testing and see what I come up with.
#NONFR Check out my music at Bandcamp Free Streaming!
Free music with your support on Patreon | Youtube: Music of Plexus Videos (music videos) | Youtube: Plexus Productions (audio related) Stop whining. Make music.
Free music with your support on Patreon | Youtube: Music of Plexus Videos (music videos) | Youtube: Plexus Productions (audio related) Stop whining. Make music.
- KVRAF
- 5483 posts since 15 Dec, 2011 from Bucharest, Romania
I also got 6 products (the most expensive ones) and I have to pay EUR 52...foosnark wrote:Black magic.Sparky77 wrote:How is that?foosnark wrote:$36.76 for the upgrade... and done. What, there's a demo or a video or something? Pshaw.
Mine is double and I own most of FabFilters stuff.
Seriously though, I dunno. I had One, a Timeless2/Twin2/Volcano2 bundle, and a Pro-L/Pro-C bundle. I might have had a survey credit too, but I don't think I had referral credits.