|
|||
Hi,
I wondering why there is so little love for MeldaProduction MReverb and MMultiBandReverb. When I demoed them I found them to be very, very good sounding and they are quite affordable. I tested them against my old to-go reberbs the spinaudio Roomverb M1 and M2 (which I learnt to master in the past) and found that it competes quite well. I could live happy with the Roomverbs, but they are not available in 64 bit (and never will since SpinAudio is shut down) and I will probably soon switch to 64 bit only. I know, many will now recommend Valhalla Room. But I tested them side by side and found the following: while Valhalla is more of instant gratification, MReverb/MMultiBandReverb can surpass the sound of Valhalla when twaeking the preset sounds (which are maybe not the best). What is more, MReverb/MMultiBandReverb offer a lot more features and thus possibilities for twaeking (in this regard it resembles the SpinAudio Roomverb). A great highlight is imo the spatial positioning system which allows for simulation movement in a room. So is it just that it is less known, or why else is this product ignored in reverb discussion? Have you tested it? What are your objections? cheers, akj |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Member: #14851 | ||
|
|||
I personally find that MReverb sounds much less natural compared to EAReverb, Valhalla Room or CSR. It's more difficult to dial in a smooth reverb tail in MReverb than in the other three. Also, it isn't as flexible soundwise. The reverb modes don't differ by much and the available parameters are fairly basic. That doesn't mean the MReverb can't sit perfectly in the mix in a specific situation. It also has some unique features as you mentioned, for example when it comes to modulation. I'm in the lucky situation to have all four reverbs mentioned here, so I can pick whatever fits my needs best.
So in the end the reason why MReverb is "ignored" is probably that it just isn't that special compared to what else is available. With plugins like EpicVerb or Ambience being available for free I don't deem MReverb a must-have. IMO Vojtech has some much better plugins in his portfolio. And believe me, the upcoming MXXX will be awesome! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Oct 2008 Member: #191485 Location: Germany | ||
|
|||
I would really be interested in having a fair comparison as I found the MReverb sounding exceptionally good (to my ears only, of course). I will be posting a dry vocal example. So if you got time, would you be willing to post some wet examples that really show how Valhalla (which I really wanted to like) and the others mentioned are superior?
cheers, akj ps: really waiting to see what MXXX is like |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Member: #14851 | ||
|
|||
so here is a dry vocal example:
http://www.power-xs.net/download/vox_dry.mp3 cheers, akj ps: please, use the vocal line only for the reverb test and not in your projects. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Member: #14851 | ||
|
|||
AKJ wrote: Have you tested it? What are your objections?
cheers, akj I haven't tested it and have no intention to, because Melda is a developer which in a short time, has been making many basic effects that don't sound better than others, and often sound worse, like the ones I have tested: limiter, compressors/"dynamics", "maximizer", chorus, phaser. I can just assume the reverb is yet another one of them, most probably basic code he cleaned up a little and maybe added small features to, unlike serious reverb developers who have spent many months and sometimes years on their reverb effects. I also can't get the MDrummer forum incident out of my mind. ---- "Music is spiritual. The music business is not." - Claudio Monteverdi |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Member: #30980 | ||
|
|||
AKJ wrote: so here is a dry vocal example:
http://www.power-xs.net/download/vox_dry.mp3 cheers, akj ps: please, use the vocal line only for the reverb test and not in your projects. What kind of reverb do you want? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Oct 2008 Member: #191485 Location: Germany | ||
|
|||
Shy wrote: AKJ wrote: Have you tested it? What are your objections?
cheers, akj I haven't tested it and have no intention to, because Melda is a developer which in a short time, has been making many basic effects that don't sound better than others, and often sound worse, like the ones I have tested: limiter, compressors/"dynamics", "maximizer", chorus, phaser. I can just assume the reverb is yet another one of them, most probably basic code he cleaned up a little and maybe added small features to, unlike serious reverb developers who have spent many months and sometimes years on their reverb effects. I also can't get the MDrummer forum incident out of my mind. altough I tend to agree that there are better EQs and Compressors out there, some of the plugins are quite good. In the free pack this applies especially for autopan, vibrato, tremolo and the analyzer. The harmonizer, the delay and both the convo and the algorithmic reverb are imo very good, too. That's why I got their creative bundle recently (it's on discount). I am going to post a wet example of the reverb, so that one can get an impression. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Member: #14851 | ||
|
|||
here is the announced wet example:
http://www.power-xs.net/download/vox_wet_mmultibandreverb_si ngleband.mp3 (is was done using MMultiBandreverb but with only one active band since I believe that multiband is not at all needed nor desireable in a reverb. I just got the multiband version as it was part of the creative bundle together with some other plugs I was interested in.) |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Member: #14851 | ||
|
|||
paterpeter wrote: What kind of reverb do you want? well, I like natural sounding rooms and halls but post anything that show how the products mentioned are superior if you like. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Member: #14851 | ||
|
|||
I don't consider myself eligible for a serious reverb shootout, but here is your sample and a drumpattern with (not in this order) CSR Hall, EAReverb, MReverb and VRoom (both the vocal and the drums using the same settings). I won't tell the order for now, just to let you listen without prejudice.
http://soundcloud.com/petergonesonic/reverbs (the wav version is downloadable) While I tried to use settings that are similar, it doesn't mean those couldn't be tweaked to sound better/more similar. It's just to give a rough comparison. I have no intention to prove anything with this example, though. Some prefer one reverb, some prefer another. *Personally*, I like MReverb the least on this example. But this could be a matter of settings, of course. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Oct 2008 Member: #191485 Location: Germany | ||
|
|||
thanks, blind testing is very good.
first impression: really not a lot of difference between the examples. regarding the voice: examples 1 and 4 have a small edge, example 2 is a little less convincing, but it also seemed to have less late reflections (so mixing in a little more could "cure" it). regarding the drums: the first sounds best to me (somehow the snare wins in character). the other three are very similar, but again, they are not really worlds apart from example 1. it would be interesting to know which is which. but don't reveal it too early, let's hear some more opinions. cheers and thanks, akj Last edited by AKJ on Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:46 am; edited 2 times in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Member: #14851 | ||
|
|||
I really wish melda makes some synth with tons of features. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Member: #148905 | ||
|
|||
Ok i LOVE Melda, i praise Vojtech all the time, and he knows i consider him to be a brilliant dev and guy with the multitude of constaint positive energy i direct at his products..
SO please forgive me when i say, with a heavy heart, the reverb is awful, I have tried it multiple times on many many sources, and it is grainy and metallic in the most undesirable way possible, that reminds me of reverbs never remembered. THAT'S why it's not talked about, cause it's his weakest product. That said i heavily disagree with shy about the other products, i think Vojtech gets things done so fast because he IS a one man band who literally works around the clock, and i find his modulation effects average, true (the flanger is acceptable but i am not a fan of the phaser), but almost everything else is absolutely top notch. Everything else. Ancd the fact everything is multiband. The auto EQ by the way is the BEST matching eq on the PLANET for ease of use and quality.. and i am so blessed Vojtech allowed me to keep that single license when i was struggling and needed to sell my total bundle. When i have the money again, i will buy the total bundle without hesitation. i love to support people like this who care and listen!! I don't know about the m drummer "forum debacle" though? Enlighten me? ---- Please call me Theo. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Sep 2001 Member: #1049 Location: Melbourne Australia | ||
|
|||
for the vocal demos - my headphones here at work (on my half hour lunch break) liked samples 1 & 4.
paterpeter wrote: I don't consider myself eligible for a serious reverb shootout, but here is your sample and a drumpattern with (not in this order) CSR Hall, EAReverb, MReverb and VRoom (both the vocal and the drums using the same settings). I won't tell the order for now, just to let you listen without prejudice.
http://soundcloud.com/petergonesonic/reverbs (the wav version is downloadable) While I tried to use settings that are similar, it doesn't mean those couldn't be tweaked to sound better/more similar. It's just to give a rough comparison. I have no intention to prove anything with this example, though. Some prefer one reverb, some prefer another. *Personally*, I like MReverb the least on this example. But this could be a matter of settings, of course. ---- Thanks & God Bless, Bro. Charles Reviewer's Revival Blogsite "Supporting and promoting independent audio software developers." |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Jan 2012 Member: #271995 Location: Alberta, Canada | ||
|
|||
ttoz wrote: SO please forgive me when i say, with a heavy heart, the reverb is awful, I have tried it multiple times on many many sources, and it is grainy and metallic in the most undesirable way possible, that reminds me of reverbs never remembered. so can you tell which is the melda reverb in the examples? reverbs seems to be very subjective. this German magazine tested it and rated it quite high (high grade plugin with very good test result and outstanding value for money): http://www.professional-audio.de/bestenliste.html (go to Hall-Plug-ins) Last edited by AKJ on Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Member: #14851 |
| KVR Forum Index » Effects | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group






