And similarly it merely takes some random twerp to claim something and not back it up with anything concrete...

So tell me this Einstein, when will Aether 2.0 be released?

I think it is OK to say someone doesn't agree with the pricing scheme. That is fine and I am sure it is considered by the developer, however it's going a little far IMO to make assumptions that the company is attempting to rip off its customer base WITHOUT knowing all of the details behind why the product was given the price tag it has and ACTUALLY what extent of man-hours in R&D went into developing the product in question. Sure we can look at the shell and say "Wow this sure looks like a wide-screen Breeze ho ho ho" but I HIGHLY doubt that that is all there is to B2. Actually, I can see that it is not the case because I used my valuable time to demo it beforehand. It is quite different than what the other two have to offer.

Now, that said, the discount for existing customers is a cool 100USD ttl of the MSRP.

Lol, u're funny. Carrot top funny.

Sure. But first, lets see the proof that there ever was, and in fact always was, going to be an Aether 2.0 in the first place.

Because obviously if there wasnt, B2 cant be it. And if there was, and I give you a timescale, presumably that'll be sufficient proof that B2 isnt it?

So either way you shut up, yeah?

April 2013. At 9.23pm precisely GMT time. Unless it rains, in which case it might be the following Tuesday.

Shut up? I don't answer to you.
What are you judge & jury for this forum?

By the way, from several years ago:


Last edited by Lenticular on Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:19 am; edited 1 time in total

Haven't read the all the posts on this dread but saw the update elsewhere and checked out their website.

As an existing customer very dissapointing, thought 2C where more innovated than this?

On a plus if your dont have Aether I am guessing this is the one to go for, haven't researched properly as I've enough reverb to echo the universe (2C, Lexicon, Valhalla, Waves, Tsar).

Switched off when saw it's another reverb sigh and no deals for existing owners (got both Aether and Breeze).

Anti climax anything more in the pipeline 2c?

I dunno, if 2C audio love reverb then thats cool, let them make as many as they want. If you have Aether or Breeze though I can see the dilemma. If I did no have Aether I'd probably be up for it.

So you're saying that either way you dont shut up? That hardly makes it worth me answering.

What's the point in asking, or answering a question, if the information changes nothing?

Im confused as to the rest of it. Did you not understand the fairly simple question?



Yeah, but I asked for proof of 'always,' didnt I.

You really are an Einstein....Read it!

yes there is. might be wirth checking your email.

Well, Im pretty sure Einstein understood logic, whereas you, very clearly, dont. So, you read it, apply some, and then get back to us all when it seeps through.

Clue : saying 'we intend to do X' several does not actually preclude abandoning the intention to do X.

Why don't you get a clue & realize this was written well over 2 years ago. Maybe you will try to understand instead of trying to appear knowledgeable.

I also have the "The Perfect Storm" Aether + Breeze + expansions..

B2 looks nice, and sounds nice and all but, I look at the upgrade pricing scheme and if you only own one of 2C products than you get $50 off...

I think those of us who have everything so far should get another $50 off, it seems fair to me, the more 2C products you have the bigger the discount.

As one owning Aether and breeze and some UAD reverbs among others, even at $150 it's tough to swallow and justify B2

A clue about what? The longer ago it was written, the more that supports what I said...

Clue : saying 'we intend to do X' two years ago still does not actually preclude abandoning the intention to do X.



Says the guy who still can't understand that saying "we're going to do X" two years ago doesnt actually prove that doing Q has anything to do with X, or that it proves anything about whether X ever will be done.

Im knowledgeable enough to know you're saying nothing of any merit here.

So lets recap: you're supposedly trying to prove that B2 is Aether 2.0. You decided to defend that assertion on the basis that anyone who doesnt know the future intended date for the release of Aether 2.0 cant say this isnt Aether 2.0, despite the inherent lack of logic in that, on the basis that once upon a time, Aether 2.0 was mooted.

Clue 2 : saying 'we intend to do X' two years ago does not actually prove that Q is X.
Last edited by whyterabbyt on Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:06 am; edited 1 time in total