Do you ever think compressors, suck?
-
The_Hidden_Goose The_Hidden_Goose https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=10878
- KVRian
- 945 posts since 8 Dec, 2003 from Birmingham-ish, UK (Tamworth, but shhh!)
It's true that a lot of modern dance stuff really relies on it. But presumably those artists have to deal with the downsides of heavy compression as well and manage to pull it off in a way that works for them and their music.
I *almost* never employ them - preferring to either get the source material as I want it (or as near as damnit), and using EQ and gain automation for most cases, but for the few things I have used them they've been pretty worthwhile. I don't use them enough to buy endless variations on a fairly limited theme, though I can see how someone who makes liberal use of them might.
So I use them but try not to. Sometimes it's the best option.
I *almost* never employ them - preferring to either get the source material as I want it (or as near as damnit), and using EQ and gain automation for most cases, but for the few things I have used them they've been pretty worthwhile. I don't use them enough to buy endless variations on a fairly limited theme, though I can see how someone who makes liberal use of them might.
So I use them but try not to. Sometimes it's the best option.
Q. Why is a mouse when it spins?
A. The higher the fewer.
A. The higher the fewer.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7400 posts since 17 Feb, 2005
This is what bothers me about compression, management. Isn't a compresor supposed to do this? Why must extra steps be taken?The_Hidden_Goose wrote:artists have to deal with the downsides of heavy compression as well and manage to pull it off in a way that works for them and their music.
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
Compressors don't suck at all, but they don't replace a proper Volume automation.camsr wrote:I have a lot to say why I would think this, but honestly I may be totally wrong. I think there could be a more expressive dynamics control device! What I hate about compressors is how they modify the frequency spectrum, making one band sound good at the expense of another. Yet I've never seen one that could make anything sound good all the time. Constant adjustments and judicious knob turning feels like facism to me. Tell me I'm wrong, tell me that compressors are good.
- KVRAF
- 23471 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
jens wrote:But the magic of compressors is elsewhere than mere volume automation...
you couldn't mimick the beloved sound of a (say) 1176 or LA2A with volume automation - not at all.
jens wrote:Yes, and that time is milliseconds and even microseconds... do you really think you can draw automation-envelopes for that?camsr wrote:I think I understand compression quite well. Changing gain over time? There has to be creative limits...
Just so that the facts do not get overlooked /forgotten amongst all the nice philosophical talk...
You wouldn't want to give the impression of just ignoring these facts because you can't counterargue them, would you?
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7400 posts since 17 Feb, 2005
I already replied about automation being tedious on the millisecond level... at least for any suitably long recording. I do that kind of thing all the time on samples.
- KVRian
- 1156 posts since 10 Apr, 2006
That.Autobot wrote: Like the most other (audio) tools the question is always: What do I want to achieve and what is the right tool for it?
e.g. compressors almost do the same thing but whit different approaches (Optical, Variable- MU, FET, VCA, wideband, multiband and so on) to solve the problem and reach the aimed task.
The different approaches (creative and control) aren't mutually exclusive. Extreme compression on individual drum tracks to shape the sound drastically, and then a drum bus comp for more transparent dynamic control is perfectly legit. As is the inverse. As is not using it at all (if you want to maximize an effect's impact, contrast is a great way to do so). It just depends on what you're looking to do, and what process(es) best serve(s) the specific task and big picture.
In terms of bigtime engineers...for some, you'll pry compressors out of their cold dead hands, while others think compression is for sissies. Either side has enough zillion-selling records to make a definitive conclusion impossible. Just use whatever works for you...
That said, I've personally found comp and reverb to be the most common places where i overdo it and foul stuff up. It does take practice, as someone else pointed out.
Feed the children! Preferably to starving wild animals.
--
Pooter | Software | Akai MPK-61 | Line 6 Helix | Dynaudio BM5A mk II
--
Pooter | Software | Akai MPK-61 | Line 6 Helix | Dynaudio BM5A mk II
- KVRAF
- 23471 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
I missed that then, sorry - however I think it is notonly tedious, butoutright impossible - and I even simplified it extremely...camsr wrote:I already replied about automation being tedious on the millisecond level... at least for any suitably long recording. I do that kind of thing all the time on samples.
You can read on the following SKnote explanation for the Stripbus compressor a lot on infor about how complex some hardware compressors actually function and how signal-dependent it works:
http://www.sknote.it/StripBus_HowTo.htm
Even if you had years to spend in order to edit the volume envelope of even just a single track, you would have a really hard time to mimick this behaviour - even if you knew exactly how it works/what it does to the signal
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
-
- KVRist
- 240 posts since 20 Nov, 2003 from Atlanta and Portland
Yes. For a lot of engineers level control is one of the minor uses of compression. You can do that with level rides. The multitude of ways you can change the sound and feel is the main use. Someone I know said "I use it for EQ, reverb, everything but level control"jens wrote: Even if you had years to spend in order to edit the volume envelope of even just a single track, you would have a really hard time to mimick this behaviour - even if you knew exactly how it works/what it does to the signal
- KVRAF
- 23471 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Yes - if I simply want to even out (say) on a vocal track the difference between a quiter verse and a louder chorus, then, yes, volume-automation is for me the way to go - but they way I use compression it affects the sound of the program-material on a per-note basis - which is completely something entirely different altogether - like totally...
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
-
- KVRian
- 673 posts since 6 Dec, 2015
Good luck applying automation for transient correction during live sessions.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7400 posts since 17 Feb, 2005
A question came up in another thread, it was "why don't more compressors have mix knobs?"
It is obviously a marketing strategy. By crossfading good compression with the input, it's subconsciously interpreted as rejecting the product! And then users may not talk about it as much as another product, which is bad.
It is obviously a marketing strategy. By crossfading good compression with the input, it's subconsciously interpreted as rejecting the product! And then users may not talk about it as much as another product, which is bad.
- KVRAF
- 23471 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Are you actually serious?
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
Are you joking?camsr wrote:A question came up in another thread, it was "why don't more compressors have mix knobs?"
It is obviously a marketing strategy. By crossfading good compression with the input, it's subconsciously interpreted as rejecting the product! And then users may not talk about it as much as another product, which is bad.
Another thing about compressors - they all produce distortion - which is actually what I want from them as well as control. Volume automation is not going to get you that.