Plug-ins, Hosts, Apps,
Hardware, Soundware
Developers
(Brands)
Videos Groups
Whats's in?
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Music Search
KVR
   
KVR Forum » Muse Research and Development
Thread Read
How's everyone getting on with the Receptor?
UnUnUnium
KVRer
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:59 pm reply with quote
Hello everyone. This Post is for those who have purchased a REceptor- I am wondering what people's experiences have been with it; More specifically, I am wondering about things like latency and stability....
How much like a hardware synth does the receptor behave? FOr instance, when the receptor hittng high CPU usage, does it become increasingly unstable, or emit cracks and pops, zippering, or other softsynth unpleasantness? Has anyone experienced seemingly random crashes or other stability problems in the course of normal operations (when using approved plug-ins)?? Is latency within unnoticable ranges (can you actually PLAY it as an instrument?), while still using it multitimbrally?
Just wondering...Very interested in the receptor, but still seems to good to be true.....
thanks, UUU
^ Joined: 01 Sep 2004  Member: #39296  
Meffy
Skunk Mod
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:02 pm reply with quote
Apology for this non-answer. Just wanted to say that's one heavy nick you've got there. And howdy. *bow*

Meffy
^ Joined: 10 Jun 2004  Member: #29021  Location: Pony Pasture
Scot Solida
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:24 pm reply with quote
The Receptor's latency is on a par with a hardware synth. I compared it to many of my own, and posted the results here:

http://www.kvr-vst.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60908

As you can see, the Receptor was faster than my Prophecy, which was sold as a lead synth. No trouble at all playing this thing live.

All in all, Receptor is coming along nicely for me. I edit it from my Mac using the remote. I have been using both the included plugs and some unsupported plugs (like the Computer Music and Krakli stuff). Pretty dang neat.

I have also copied all of my E-Mu Soundfonts as well as many of my own samples onto the hard drive. SFZ makes a great front end for Soundfonts. Neat.

I gotta plonk down the dough for the MTron Collection on Receptor soon!
----
There are rocketships outside of my window. Really: www.cosmo.org
www.theelectronicgarden.com
^ Joined: 20 Mar 2002  Member: #2201  Location: Hutchinson, Kansas
ianweb123
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 4:02 pm reply with quote
Scot Solida wrote:
.. and Krakli stuff...


I wonder??... Wink
^ Joined: 03 Nov 2002  Member: #4449  Location: Kettering UK
Scot Solida
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 4:05 pm reply with quote
Love cough-YAVA-cough Love
----
There are rocketships outside of my window. Really: www.cosmo.org
www.theelectronicgarden.com
^ Joined: 20 Mar 2002  Member: #2201  Location: Hutchinson, Kansas
jerrymcp
KVRer
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:33 am reply with quote
UnUnUnium wrote:
How much like a hardware synth does the receptor behave? FOr instance, when the receptor hittng high CPU usage, does it become increasingly unstable, or emit cracks and pops, zippering, or other softsynth unpleasantness?


Just going thru the factory patches I've noticed that the CPU usage can easily get too high- then I get cracks and pops. Would more RAM take care of that?
----
Signature blocked until 5 posts made
^ Joined: 27 Nov 2004  Member: #49469  Location: nashville, tn
UnUnUnium
KVRer
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 1:11 pm reply with quote
Thanks for the responses all....The hardware synth comparisons are a real help..I don't remeber feeling bogged down with the prophecy, so the latency part should be all good. SOunds like it's going pretty well..Though that last response worries me a bit...Clicks and pops have made me run screaming from softsynth land in the past, preferring to simply run out of voices when I run out of voices on my hardware, instead of having to adjust my system as I go along...Has anyone experienced clicks/pops/zippering, then alleviated them through additional RAM, latency settings?
Oh, and thanks Meffy..Heavy indeed, eh?
UUU
^ Joined: 01 Sep 2004  Member: #39296  
DanTimis
MUSEician
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 6:46 pm reply with quote
Additional RAM helps a lot. So does setting a larger buffer size, but that increases latency. Some people may be happy even with the largest buffer size.

I'm definitely biased, since I work for Muse Research, but it seems to me that Receptor is very predictable. You should not experiment with new patches on stage, but if you set your patches in the studio and they don't crack, they will behave the same 99.9% of the time. Nothing is absolutely sure when you deal with plug-ins from many different companies.
----
Dan Timis
Software Developer
Muse Research, Inc.
^ Joined: 20 Aug 2004  Member: #37764  Location: California
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Printable version
Page 1 of 1
Display posts from previous:   
ReplyNew TopicPrevious TopicNext Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Username: Password:  
KVR Developer Challenge 2012