Repro-1 (out now)

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic

To your ears, which filter behaves most analogue

1
86
22%
2
28
7%
3
87
22%
4
117
30%
5
72
18%
 
Total votes: 390

RELATED
PRODUCTS
Repro

Post

Urs wrote:
HunterKiller wrote:Yeah that does sound great, but I've been doing this kind of raw in your face sound with TimewARP2600 for ten years now.
The Pro-One came on the market 11 years after the Arp 2600. Repro-1 comes on the market 11 years after TimewARP2600...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ssnw2GA657s
:tu:
"The educated person is one who knows how to find out what he does not know" - George Simmel
“It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.” - John Wooden

Post

Urs wrote:That said, we've studied the shit out of this thing. I don't think there's much we missed.
Quote of the week, for me! :tu:

I wonder if the sequencer does all the stuff the custom retrofit UC-1 Pro One sequencer did..?
http://www.muzines.co.uk/articles/uc-1-sequencer/1754

Post

beely wrote:
Urs wrote:That said, we've studied the shit out of this thing. I don't think there's much we missed.
Quote of the week, for me! :tu:

I wonder if the sequencer does all the stuff the custom retrofit UC-1 Pro One sequencer did..?
http://www.muzines.co.uk/articles/uc-1-sequencer/1754
Nope, we haven't had that... the sequencer in Repro-1 is however a good deal more capable than the original one. It's much like Hive's with two sequences and Velocity support.

Post

Urs wrote:
beely wrote:
Urs wrote:That said, we've studied the shit out of this thing. I don't think there's much we missed.
Quote of the week, for me! :tu:

I wonder if the sequencer does all the stuff the custom retrofit UC-1 Pro One sequencer did..?
http://www.muzines.co.uk/articles/uc-1-sequencer/1754
Nope, we haven't had that... the sequencer in Repro-1 is however a good deal more capable than the original one. It's much like Hive's with two sequences and Velocity support.
That sounds good...Hive's sequencer is great :tu:

Post

Cinebient wrote:
Urs wrote:
HunterKiller wrote:Yeah that does sound great, but I've been doing this kind of raw in your face sound with TimewARP2600 for ten years now.
The Pro-One came on the market 11 years after the Arp 2600. Repro-1 comes on the market 11 years after TimewARP2600...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ssnw2GA657s
Yes, but that says nothing before we can use it in real. I still find the Moog Model 15 app (yeah i know it's another beast) to have a raw power which none of the desktop plug-ins offer.
I hope Repro-1 can change this.
I think your assessment is influenced by stuff other than sound quality.

Post

pdxindy wrote:
Cinebient wrote:
Urs wrote:
HunterKiller wrote:Yeah that does sound great, but I've been doing this kind of raw in your face sound with TimewARP2600 for ten years now.
The Pro-One came on the market 11 years after the Arp 2600. Repro-1 comes on the market 11 years after TimewARP2600...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ssnw2GA657s
Yes, but that says nothing before we can use it in real. I still find the Moog Model 15 app (yeah i know it's another beast) to have a raw power which none of the desktop plug-ins offer.
I hope Repro-1 can change this.
I think your assessment is influenced by stuff other than sound quality.
And why do you think that? (maybe you are right)
You think Model 15 has no good sound quality? For me it has :D
Sure it has and of course Repro-1 too.
I mean it seems to be a personal flavour of course.

Post

At this point I'm almost extra glad that all this won't clutter up your proper repro-1 thread, Urs! :scared: :lol:

Post

Cinebient wrote:
pdxindy wrote:
I think your assessment is influenced by stuff other than sound quality.
And why do you think that? (maybe you are right)
You think Model 15 has no good sound quality? For me it has :D
Sure it has and of course Repro-1 too.
I mean it seems to be a personal flavour of course.
The Model 15 has good sound quality. I think it is not as good as say Reaktor Blocks though.

Post

pdxindy wrote:The Model 15 has good sound quality. I think it is not as good as say Reaktor Blocks though.
Agreed. For starters, it doesn't run at 96k. :)

Post

Taron wrote:At this point I'm almost extra glad that all this won't clutter up your proper repro-1 thread, Urs! :scared: :lol:
Well, there is not much to talk about regarding RePro-1 since it is not publicly available yet.

I'm sitting here playing it this morning. It sounds great, has lots of character and zest without digital harsh and is easy to use. I can imagine making whole compositions just with RePro-1 even though it is a mono synth.

Post

EvilDragon wrote:
pdxindy wrote:The Model 15 has good sound quality. I think it is not as good as say Reaktor Blocks though.
Agreed. For starters, it doesn't run at 96k. :)
I don't know if that's possible maybe when using an audio device which offers that.
However, it has a ton of tricks included (beside sound quality), especially for performence and having 96k is not important for me anyway.
Model 15 is polyphonic (4 voice) on top (MPE mode too).
I don't own Reaktor but i love a few synths from it like Prism.
I would love to own it but i'm too scared my computer (and i) couldn't handle it :lol:

Post

pdxindy wrote:
Taron wrote:At this point I'm almost extra glad that all this won't clutter up your proper repro-1 thread, Urs! :scared: :lol:
Well, there is not much to talk about regarding RePro-1 since it is not publicly available yet.
All the better, if we get all this out of our system now then, hehehe. :hihi:
pdxindy wrote: I'm sitting here playing it this morning. It sounds great, has lots of character and zest without digital harsh and is easy to use. I can imagine making whole compositions just with RePro-1 even though it is a mono synth.
Again, I'm very curious, too. I must say, though, after months and months of making OSC tracks again, I have to relearn to be picky about the finer qualities of a beautiful synth. If something will make a big difference to me, it's "organic" expressiveness, something that has the spectrum and range to project what I wish to express.
Most synths fall apart in one way or another on exactly that quest, revealing a stale nature or some sort of acoustic instability.
I have already started writing my own first vst and went straight for entirely procedural waveforms, which has amazing power in terms of range and consistency, but filter programming is very, very tricky. I'm quite stunned by the subtle complexity of Urs' filters, very alive, very rich. I wished I could get a slice of that, haha, and see if I can make those musically more active for such things as keeping the resonance tuned, tracking with the note frequencies just the way I have it in mine, but beyond that mine just suck! :lol: :dog: ...well, they are simply ridiculous compared to the glorious character of anything from Urs, I'm afraid. :pray:

Anyway, yeah, I am really looking forward to playing around with the first version of repro-1 I can get my hands on! :hyper:

Post

Taron wrote:Anyway, yeah, I am really looking forward to playing around with the first version of repro-1 I can get my hands on! :hyper:
No you can't put your hands on it. You can't touch it. No touchy, no feely, no grabby. You can't touch this. Only looky and heary. Maybe poke it with your mouse.
:hyper: M O N O S Y N T H S F O R E V E R :hyper:

Post

It must've been very traumatizing to you, when you first encountered internet porn. :tantrum: :hihi:

Post

Off topic!
:hyper: M O N O S Y N T H S F O R E V E R :hyper:

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”