|
|||
http://www.cockos.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10718 http://www.cockos.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10767  ---- [====[\\\\\\\\]>------, Ay caramba ! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Member: #43882 Location: Poland | ||
|
|||
IMHO it actually still is, but this kind of stuff is rather subjective, isn't it? ^^ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Member: #54215 | ||
|
|||
Definately one of the nicest attempts so far. But still a case of "nice face, shame about the rest". There's so many things GUI-wise screaming for attention that it looks awfully busy and distracting. Definately some good quality design skill in there, but sadly it's lost in an incredibly crushed interface. just imho.  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Member: #93293 Location: UK | ||
|
|||
It looks a little less ugly, but ugly nonetheless. I'd say the prettiest looking reaper GUI was done by whitetie (not released yet). |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Member: #60702 | ||
|
|||
Looks really nice to my eyes. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Member: #111770 | ||
|
|||
sQeetz wrote: IMHO it actually still is, but this kind of stuff is rather subjective, isn't it? ^^
Yeah, I find it uglier than before, but to each their own. [edit] just had a look at the Cockos forum, I'm glad to see advanced theming put in. And I like the Coffee & Cream 2 skin much better than the one posted above. ----  Last edited by shamann on Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:13 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Member: #8541 Location: Toronto | ||
|
|||
Not bad, not bad, 6/10. 
But let me ask a stupid question.  If the REAPER developer is as rich he could 'buy out Steinberg from Yamaha' why not hire a good (or the best!) graphic designer studio (e.g. BitPlant) to make the most slickest überGUI what a Host can have?  This is still in the the mediocre range IMHO.  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Apr 2004 Member: #21638 Location: Hungary | ||
|
|||
fandango wrote: Definately one of the nicest attempts so far. But still a case of "nice face, shame about the rest". There's so many things GUI-wise screaming for attention that it looks awfully busy and distracting. Definately some good quality design skill in there, but sadly it's lost in an incredibly crushed interface. just imho.
+1. exactly my thoughts. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Member: #60702 | ||
|
|||
neilpullen wrote: Looks really nice to my eyes.
+1 
keyman_sam wrote: It looks a little less ugly, but ugly nonetheless.
Come on people - it is just an example - think about all the new possibilities ! 
keyman_sam wrote: I'd say the prettiest looking reaper GUI was done by whitetie (not released yet).
A little bit too pretty IMHO. 
Tastes ! Haha ! ---- [====[\\\\\\\\]>------, Ay caramba ! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Member: #43882 Location: Poland | ||
|
|||
double post ---- [====[\\\\\\\\]>------, Ay caramba ! Last edited by Mutant on Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:23 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Member: #43882 Location: Poland | ||
|
|||
triple post !!!  ---- [====[\\\\\\\\]>------, Ay caramba ! Last edited by Mutant on Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Member: #43882 Location: Poland | ||
|
|||
I like it - well done
I particularly like the square button icons. One of the best icon sets - definitely Going to d/l and install thanx = kev ---- Member 12, 8 core laptop, Maschine, Alchemy***, Massive, Taylor 814ce Acoustic Guitar, Crafter Acoustic Bass, Presonus Studio One v2 (love it to bits) RMX, Sylenth (sold), Blue (neglected), Omnisphere, DCAM, Kontakt (now upgraded) |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Oct 2000 Member: #14 Location: skelmersdale, west lancs, uk | ||
|
|||
I have not seen the extent of the new skinning capabilities, but I hope the long-term plan is to make the layout fairly open to the complete rearrangement of layout and controls. I find some of the control areas, like the mixer, a bit jumbled together. ---- |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Member: #8541 Location: Toronto | ||
|
|||
Hmm.. since when did "pretty graphics"/skinning = GUI? GUI = graphical user interface. I thought the UI part included such things as, layout, control, behavior to mouse/keyboard input etc.
I think those screens are way too busy and distracting. Kind of reminds me of why I don't like the GUI of Sonar at all. Cheers! bManic ---- "He who asks is a fool for five minutes, he who does not ask remains a fool forever" |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Member: #5744 Location: Finland, Espoo | ||
|
|||
bmanic wrote: I think those screens are way too busy and distracting. Kind of reminds me of why I don't like the GUI of Sonar at all. Cheers! bManic Then choose one like this: 
There are so many possibilities now... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 May 2006 Member: #108269 |
| KVR Forum Index » Hosts (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.) | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
