|
|||
As it says on the tin.. any news on this?
Cheers Johan |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Sep 2007 Member: #160035 Location: london | ||
|
|||
Hi Johan,
If we do go ahead with AAX it will be for Alchemy v2.0, which will be released later on this year. Alchemy 2.0 will be a paid upgrade from v1.x. AAX support is quite likely to happen with 2.0, but as you know we don't like to make promises and leave users hanging if this turns out to be incorrect. Martin |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Member: #110319 Location: Cornwall, UK | ||
|
|||
Thank you for the clarification.
J |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Sep 2007 Member: #160035 Location: london | ||
|
|||
MWSOS wrote: Hi Johan,
If we do go ahead with AAX it will be for Alchemy v2.0, which will be released later on this year. Alchemy 2.0 will be a paid upgrade from v1.x. AAX support is quite likely to happen with 2.0, but as you know we don't like to make promises and leave users hanging if this turns out to be incorrect. Martin ---- "What embecile composed this list :/" |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 24 Feb 2004 Member: #13718 | ||
|
|||
I bought Alchemy recently. Have loved the sounds so far, but it has been a little hard on my processor. Would be great if Camel can convert to AAX to make the plug in's more efficient. Sooner the better! I'm also holding off buying new camel sounds bc I don't know if/when I can use them if I upgrade to PT 11. I will definitely build my Camel library if AAX is supported. For what incentive thats worth. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Jun 2013 Member: #306490 |
| KVR Forum Index » Camel Audio | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group








