Products @ KVR
Blue Cat's ChorusBlue Cat's Digital Peak MeterBlue Cat's Digital Peak Meter ProBlue Cat's DynamicsBlue Cat's FlangerBlue Cat's FreqAnalystBlue Cat's FreqAnalyst MultiBlue Cat's FreqAnalyst ProBlue Cat's Gain SuiteBlue Cat's Liny EQ SeriesBlue Cat's MB-5 DynamixBlue Cat's MB-7 MixerBlue Cat's Oscilloscope MultiBlue Cat's Parametr'EQ seriesBlue Cat's PhaserBlue Cat's ProtectorBlue Cat's Remote ControlBlue Cat's Stereo Triple EQBlue Cat's StereoScope SeriesBlue Cat's Triple EQBlue Cat's Widening Meter ProBlue Cat's Widening Triple EQ
|
|||
Bonjour!
[Digital Peak Meter Pro v3.4] Now: Normal RMS+0 K-20 RMS+23 K-14 RMS+17 K-12 RMS+15 K-10 RMS+13 Bob Katz's K-System http://www.digido.com/level-practices-part-2-includes-the-k- system.html I think Bob Katz's K-System is the baseline of RMS, not peak. Therefore, Normal RMS+0 K-20 RMS+20 K-14 RMS+14 K-12 RMS+12 K-10 RMS+10 I think this is correct. What do you think of this? Merci, au revoir! 
--- DAW:Cubase 5.5.2 OS:Windows Vista 32bit SP2 --- |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Dec 2009 Member: #221959 Location: Japan | ||
|
|||
Hi,
well, in fact the +3dB on the RMS value is just a way of normalizing it (so that a sinusoid has the same RMS and peak value). And as far as I remember, that's what the K-system specifies, so it should be all good . |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Sep 2004 Member: #39981 Location: Paris (France) | ||
|
|||
Now I understand.
Thank you for your answer.  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Dec 2009 Member: #221959 Location: Japan |
| KVR Forum Index » Blue Cat Audio | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
