Cubase 9.5 launch today!
-
- KVRist
- 311 posts since 9 Oct, 2013 from uk
And by all accounts, there's more goodness to come in a v9.5.10 maintenance update, in just a few weeks time..! Its got lots of bug fixes, apparently...
Win10; i7 4790K; 16Gb RAM; GTX750Ti; Cubase Pro v13.0.30; WaveLab Pro v11.2.0; S1 v6.5.2; UR44 audio/MIDI
-
- KVRian
- 591 posts since 19 Aug, 2012
Love this update! Live Suite with Push 2 is my main DAW, but I always love to have a little taste of Cubase here and there. Both are German's and both have copies (Bitwig and Studio One < inspiring one another ) With my plugin collection the elements is perfect, don't need most of the additional synths and fxs, especially since I'm more into Falcon rather than Halion and own the Beat Agent 4 and Retrologue 2 already. Update from 8 is only 19.99 EU and gives 64bit mixing and another Wavetable synth to compliment the new Ableton's Wavetable.VitaminD wrote:Elements gets the 64bit audio engine, automation updates, video engine, halion sonic 3 with some 'flux wavetable synth', and a couple other smaller things.
The same with Wavelab Elements, update from LE 8 (Free) to Elements 9.5 is only 29.99 EU which can be used as a dedicated audio editor in both Cubase and Live. With an even cheaper upgrade price from 9.5 to 10, for just 19.99 EU usually. I own Ozone 8 Advanced, but started with Wavelab and for certain ocassions still love to do mastering in there. Both are complementing each other nicely for a mastering purpose.
I'm not updating with every version being released, only for a very interesting one. But so glad with the options. With Live Suite 10 and Cubase/Wavelab Elements 9.5 my life is complete. I started with the DOS version of Cakewalk, but currently have no interest with other DAWs, only those two. Both provide a very different approach and an exciting development that I really enjoy to catch-up with.
Last edited by crystalmsc on Fri Nov 17, 2017 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kaossilatron - Voicillator
Station: Ableton Live 10 Suite, Obscurium, Push 2, Ultranova, MS-20m, Wavedrums
Station: Ableton Live 10 Suite, Obscurium, Push 2, Ultranova, MS-20m, Wavedrums
- KVRian
- 513 posts since 22 Sep, 2015
I really don't understand this logic of happy clapping shitty business practices.thebutler wrote:And by all accounts, there's more goodness to come in a v9.5.10 maintenance update, in just a few weeks time..! Its got lots of bug fixes, apparently...
Steinberg knowingly released a bugged paid update. They claimed they'd already fixed the bugs on release day so why then is the update not already released?
This stinks of Steinberg holding back fixes in order to thicken out their softube console 1 update for after the new year.
-
- KVRist
- 311 posts since 9 Oct, 2013 from uk
@wickfut wrote '..I really don't understand this logic..'
There's only so many testers, and only so many features/bugs each can physically test per day... what they've released, at this point, is perfectly good fun and stable; so that yes, they can earn some money.! Nothing 'shitty' about that.
And it doesn't 'stink' that a company holds-back some fixes, a certain feature, or some nice other tweaks to a later update. They'd never release anything if they waited for everything to be fixed/included before trying to sell you something.
There's only so many testers, and only so many features/bugs each can physically test per day... what they've released, at this point, is perfectly good fun and stable; so that yes, they can earn some money.! Nothing 'shitty' about that.
And it doesn't 'stink' that a company holds-back some fixes, a certain feature, or some nice other tweaks to a later update. They'd never release anything if they waited for everything to be fixed/included before trying to sell you something.
Win10; i7 4790K; 16Gb RAM; GTX750Ti; Cubase Pro v13.0.30; WaveLab Pro v11.2.0; S1 v6.5.2; UR44 audio/MIDI
- KVRian
- 513 posts since 22 Sep, 2015
that's pure speculation on your part about the inner workings of the software company.thebutler wrote:
There's only so many testers, and only so many features/bugs each can physically test per day... what they've released, at this point, is perfectly good fun and stable; so that yes, they can earn some money.! Nothing 'shitty' about that.
It's "perfectly good fun and stable" so long as you don't trigger the bugs and crash the thing.
Claiming to know about bugs on release day, claiming to have already spent time fixing some of them, but releasing early with a version without those fixes is about as shitty as you can get.
and this is the point I'll just cut you off as it's not worth continuing any further discussion with you. This is £500 software we're talking about, not some free demoware junk.And it doesn't 'stink' that a company holds-back some fixes......
- KVRian
- 513 posts since 22 Sep, 2015
No. But it does show Halion 6, Dark Planet etc. Probably the same as in 9cranium wrote:Does the browser also show your 3rd party VST's as images?
-
- KVRian
- 540 posts since 8 Jul, 2009
The Direct Offline Processing window streamlines my workflow. Of course, the 'plugin process' key commands are quicker.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7WVKo3XDTk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7WVKo3XDTk
-
- KVRAF
- 6419 posts since 22 Jan, 2005 from Sweden
Agree fully on that one - is there some new blood in management that really inspire all staff like never before, or?vespesian wrote:It's as though Steinberg suddenly woke up, because 9.5 is really good. I'm actually kinda surprised.
I just had a look at my long awaited custom click patterns things - and absolutely love it.
This was a biggy for me - freedom to create any feel in clicks for any situation.
And how easy you create a click track as well - well done.
Then you always have it there no matter where you start transport.
Rather than using pre-roll or count-in I just make markers on a special recording marker track where I want to start - so could be in the middle of a bar. And using count-in you always jumped back to full bar.
Only things left - that is really needed:
a) full context help - and no need to be online to get anything.
It's pdf manual now - and even find that rather good in last years - but to just rightclick or a helpbutton everywhere in dialogs etc - and just get into help for that part.
ProTools made their own help system and it works really well. So they are independent on platform. So relying on Windows help - one can see the difficulty in redoing very different thing on Mac. Just make you own help system for Cubase.
b) restore support staff to levels it used to be
One thing to have peaks for certain period after release for a product - but constantly having almost unresponsive support is not what you expect if to aspire to professionals and for real compete with ProTools.
It could be staff more present on Issue-forum for a dialog - that would be superb.
We are all in this together - users/cstuomers and developers - and everybody wins.
- KVRAF
- 6095 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
Preset for DOP is a huge +1 ... I don't know why I didn't think of solving that with Patchworks. GREAT IDEA, thank you for standing in for my brain.kiezum wrote:The only thing I'm missing in Direct Offline Processing is presets! But that could be solved with Blue Cat Audio Patchwork.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRist
- 267 posts since 2 Nov, 2015
Here's a quick test someone did: https://www.steinberg.net/forums/viewto ... 0&t=126461SJ_Digriz wrote:Where did you hear such a thing? The 64 bit processing only happens with a the steinberg plugins and a couple others and has nothing to do with ASIO load. And, it takes a tiny bit MORE CPU.Romantique Tp wrote:There have been reports about 64-bit summing reducing ASIO/CPU load. This might depend on the plugins used.
Cubase is the most fully featured DAW around, but its strongest points are MIDI, virtual instrument handling and other composer-oriented features.5Lives wrote:So for those that have tried 9.5 and have other DAWs, how does Cubase compare now? To Logic X? To Pro Tools 12.8.2?
I feel these three all are pretty similar now in terms of features (maybe PT has less production-focused features, but that doesn't stop producers from using it). So which one to choose?
Pro Tools is pretty barebones, and is almost entirely dedicated to audio recording and mixing. Cubase makes Pro Tools look freeware when it comes to MIDI or anything related to composing.
Logic is the DAW that's the closest to Cubase, but I feel that Logic has always been several steps behind. Cubase again does MIDI better, and audio editing is overall more robust.
- KVRAF
- 6095 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
He's delusional. The 64bit processing isn't even being used in his scenario he describes.Romantique Tp wrote: Here's a quick test someone did: https://www.steinberg.net/forums/viewto ... 0&t=126461
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer