Hey, I appreciate that you are building your own setup and if it suits, good for you.100F wrote: Well the way i've approached this is using high resolution rotary encoders and i actually have two sets of 5 which makes ten. one above the other.
each of these sets can change banks independently, so the top row can edit the filter freq, res, env amt, trackint etc.. while the other set does the filter envelope, but if you press one of the buttons to change banks it changes to amp env while the other set remains locked to filter settings.
one knob per parameter isnt always the best, cause it takes a lot of space. And sometimes having to actually scan across the interfase for a particular knob takes more time than it should.
I will probably upload a video of my conceptual controller once i give it a nice looking case, since its basically too ugly (but useful) in its current state. I made it with arduino.
Im really interested in pushing a new paradigm of usability for vsts, i think we're already there in terms of sound, there are tons of great sounding plugins out there, but the user experience is still lacking.
cheers!
One knob per parameter (or close to) is my favorite for hardware and I do not care about using some space.
As for VST's, I have no interest whatsoever in such a setup. Tried some things like that and I find the mouse and a big screen far faster and more satisfying than paging through dozens of sets of parameters on small limited devices.
That is why it is good that there are various possibilities for different peoples interest.