|
|||
I thought AAX was another DirectX extension. I swear I tricked my other computer into recognizing AAX extension, so I could use plugins in a DAW. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Nov 2003 Member: #10484 | ||
|
|||
FaX wrote: whyterabbyt wrote: Other host developers? Is it? Of course not - they don't do CV / gate patching / audio spider merging / splitting and use a specific device called a Combinator do they.  That's why I wondered. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Sep 2001 Member: #1041 | ||
|
|||
whyterabbyt wrote: T-CM11 wrote: Anyone who makes RE's?
Im not sure I get your point, then. Could you explain? Do you mean that its a good thing that other developers who can make stuff for non-proprietry formats can now make them for even more proprietry formats too? There was a misunderstanding. I corrected it in my original post  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Member: #5693 Location: Ghent, Belgium | ||
|
|||
T-CM11 wrote: whyterabbyt wrote: T-CM11 wrote: Anyone who makes RE's?
Im not sure I get your point, then. Could you explain? Do you mean that its a good thing that other developers who can make stuff for non-proprietry formats can now make them for even more proprietry formats too? There was a misunderstanding. I corrected it in my original post sorry, i never saw the edit until after I'd posted. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Sep 2001 Member: #1041 | ||
|
|||
Makes me wonder.
How many 'moribund' vst formats there are....  ---- Barry The man who survived mustard gas and pepper spray is now a seasoned veteran http://www.ambientonline.org/ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Jun 2010 Member: #234424 Location: north of London ON | ||
|
|||
I think more than anything if Props can make that Prop Shop work for RE's then surely at least a few devs will consider following with thier own shop. The 30% cut from anything in the shop may be too tempting a revenue stream for other hosts devs (bigger ones) to resist regardless of fragmentation. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Member: #12152 Location: UK | ||
|
|||
It is certainly not the end, I will be amazed if nobody else gives it a go in the future 
It seems the audio software market is moving very quickly towards primarily making money from additional content, e.g NI give away Reaktor Player and then sell spark, mouth etc to run in it. What better way to control your premium content than develop a proprietary format which has to be sold through your own marketplace to ensure you get a cut of everything that is sold, such as RE. For me as a user, I think it is a disappointing direction the industry is heading in. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Member: #66287 | ||
|
|||
Reaper has some own VST extensions as well. We did lose MAS though...
http://www.kvraudio.com/wiki/?id=MAS ---- At school they taught me how to be. So pure in thought and word and deed. They didn't quite succeed. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Sep 2002 Member: #3863 Location: Gothenburg Sweden | ||
|
|||
Here's how I see it: some developers whose products I enjoy will spend less time on products I'm able to use.
EDIT: Oh, and prices may go up because of increased development time and/or the hiring of extra programmers. ---- I'm not your dog, so watch your language! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Member: #5257 Location: Vancouver | ||
|
|||
Keith99 wrote: I think the problem was VST 3, Steinberg messed up the release of that, if it had been welcomed by developers etc. it could have been a new standard
So the blame is on the only ones that offer an open format... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 May 2008 Member: #180187 Location: ssssskipping ......... I left you there | ||
|
|||
I would not say 'blame' no, they just misjudged the release as can be seen by the slow adoption. I am very much behind the VST format as the standard myself. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Member: #143846 Location: Yorkshire, England | ||
|
|||
standalone wrote: Keith99 wrote: I think the problem was VST 3, Steinberg messed up the release of that, if it had been welcomed by developers etc. it could have been a new standard
So the blame is on the only ones that offer an open format... They aren't the only open format, just the most widely accepted. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 30 Sep 2009 Member: #216524 | ||
|
|||
Just say no!! ---- Just face it, you have no idea how to use the software youve just bought |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 16 Dec 2002 Member: #5022 Location: over there | ||
|
|||
gpunk wrote: standalone wrote: Keith99 wrote: I think the problem was VST 3, Steinberg messed up the release of that, if it had been welcomed by developers etc. it could have been a new standard
So the blame is on the only ones that offer an open format... They aren't the only open format, just the most widely accepted. Open and multi-platform. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 May 2008 Member: #180187 Location: ssssskipping ......... I left you there | ||
|
|||
If only Steinberg had made VST3 less intimidating. What were they thinking?
And I'm pissed that Propellerheads still don't make a VST version of Reason. Third-party plug-ins are mostly irrelevant with ReWire, and I should just be able to use Reason as a VSTi. So much easier. ----  |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Member: #5913 Location: Vancouver, Canada |
| KVR Forum Index » Hosts (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.) | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
