Software iLok - recover licences from scrapped PC
- KVRAF
- 4431 posts since 15 Nov, 2006 from Hell
OK, "problems" may have been too strong a word. "trade-offs" is more accurate.
I don't know what to write here that won't be censored, as I can only speak in profanity.
-
- KVRAF
- 3477 posts since 27 Dec, 2002 from North East England
It is worth checking with the plug-in vendor. I accidentally bought a soft iLok plug-in (Plugin Boutique just said it was "C/R protection" in the store) and asked around here about it. Most people said that AIR will give you a second license if your activation is lost, so that was enough to for me to keep it. I didn't see the problems that soft iLok users had coming with Windows 10 updates on the other hand, but I've always been able to deactivate and reactivate before big Win 10 updates land by keeping an eye on release dates.Pytchblend wrote:Thanks for all your replies. Looks like I need the bloody hardware iLok
(and I have no hope of recovering that lost activation, it would seem.)
I've been keeping up with this as I'm interested (but not skilled) in computer security and copy protection and the like. As far as I know, only plugs offering the software iLok option were broken (claimed to be "48 hours work"), and only a very small number were released publicly as proof on one day. Kinda like "we've broken this and here's the proof, we are the best in the scene, we've done iLok and we're moving on to the next thing now". I don't think these guys are particularly interested in giving people outside their 'scene' free plugs to use, they just want to be seen as more skilled than rival groups. They were only ever interested in the protection, not the plug-ins.BTW, i miss the "heads up" from the people that always claimed that iLok has been cracked now, so there's no more point for companies to use it. Wonder what happened to that. I guess they stuffed the security hole in the meantime, so there's no more mentioning it.
edit: Robotmonkey tells me the above is actually bollocks. See below.
Last edited by cron on Tue Jun 27, 2017 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 2374 posts since 16 Jan, 2013
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 690 posts since 4 Jul, 2011 from England
Yes, I've used both activations and one is currently working here, fortunately. I just wanted to call the other back in case my hard drive fails.
-
- KVRian
- 1000 posts since 25 Feb, 2008 from Sydney, Australia
The Russian sites are absolutely festooned with ilok2 snapped plugins.chk071 wrote:BTW, i miss the "heads up" from the people that always claimed that iLok has been cracked now, so there's no more point for companies to use it. Wonder what happened to that. I guess they stuffed the security hole in the meantime, so there's no more mentioning it.
If I was a dev that paid big bickies for ilok2 security, and I found it snapped on a Russian site..
Eventide is one example. Why do they just accept this?
Do pace settle matters like this, or just release ikok4 and enjoy another "cycle"?
Prestissimo in Moto Perpetuo
-
UltimateOutsider UltimateOutsider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=216800
- KVRian
- 810 posts since 5 Oct, 2009 from Portland, OR
There is no such thing as uncrackable copy protection. Many software vendors will tell you that DRM is most important during the first few weeks/months after a product release when the biggest potential wave of sales happens. Publishers assume their products will get cracked/leaked eventually, they just invest in DRM to delay the inevitable and to inhibit casual piracy.Melkor wrote:If I was a dev that paid big bickies for ilok2 security, and I found it snapped on a Russian site..
Eventide is one example. Why do they just accept this?
Do pace settle matters like this, or just release ikok4 and enjoy another "cycle"?
-
- KVRAF
- 3477 posts since 27 Dec, 2002 from North East England
Yeah, protection that stays uncracked for several years is a massive success. It's no secret that I dislike iLok as a hobbyist (the dongle is the price of another plug-in, the software version seems extremely risky if your computer fails), but I have to give them credit for that.chk071 wrote:Yeah. It also seems to be quickly forgotten that iLok WASN'T cracked before that.
-
- KVRAF
- 2677 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
There's absolutely no change in that. New versions of cracked ilok plugins are released constantly. For example the PSP plugins that were moved to ilok were cracked the following day. So no point in being smug about owning an ilok.chk071 wrote:BTW, i miss the "heads up" from the people that always claimed that iLok has been cracked now, so there's no more point for companies to use it. Wonder what happened to that. I guess they stuffed the security hole in the meantime, so there's no more mentioning it.
No signature here!
-
- KVRAF
- 2677 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
That is just patently false information. If you are interested in software security and drm, you should get better sources.cron wrote:As far as I know, only plugs offering the software iLok option were broken (claimed to be "48 hours work"), and only a very small number were released publicly as proof on one day. Kinda like "we've broken this and here's the proof, we are the best in the scene, we've done iLok and we're moving on to the next thing now". I don't think these guys are particularly interested in giving people outside their 'scene' free plugs to use, they just want to be seen as more skilled than rival groups. They were only ever interested in the protection, not the plug-ins.
Pretty much every plugin using ilok has been cracked and released. No difference whatsoever in weather it used soft or hardware ilok. Some of the released plugins have never even had soft ilok option.
No signature here!
-
- KVRAF
- 2677 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
Even though iLok deserves the credit for how long it was holding on, it was probably more to do with the changes in the release scene than the inherent superiority of iLok.cron wrote:Yeah, protection that stays uncracked for several years is a massive success. It's no secret that I dislike iLok as a hobbyist (the dongle is the price of another plug-in, the software version seems extremely risky if your computer fails), but I have to give them credit for that.chk071 wrote:Yeah. It also seems to be quickly forgotten that iLok WASN'T cracked before that.
No signature here!
- KVRAF
- 4431 posts since 15 Nov, 2006 from Hell
yep, more-or-less skilled crackers (think those who did the Syncrosoft dongle emulator) disappeared from the scene a long time ago, only kiddies remain. i wonder who those new guys are.
I don't know what to write here that won't be censored, as I can only speak in profanity.
-
- KVRAF
- 3477 posts since 27 Dec, 2002 from North East England
Oh man, really? Damn. I guess I just saw the initial day-1 flood followed by nothing for a week, then stopped paying attention and assumed the best. The buzz at the time seemed to indicate all the day-1 releases had a soft iLok option, but frankly I don't even trust my memory on that now.robotmonkey wrote:That is just patently false information. If you are interested in software security and drm, you should get better sources.cron wrote:As far as I know, only plugs offering the software iLok option were broken (claimed to be "48 hours work"), and only a very small number were released publicly as proof on one day. Kinda like "we've broken this and here's the proof, we are the best in the scene, we've done iLok and we're moving on to the next thing now". I don't think these guys are particularly interested in giving people outside their 'scene' free plugs to use, they just want to be seen as more skilled than rival groups. They were only ever interested in the protection, not the plug-ins.
Pretty much every plugin using ilok has been cracked and released. No difference whatsoever in weather it used soft or hardware ilok. Some of the released plugins have never even had soft ilok option.
Quite embarrassing that. Probably one of my larger KVR clangers. Apologies for the duff info, and thanks for the correction.
-
- KVRAF
- 5716 posts since 8 Jun, 2009
Not necessarily. We're not talking about the most honest members of society here. If something is advertised as a 'crack', it doesn't mean the payload contains anything related to the original product. Without running a virtual machine and preferably on a firewalled physical machine, you'd be insane to check inside half of that stuff. A better indication of what actually got cracked (short of donning the protective suit) is buzz on the forums that surround that community.cron wrote:Quite embarrassing that. Probably one of my larger KVR clangers. Apologies for the duff info, and thanks for the correction.
-
- KVRAF
- 35410 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
robotmonkey wrote:So no point in being smug about owning an ilok.
Okey dokey, my fellow iLok hater dude. BTW, i'm quite impressed about your knowledge of warez, and all that. Let me guess, you did extensive studies in that field, because it was such a interesting topic for you. Amiright?