Agreed. Perception is critical to timbre. My hypothesis is that if you play a random listener an entirely synthetic sound and alter the EQ they will likely perceive a change in timbre much more quickly than if it a sound from a recognisable object, such as a bell or guitar string. The bell I would guess changes perceived timbre with EQ much more quickly than with the guitar or cymbal, because the brain is spending a lot of its effort on pitch and the relative harmonics. The brain might not notice inharmonic overtones in the bell until some of the louder, lower tones are removed.liv wrote:I believe timbre is a somewhat subjective term.
Lets say you have a piece of wood and piece of metal.
When you hit them you hear what is what. If you EQ them you will still hear what is what, although the frequencies are altered. Depending on the amount of EQ I would call it a change on timbre aswell, but the "origin" of the sound and so the differences between wood and metal would still be distinguishable (to a certain point perhaps).
2 cent.
Someone was doing a research project and posted some tests here a month or two back that I think was related to perception of timbre. I'm sure there's literature on timbral perception but haven't looked recently.