|
|||
Brian @ IK Multimedia wrote: As I stated, you do this with AmpliTube's built-in Preset Browser. When you launch AmpliTube 3, at the top you will see two fields, one that says "000A" and one that says "Default." You can browse the different preset menus by clicking on the field that says "Default." You will find menus for different amps or "Complete Rigs" organized by AmpliTube software title and such. Select any of these presets as a starting place. Then you can browse sequentially through the preset menu with the up/down arrows to the RIGHT of this field (next to BPM.)
haha...I just learned something. I never knew it would do that. I always just opened it and built whatever "rig" I wanted to use. How much easier could preset browsing get? For me, at least, the answer is, to paraphrase Nigel Tufnel, none...none more easy. Thanks, Brian, for the simple and easy to follow explanation. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Aug 2009 Member: #212782 | ||
|
|||
I do hope that this update was something directly derived from listening to customers, and yet it took a while but it is here and kicks butt IMO.
It is very difficult to find what exactly to implement amongst many suggestions but rest assured we do listen to customers, even the ones that call us and much of what we've chosen do stupid. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2009 Member: #217907 | ||
|
|||
kbaccki wrote: Why, even the oft-referenced, track-impaired Beatles would have had a need for at least 3 simultaneous AT instances back in the 60's.
you talkin to me? I'm afraid when it comes to bass I'm very old school and fairly boring, I like it clean and Samplitude has plenty of tools to handle the job ---- I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012 RIP Reason L. and Ian B |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Member: #8838 Location: New England U.S.A. | ||
|
|||
Peter - IK Multimedia wrote: I do hope that this update was something directly derived from listening to customers, and yet it took a while but it is here and kicks butt IMO.
no, it's because I just went out and got a beast for a new DAW JUST so I could run AT better and then you change it to lower cpu usage...you're working with pc audiolabs to sell machines...I know because my machine came loaded with AT3 (to be fair GR4 too but as you know I already have both)...so yeah, I know what your little game is ---- I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012 RIP Reason L. and Ian B |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Member: #8838 Location: New England U.S.A. | ||
|
|||
Yes we do like PC Audiolabs and they like us. We're also happy that Orange likes us enough to have us do the official models AND have AmpliTube the amp sim on their OPC recording computer. I didn't break this out when we were taking latency, but this speed record was broken (again) using AmpliTube on the OPC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG4GDIqSf14 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2009 Member: #217907 | ||
|
|||
Did anybody bother to slow it down to make sure all the notes are there?
BTW, I actually have a new tune that's in need of a 2 second guitar solo. If you have this cat's digits, please PM! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Sep 2004 Member: #40510 | ||
|
|||
This is so mediocre |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Oct 2009 Member: #216688 | ||
|
|||
Hink wrote: But in all honesty I tend to have the leading tone be a real tube amp into an iso
No s. ---- Zerocrossing Media http://www.zerocrossing.net 4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Member: #111565 Location: San Francisco Bay Area | ||
|
|||
Peter - IK Multimedia wrote: Yes we do like PC Audiolabs and they like us. We're also happy that Orange likes us enough to have us do the official models AND have AmpliTube the amp sim on their OPC recording computer. I didn't break this out when we were taking latency, but this speed record was broken (again) using AmpliTube on the OPC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG4GDIqSf14
you know I was joking about improving cpu usage now right? But yeah the PC Audiolab 10 year anniversary bundle had IK stuff and NI stuff (Cakewalk and vieklang too), I really did not expect to re-install GR4 but it authorized when I authorized B4II. I figure between Ampitube and Samplitude I have the in the box solutions covered quite nicely. TBH I have not tried playing direct into AT yet and have not downloaded the update yet but that's only because of the problems I had with Yellow Tools consuming my time. I did have one song that had AT set up like I described but had not authorize AT yet and the white noise bursts caught me off guard...too many things to think about when you get a new machine and update your host and my mind is too quick to think "I knew something else would go wrong" ---- I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012 RIP Reason L. and Ian B |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Member: #8838 Location: New England U.S.A. | ||
|
|||
zerocrossing wrote: Hink wrote: But in all honesty I tend to have the leading tone be a real tube amp into an iso
No s. and I'm not done yet ---- I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012 RIP Reason L. and Ian B |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Member: #8838 Location: New England U.S.A. | ||
|
|||
Ah come on, whether you like it or not it pretty much blows the latency thing out of the argument... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2009 Member: #217907 | ||
|
|||
bishop666 wrote: This is so medioCORE
fixed |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
Peter - IK Multimedia wrote: Ah come on, whether you like it or not it pretty much blows the latency thing out of the argument...
tbh I didn't even watch the video until just now (interesting to say the least), I can only tell you if latency is there for me or not. Like I have said in the past you can't actually hear the latency that concerns me and tbh it's rare I use this method. If I'm layering tracks with any ITB solution (or if I'm a dumbass and am using a live input like an amp or similar and I leave the track monitor on in Samp) I'll get a comb filtering effect that I find undesirable and it really cannot be helped because comb filtering begins at such tiny amounts of delay (or latency) no one will ever hear it except in that one use. My original post (which obviously has been taken wrong even as clear as I made it) was responding to someone who was putting someone else down for using many instances of AT and I was sticking up for the other guy saying that there is nothing wrong with layering tracks. Unfortunately I guess I forgot that when it comes to amps and guitars I need to ask permission what threads to post in. Even having paid and admiring AT (not from you Peter) it seems this issue is most prevalent in AT threads. If I offer my perspective on another approach as to how to best use AT for me (and I even go as far as stating I dont expect others to do the same)...in comes the same old thing. But I dont care one single bit because my perspective is valid and may inspire others. Apparently someone else has decided for me that I dont like AT and without consulting me first, funny once again in my post I made it clear that none of my options are better than the others. This only happens in AT threads though and it's not from IK dudes like yourself. If I didn't like AT it would be sitting in the box with GTR and a whole lot of other software I never use. Every time I get a new machine I seem to install less and less and keep what I like the best...so whoever has decided that I dislike AT is just plain wrong...but you know that. The bottom line is when I'm tracking I really want to be playing through what makes me the most comfortable even if there is no real reason other than that's how I like it. When I put my mixing cap on what I recorded with might not be the best choice, maybe it will need a little help...just like my original post was about...layering. I offer up a positive post and still it goes the same way, I must be a terrible person ---- I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012 RIP Reason L. and Ian B |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Member: #8838 Location: New England U.S.A. | ||
|
|||
Peter - IK Multimedia wrote: Ah come on, whether you like it or not it pretty much blows the latency thing out of the argument...
No |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Oct 2009 Member: #216688 | ||
|
|||
Custom Shop rules IMO. I know someone was making the point that you can get by using an amp sim with just a few amp types, & you probably can. But the amount of choice available in the custom shop now is amazing. Stand-out amps for me like CLEAN: Fender Twin Reverb, Jazz Amp-120, Metal Clean T Crunch/Hi Gain: Soldano, German Gain, Fender Super Sonic, Metal Lead V, Orange Thunderverb 200. All these Amps within Amplitube have their very own character & something really unique to each amp & IMO would take quite a bit of tweaking to clone what's going on in these amps. So its really nice to just have these amp types right there instead of having to spend ages sculpting the sound yourself.
Also thanks to the Custom shop I think I've found my absolute favourite Amp, the mighty Thunderverb 200 I just love the sound of this amp both the clean & the hi gain channels. The tones you can get in the Hi gain channel with just one shape knob are brilliant. Unfortunately I cant afford the real thing but I am going to get the TH30 head & cab, when I scrape enough cash together. So I love the sound of the Thunderverb (= I'm happy) I buy it from the custom shop (= IK is happy) & eventually I'm gonna purchase the Orange TH30 head & cab (= Orange is happy) So now we're all happy Anyone have or had a chance to play through the Orange Th30? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Mar 2008 Member: #175078 |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group







