|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Mar 2011 Member: #252737 | ||
|
|||
Another initial observation on the tracks submitted this month.
My first listen through was on headphones. I then listened to the same tracks on my car stereo while driving to/from work. The difference in my views of some of the tracks was substantial, depending on the listening environment. Some of the better (IMHO) tracks while listening on headphones became seriously uninteresting on the car stereo - I think because the subtler details got lost in the background noise. Given the nature of this month's theme, I think those subtleties are important in creating a hypnotic ambience - so this month my comments (and voting) will be based on the impressions while listening on headphones. Has anyone else noticed such large differences while listening to this month's tracks in different environments/on different equipment? How do you take account of these differences when deciding your votes? ---- Time is an illusion - lunchtime doubly so. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Apr 2004 Member: #20182 Location: Magrathea, The Universe | ||
|
|||
slartibartfast wrote: Another initial observation on the tracks submitted this month.
My first listen through was on headphones. I then listened to the same tracks on my car stereo while driving to/from work. The difference in my views of some of the tracks was substantial, depending on the listening environment. Some of the better (IMHO) tracks while listening on headphones became seriously uninteresting on the car stereo - I think because the subtler details got lost in the background noise. Given the nature of this month's theme, I think those subtleties are important in creating a hypnotic ambience - so this month my comments (and voting) will be based on the impressions while listening on headphones. Has anyone else noticed such large differences while listening to this month's tracks in different environments/on different equipment? How do you take account of these differences when deciding your votes? I only use headphones for listening to KVR tracks. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Member: #36587 Location: Colorado Springs | ||
|
|||
yevster wrote: May the odds be ever in your favor (sorry, couldn't resist).
Someone went to the movies this weekend... BTW, thanks for the top vote |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Sep 2010 Member: #238812 | ||
|
|||
Haha, yeah, I did. And you totally deserve it. Your piece was wicked catchy. And I'm a sucker for catchy things. And I love your textural development. Gonna listen to some more of your stuff... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Member: #194258 Location: Greater Boston | ||
|
|||
rockstar_not wrote: slartibartfast wrote: Has anyone else noticed such large differences while listening to this month's tracks in different environments/on different equipment? How do you take account of these differences when deciding your votes? I only use headphones for listening to KVR tracks.1) Nasty Sony PC 12" LCD monitor speakers 2) Far less nasty ViewSonic PC 24" w/s monitor speakers 3) Pretty nice Technics RP-F350 headphones In any month, I'll use one of these for all entrants... picking which is a little hit and miss but once I've started, that's the treatment all get. I don't compare a track across environments but I recognise that some tracks work better in the lower fidelity environments than others - i.e. they're more "radio friendly" in that sense. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Member: #5825 Location: London, UK | ||
|
|||
Thanks for sharing your listening environments, pljones, rockstar_not. Having participated (and voted) in many of these contests in the past, this is the first time that I have noticed that the difference between listening on headphones or on speakers is so huge. I can only put this down to the nature of this month's theme, and the more ambient nature of many of the tracks. Interesting. ---- Time is an illusion - lunchtime doubly so. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Apr 2004 Member: #20182 Location: Magrathea, The Universe | ||
|
|||
GMoneh wrote: D.H. Miltz wrote: Next month's theme: Get to the point, already. Make something musically complete and meaningful (to you and, possibly, to voters) that lasts no longer than thirty seconds. Or as farlukar might put it: a thinly disguised free-for-all with a thirty second time limit. Wow, that's really short for a month... Can we make two submissions? I think I'll keep it at one submission. Although, just like any other month, you could do one by yourself and one collaboration (or none by yourself and two collabs). |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Member: #183273 | ||
|
|||
rachMiel, thanks for the vote!
if anyone else liked 'prayer wheel 12', here are some early versions: http://archive.org/details/PrayerWheels edit: oops, prayer wheel 12 attempted some '5/8 riffage', where it turns out the older versions were using much more '6/8'. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Jul 2009 Member: #211816 | ||
|
|||
Sorry for the short comments this month: I'm rather distracted by uni work. No offence intended: this is capturing my immediate reactions mostly for the purposes of voting.
First, the top ten (as it was at the time - the order will have changed by now) forw - Yes. This. Does it. Oh yes. Challenge to stay awake here - that's good! Patrick9 - Worked. Very nice. Emerald Tablet - Like that, yes... kryptonaut - Ahhh... Tick that tock. I can get into this. inboxzero - Kept waking me up with the odd rhytmic jumps but otherwise pretty hypnotic. knockman - Mmm, very mesmerising. Nice tune, too. liqih - Ah, I can see this one's goal but it's n.... ot going to work (that middle bit does better). offthewall - This simply has to score some points. Nicely done as ever! D.H. Miltz - Mmmmm.... relaxing nikp2000 - Well, it's trying to hypnotise someone. It needs to try hard but it's got the idea right. And the rest as they came (of course, if I listened to them all again, some of these could be promoted into the upper division)... Interferon - Crackly. "Couch" as in padded? Pad? Geddit? Mister Natural - Felt a little grey and dull rather than dali-esq... Bjulin - Um, no. Took me nowhere. Doc Jon - More ticking and "rain"? I like the piano. The rain sounded very fake in the end. Lovely track, though. Jerru - Mmm, started off a little weak but improved in the middle. Less keen on the ending - too busy. mrblitz - FFS?! W'uh? Seriously? farlukar - Became irritating after a good start. yevster - Nice tune. I can see the idea but it didn't quite get under my skin. Good length. bzur - I wasn't. Nice snap at the end, though. At least, I don't think I was. Was I? beanpole - Distracting and irritating rather than hypnotic... Laguna Rising - Bouncy castles in the fog. Or something. Becoming French. Weird... rachmiel - Throbbing. But somewhat unfulfilling. evo2slo - Nice song but... um, the theme? Vulcandj - Eastern and mystical yet not hypnotic. oddbod - Eastern and mystical yet not hypnotic. (Uh... take two!) rockstar_not - Hm. No connection, sorry. slartibartfast - Needs hypnotoic visuals, I think. Peterhud - Pleasant enough. GMoneh - Nice tune but... not doing hypnotic for me. satYatunes - More rain - sounds more realistic, too. But very wide awake. (edit: 10 is an even number.) Last edited by pljones on Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:14 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Member: #5825 Location: London, UK | ||
|
|||
yevster, thanks for the vote ! mrblitz wrote: (HM: almost voted laguna's piece #1, but it 'wasn't hypnotic'. the progression to that is so cool.)
forw wrote: laguna rising - great crazy melody!
pljones wrote: Laguna Rising - Bouncy castles in the fog. Or something. Becoming French. Weird...
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Apr 2005 Member: #63988 Location: Unsettled | ||
|
|||
pljones wrote: Sorry for the short comments this month: I'm rather distracted by uni work.
Short comments is better than no comments. Any comments at all are appreciated. pljones wrote: GMoneh - Nice tune but... not doing hypnotic for me.
That's cool. Thanks for the listen anyway. Ummm.... you do know that the top 10 should have only 10 entries, right? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Sep 2010 Member: #238812 | ||
|
|||
GMoneh wrote: Ummm.... you do know that the top 10 should have only 10 entries, right? See, that's what I get for going over them so many times..!! Gah! Sorry yevster.
D.H. Miltz, can you just ignore yevster or should I edit my vote entry? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Member: #5825 Location: London, UK | ||
|
|||
pljones wrote: forw - Yes. This. Does it. Oh yes. Challenge to stay awake here - that's good! @pljones: Thanks alot for listening and your kind words!! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Member: #56363 Location: berlin | ||
|
|||
pljones wrote: rockstar_not - Hm. No connection, sorry. ) Does this mean you couldnt listen to the track or it didn't fit the theme in your opinion? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Member: #36587 Location: Colorado Springs |
| KVR Forum Index » Music Cafe | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group








