|
|||
Marginal Ray wrote: Quote: This is bullshit too  Very intelligent and expressive point of view ! I just wanted to point out that when an artist realeases his work (and a synth like Alchemy is a kind of art work), its the public (here the users) who decides how good the work is. It' the same for your music: if you are the only one who consider yourself as a genius, there must be a problem! Raymond Hmmm I have to agree with this. Sure, an artist's painting is still 'his' masterpiece and he'll stay the autor, but it's the people who decide if it's nice or not, not him. That what you meant right? ---- __________________________________________________ http://soundcloud.com/red-fog http://soundcloud.com/sleeping-on-lotus-ashes http://landofthedrones.blogspot.ca/ __________________________________________________ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Sep 2010 Member: #239633 | ||
|
|||
Quote: Hmmm I have to agree with this. Sure, an artist's painting is still 'his' masterpiece and he'll stay the autor, but it's the people who decide if it's nice or not, not him. That what you meant right? Yes ! Sorry for my bad english. I may be misunderstood because of this. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Member: #250933 Location: Paris (France) | ||
|
|||
Quote: Somebody hasn't read the ULA. 
I'm sorry. I dont know what is ULA. In France, it was the name of a famous prostitute of the 80's or 90's, who organised strikes the protest against the social situation of those "sex workers". Raymond |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Member: #250933 Location: Paris (France) | ||
|
|||
User License Agreement?
- Mario |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Member: #54405 | ||
|
|||
Yes ULA was shorthand for EULA (End User License Agreement), apparently due to a mis-understanding about the concept of the public "owning" Alchemy after it was released (which certainly makes sense in the "work of art" context).
Peace, Andy. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Member: #183136 Location: Melbourne, Australia | ||
|
|||
ZenPunkHippy wrote: Yes ULA was shorthand for EULA (End User License Agreement), apparently due to a mis-understanding about the concept of the public "owning" Alchemy after it was released (which certainly makes sense in the "work of art" context).
Peace, Andy. Ok Andy, I saw it from the artistic, not the legal point of view. Cheers. Raymond |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Member: #250933 Location: Paris (France) | ||
|
|||
olepro wrote: I allready did in another thread but you just wouldn't accept the way i did my comparison. I think it's on time you show me that Alchemy resynthesis sound better or equal to Harmor with your acclaimed right settings ! yes and it was pretty clear why the comparison wasn't valid. I'm not going to do any comparison example, however if you say there is a difference I would like to hear it. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Dec 2003 Member: #11035 Location: Edinburgh | ||
|
|||
Sampleconstruct wrote: Oh please, not another Harmor versus Alchemy thread, we've been through that already...
agreed! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Dec 2003 Member: #11035 Location: Edinburgh | ||
|
|||
Marginal Ray wrote: Quote: This is bullshit too Very intelligent and expressive point of view ! I just wanted to point out that when an artist realeases his work (and a synth like Alchemy is a kind of art work), its the public (here the users) who decides how good the work is. Well maybe don't forget that maybe your opinion isn't necessarily the same as the majority of everyone else's. We have a saying in English which might not translate, opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one . |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Dec 2003 Member: #11035 Location: Edinburgh | ||
|
|||
I have a feeling this thread is derailing...... ---- __________________________________________________ http://soundcloud.com/red-fog http://soundcloud.com/sleeping-on-lotus-ashes http://landofthedrones.blogspot.ca/ __________________________________________________ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Sep 2010 Member: #239633 | ||
|
|||
There seems to be a lot of that on KVR this last week or two. Strange.
Anyway, it would be excellent if everyone kept things civil, thanks. Peace, Andy. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Member: #183136 Location: Melbourne, Australia | ||
|
|||
ZenPunkHippy wrote: There seems to be a lot of that on KVR this last week or two. Strange.
Anyway, it would be excellent if everyone kept things civil, thanks. Peace, Andy. Especially since it's an interesting thread, with good stuff to read from different Alchemy users. And a debate that can only be good for Alchemy itself I think!  ---- __________________________________________________ http://soundcloud.com/red-fog http://soundcloud.com/sleeping-on-lotus-ashes http://landofthedrones.blogspot.ca/ __________________________________________________ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Sep 2010 Member: #239633 | ||
|
|||
Neon Breath wrote: ZenPunkHippy wrote: There seems to be a lot of that on KVR this last week or two. Strange.
Anyway, it would be excellent if everyone kept things civil, thanks. Peace, Andy. Especially since it's an interesting thread, with good stuff to read from different Alchemy users. And a debate that can only be good for Alchemy itself I think! So, peace and debate ! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Member: #250933 Location: Paris (France) | ||
|
|||
For the record, I own Alchemy, Omnisphere, and Harmor. They're all completely different instruments (really!) and there's very little, if any, basis for comparison. Best to focus on individual strengths and leave it at that. All of them could be perceived to be lacking in some area, but that's only natural. ---- "I don't need a signature, do I?" |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Member: #63116 Location: Seattle | ||
|
|||
Neon Breath wrote: Marginal Ray wrote: Quote: This is bullshit too Very intelligent and expressive point of view ! I just wanted to point out that when an artist realeases his work (and a synth like Alchemy is a kind of art work), its the public (here the users) who decides how good the work is. It' the same for your music: if you are the only one who consider yourself as a genius, there must be a problem! Raymond Hmmm I have to agree with this. Sure, an artist's painting is still 'his' masterpiece and he'll stay the autor, but it's the people who decide if it's nice or not, not him. That what you meant right? Well, sure, but then, as history shows us, hindsight is often 20/20 in these situations... countless famous artists ("masters") were virtually ignored while alive, even if *they* thought (knew) they were geniuses. Only long after their deaths were they made famous... Never underestimate the fickleness and ability to exercise poor judgment of large groups of people, I says... 
Luckily, this is not always the case, and it's much easier with functional code to determine whether or not it's actually useful for what we do! ---- "I don't need a signature, do I?" |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Member: #63116 Location: Seattle |
| KVR Forum Index » Camel Audio | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
