How many of you run your music via some kind of mastering plugin?
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1378 posts since 8 Feb, 2006
I think I will only keep a limiter now on and treat everything invidually.
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Eq and compressor here on master bus for mixing sake, also limiter for loudness on bypass (doesn't get rendered with final mix), that's all.
What falls into mastering plugins, things like Ozone?
What falls into mastering plugins, things like Ozone?
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? ShawnG
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1378 posts since 8 Feb, 2006
Ozone, Waves etc. I'm a Reason user so I can only use the stocks or Rack Extension ones. But yeah, I trust "properly mixed tracks don't need mastering."
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
You mean they don't need much correction at mastering stage, for sure, but they still need to be mastered one way or another.deep'n'dark wrote:But yeah, I trust "properly mixed tracks don't need mastering."
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? ShawnG
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1378 posts since 8 Feb, 2006
Mastering means that bunch of your tracks are made to sound like an album. I don't think that there's no mixes, that aren't already perfect as they are.Zexila wrote:You mean they don't need much correction at mastering stage, for sure, but they still need to be mastered one way or another.deep'n'dark wrote:But yeah, I trust "properly mixed tracks don't need mastering."
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Well, if one works in 16 bit 44k, it's arguable that using limiter on master bus isn't sort of mastering, even if he does it in the mix process.deep'n'dark wrote:Mastering means that bunch of your tracks are made to sound like an album. I don't think that there's no mixes, that aren't already perfect as they are.Zexila wrote:You mean they don't need much correction at mastering stage, for sure, but they still need to be mastered one way or another.deep'n'dark wrote:But yeah, I trust "properly mixed tracks don't need mastering."
I understand that if you aren't releasing your music to public and using it for your live set's or enjoyment, there's really no need for dithering, but any other way around, mastering is a must.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? ShawnG
- KVRAF
- 4590 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Warsaw
Unless you're making a singleMastering means that bunch of your tracks are made to sound like an album
I use a chain of compressors / limiters for different purposes. Recently found out they are very badly configured, so better not rely on these
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1378 posts since 8 Feb, 2006
Yes yes, I'd let a professional mastering engineer master my work, but I need to do my job first i.e. making music that is worth to master.
-
- KVRAF
- 6254 posts since 25 Mar, 2004
I was using Slate's FG-X, but then Ozone 7 came out and there are some mastering presets on that which really bump up the quality of my sound.
I'm an absolute idiot when it comes to mixing/mastering, etc., so I need all the help I can get.
-B
I'm an absolute idiot when it comes to mixing/mastering, etc., so I need all the help I can get.
-B
Berfab
So many plugins, so little time...
So many plugins, so little time...
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Doesn't meter who masters the music, in majority of cases it needs mastering, that's my point.deep'n'dark wrote:Yes yes, I'd let a professional mastering engineer master my work, but I need to do my job first i.e. making music that is worth to master.
Of course, agree, one should get his mix as best as he can without relying on "it will be fixed in mastering stage", that's general consensus about mixing in general.
Sorry for noticing, but it seems you are back from "fix with mastering" camp and some stuff aren't crystal clear yet, my sincere advice is to visit this whole issue again and build around that new fundamental understanding, everything will fall in place and your mixes will reflect that, we learn our whole life.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? ShawnG
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1378 posts since 8 Feb, 2006
I have tried out something indeed but I aim higher.Zexila wrote:Doesn't meter who masters the music, in majority of cases it needs mastering, that's my point.deep'n'dark wrote:Yes yes, I'd let a professional mastering engineer master my work, but I need to do my job first i.e. making music that is worth to master.
Of course, agree, one should get his mix as best as he can without relying on "it will be fixed in mastering stage", that's general consensus about mixing in general.
Sorry for noticing, but it seems you are back from "fix with mastering" camp and some stuff aren't crystal clear yet, my sincere advice is to visit this whole issue again and build around that new fundamental understanding, everything will fall in place and your mixes will reflect that, we learn our whole life.
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Sorry, I sincerely don't know what you mean by this, if I were rude or douche, I apologize, that wasn't my intention, I'm learning new things every day and my ambitions aren't as high as they were before, but nonetheless appreciate every bit of info that I can use in my advantage, same way love to give back if I can, I'm really not pumping my ego here, just failing in common human interaction, so sorry again.deep'n'dark wrote:I have tried out something indeed but I aim higher.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here? ShawnG
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1378 posts since 8 Feb, 2006
Yeah, no problem. I have made music for 20 years, but I'm also learning (still).Zexila wrote:Sorry, I sincerely don't know what you mean by this, if I were rude or douche, I apologize, that wasn't my intention, I'm learning new things every day and my ambitions aren't as high as they were before, but nonetheless appreciate every bit of info that I can use in my advantage, same way love to give back if I can, I'm really not pumping my ego here, just failing in common human interaction, so sorry again.deep'n'dark wrote:I have tried out something indeed but I aim higher.
- Banned
- 194 posts since 25 Oct, 2015 from Penetanguishene, ON
Why not try my mastering technique - It's all free - Afterall..
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 6&t=451229
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic ... 6&t=451229
- KVRian
- 581 posts since 21 Feb, 2005 from Upper Left USA
The last few years all I use for the mastering phase of my own tracks is a limiter, usually just kissing a couple dB off any peaks. Otherwise I spend all my energy on how the song sounds in the mixdown and sound design phase. To me, mastering is NOTHING except having another set of more experienced ears see if they can improve something you might have missed. That's it. Otherwise, forget "mastering" as a phase you have to do and just work with elements at the level of detail you have available to you.
I've been mastering other people's music for roughly 15 years now, 8 of those full time. Out of the thousands of tracks I've worked on, I can think of a handful that I wasn't able to add at least some tiny bit of enhancement that the artist appreciated. Roughly 5 or 6 tracks that just were dead on as they were, either from flat out perfect mixes for the music, or just because the music was unique enough that there wasn't even anything to reference it against anyway.
I've been mastering other people's music for roughly 15 years now, 8 of those full time. Out of the thousands of tracks I've worked on, I can think of a handful that I wasn't able to add at least some tiny bit of enhancement that the artist appreciated. Roughly 5 or 6 tracks that just were dead on as they were, either from flat out perfect mixes for the music, or just because the music was unique enough that there wasn't even anything to reference it against anyway.