Quick...slam top back on can of worms...

You can't ask that question here. Oh, wait, you have two questions. You're really pushing it.

People come to KVR for answers - they can get questions at home.

Questions<------>Answers
Questions<------>More questions

You know... I used to love coming on this forum. In the heydays oh the Runagate, vurt, Jazzyspoon, justin3am, etc. Now everyone is on the rag. I cant stand this place anymore. which is why i hardly ever post anymore. (you can see what happens when I do)

Well, the search function in the plug in database still allows you to check and single out the way it was coded. So I'd say it is a good question that still holds relevance. I'm not sure why everybody is jumping on pattonfreak like he has no right to inquire about this. I wouldn't mind knowing either. Actually I usually look at that before buying, if just for curiosity's sake.

Yeaj I know the database carries that info but these aren't in it yet.
Either way it was a simple question requiring a simple answer. But it just had to be drug out into... Eh f**k it, I'm done. Back on topic:
Nice fx xoxos.
I REALLY like the layout of the EQ. I'd say its near perfect.

hmm,i'm about to download the demo.
do the files prodiuce a folder full of sems/seps?.
if so,then it's se.
i'm pretty sure rurik still uses se,with his custom se modules too.

just a quick test,before the kids start jumping on my head. again

multiq and phazer are my fave guis,
got great sounds out of the mod delay,reverb was nice,static delay stopped working,maybe when i loaded the other version/gui? i think one gui would be enough.
nice collection ,i think stick to one gui and maybe add a few more staples,like a chorus.
and you could be on to a winner.

i should have clarified in the distribution.. each vst uses a unique identifier, so when two vst have the same identifier it's up to the host how it's handled.

just install the one with the gui that works for you


these vst were made with SynthEdit

yes, i think it's often more of a stigma than it needs to be (digital data is not "eroded" by using one sdk or another) and yes, some hosts do have marked issues with some formats.

the sitar i'm working on is also synthedit.. i should be c++ and steinberg vst sdk after that

pattonfreak1 - thx - the eq is a bit cpu heavy, i think small eq and tinyeq are more efficient, and rs-met's freebie is a compact, easy to use choice. (eg. mine has no dB readout! gain goes +/- 50dB..)

Were these made in Wolfenstein 3d? Still a good game, damn good.

I've been playing with the reverb/pitch shifter, seems a different approach. I think a master volume would be handy, there's 2 now-wet and dry.

It sounds good, in a new way, generally any reverb that comes out and people think is good is essentially the exact same as the previous one. Filters in that are a plus, I prefer a treble booster emulation before any reverb(per track, on a mix that would be reckless).

do me a favour and keep using it. in certain venues of kvr you will see a stalwart core of users who continually generate content and involve themselves with all new activity. no alternate user paradigm can establish itself and one by one users who don't share their views are discouraged not to take part, so that the predominant expression of opinion (which is oh so important) becomes theirs.

and you thought this was just about music technology.

nice work Rurik

these sound terrific

unify da gui.

several gui's were hard to read when I tested for xoxos, I also found tha tat least on the versions he sent me some fx had a threshold issue where trying to get a subtle effect was difficult. On the eq I found that when I treid to push it a little I got a ringing that was pretty bad.

I liked the modulation filter the best, I really did not care for the reverb sounds at all (but that is purely subjective). The modulation delay is very similar in nature to ECOX from Samplitudes suite, the modulation delay from xoxos was easir to understand and more straight forward but when I set the ECOX similar and A/B'd them the modulation filter sounded weak and plastic.

I found some of the fx when push came to shove the effect part (like the sweep in the flange or phase) seemed to over power the note generating it almost as if they were just tone generators and not even needing the original signal.

Others may or may not find this, I use fx in a very subtle way and I dont want to hear them. These fx have a great range if you want to really hear the fx and of course this gives them many possibilities but I did find the ringing in the eq to also occur in other fx.

This could have been on my part, on my DAW and have not been the fx at all. Unfortunatley when I sent this info to xoxos and led off saying if he could make suggestions on why instead of showing any grattitude for my report he was very dismissive and frankly quite offensive in his short reply which shocked me coming from what I consider a friend.

Moral of the story, never beta test for people you think are friends. I am somewhat interested if others have noticed these things but not to the point of actually caring because I have the best in sascha's fx suite in samplitude but I have been doing a slow burn all weekend over my "friends" response to this

http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=300257

really?