Decent zero latency cpu efficient tracking reverb?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2802 posts since 22 Mar, 2006 from cornwall
Hi,
I'm looking for a decent quality for tracking vocals with zero latency and as low a strain on cpu resources as possible.
What would you recommend?
I'm looking for a decent quality for tracking vocals with zero latency and as low a strain on cpu resources as possible.
What would you recommend?
- KVRAF
- 23077 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Anything Valhalla, but I'd start with ValhallaPlate for vox.
- KVRAF
- 1793 posts since 9 Apr, 2011
-
comfortablynick comfortablynick https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=358558
- KVRist
- 234 posts since 15 May, 2015
Exponential Audio reverbs are very efficient and are the best ITB reverbs today IMO. They do have 32 samples of latency, which equates to a .7 millisecond delay if working at 44.1 kHz. That drops to .3 ms at 96 kHz. This kind of latency would never matter with reverb, especially since some kind of pre-delay is often used.
The Valhalla are great too. They don't report latency to the host, but I'm pretty sure Sean said he just folds the latency into the pre-delay time. So there really is a tiny bit, but it appears as zero.
Why is zero latency important to you in a reverb? Can you give an example? I never track vocals without a healthy dose of pre-delay, which is an order of magnitude more delay than the latency would cause.
The Valhalla are great too. They don't report latency to the host, but I'm pretty sure Sean said he just folds the latency into the pre-delay time. So there really is a tiny bit, but it appears as zero.
Why is zero latency important to you in a reverb? Can you give an example? I never track vocals without a healthy dose of pre-delay, which is an order of magnitude more delay than the latency would cause.
-
- KVRAF
- 4709 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
Valhalla!
VintageVerb has basically no latency (says Zero in my DAW but that's impossible, right?) and uses around 1% per instance on my i5.
VintageVerb has basically no latency (says Zero in my DAW but that's impossible, right?) and uses around 1% per instance on my i5.
- KVRist
- 158 posts since 24 Jun, 2016 from Austin, Texas
Is you are in Pro Tools, D-Verb works great. You can use it as a send of just adjust the Dry/Wet on an Insert. Third Party, I am a fan of iZotope's Nectar and also Waves IR-L. Between those 3 I think that gives some flexibility in options for a nice Room/Plate verb for vocal tracking.
DJ brimLo
DJ | Artist | Producer
DJ | Artist | Producer
-
comfortablynick comfortablynick https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=358558
- KVRist
- 234 posts since 15 May, 2015
I guess I don't really get what's so great about the reverb in Nectar. ValhallaPlate sounds so much better to me (love the Cobalt algorithm; it nails the EMT 140 resonance IMO). I prefer the sound of Abbey Road Plates, too...just not the CPU usage.