Latest News: rs-met updates EngineersFilter and EasyQ
|
|||
OK - so in the past 2-3 weeks, i gave my website a little facelifting. i hope, it now looks at least a bit less embarrassingly amateurish than it did before. but i'm not a designer, so i'm pretty sure, there's still a lot of stuff that can be done about it.
so if you have any suggestions, regarding layout, typography or whatever other aspect of the site, please speak up. btw.: i'm using some CSS3 features which are not yet supported by all browsers (as i had to learn in the past weeks, MS's internet explorer is especially reluctant in supporting web standards). |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Mar 2004 Member: #15959 Location: Berlin, Germany | ||
|
|||
Hi, Robin
It looks better indeed. I personnally have a strong aversion for gradients (but it really is a matter of personal taste, so it is only my 0.2$ opinion), so i must say i don't really like the top and left borders with purple>white gradient, and the other thing i don't like a lot is the choice of black color for the header on the gradient background. ALso, i am not a great fan of the default blue font for the links ("freebies", "products"), turning purple once clicked. May i suggest to make the website look a little bit more like your plugins (with less gradient, using the same font for the titles, and a more minimalistic white/blue shades background) ? Easy-Q and EngineersFIlter has nice GUIs I like the screenshot of the products on the frontpage, it is a nice addition. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Member: #22903 Location: france | ||
|
|||
sinkmusic wrote: Hi, Robin
It looks better indeed. I personnally have a strong aversion for gradients (but it really is a matter of personal taste, so it is only my 0.2$ opinion), so i must say i don't really like the top and left borders with purple>white gradient thanks for your feedback. hmm..OK. i actually like gradients generally, but perhaps it's a little bit too obtrusive. i might try to not go to fully white but perhaps some shade of gray. or do you think, i should better use completely solid color? i may try some versions... Quote: and the other thing i don't like a lot is the choice of black color for the header on the gradient background.
i was not sure about the headline either - what color would you suggest? Quote: ALso, i am not a great fan of the default blue font for the links ("freebies", "products"), turning purple once clicked.
on the one hand, i agree, on the other, i think blue and purple fit very well into the overall colorscheme. perhaps i should try somewhat darker shades of both - drag them more towards black? i think, in particular the blue is perhaps a bit overly saturated. or what do you think? a completely different color altogether? Quote: May i suggest to make the website look a little bit more like your plugins (with less gradient, using the same font for the titles, and a more minimalistic white/blue shades background) ? Easy-Q and EngineersFIlter has nice GUIs yeah, i'd like to do this, but the font on my guis is a selfmade, hardcoded pixelfont, so it's currently not practical to use it on the website. and to be honest, i consider to change the GUI font back into something more common (like arial or whatever) anyway. the main reason why i created is pixel-font was the blurry (anti-aliased) rendering of standard fonts in JUCE. but as we move towards high resolution displays, this will sooner or later become a non-issue anyway. but actually, the GUIs do have pretty strong gradients as well, don't you think so? Quote: I like the screenshot of the products on the frontpage, it is a nice addition.
yes - how could i dare to welcome the visitor with loads and loads of text before. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Mar 2004 Member: #15959 Location: Berlin, Germany |
| KVR Forum Index » rs-met | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group


















