|
|||
http://studioone.presonus.com/3259/but-does-it-really-sound- better/
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Studio One - our 1+1 results in the 2-iest of 2s! Not like those other jerks. Please tell me the folks who write the software at least had the grace to demean the author of that blog post behind his back. 
UPDATE: The post has been clarified via removal. See here. ---- I'm not your dog, so watch your language! Last edited by pough on Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:24 am; edited 2 times in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Member: #5257 Location: Vancouver | ||
|
|||
I always thought logic sounds best 
S1 has the best workflow for me, fast and efficient. I mean setting clip fades in logic is a pain in the a** for example... Last edited by sonicfire on Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 May 2004 Member: #24409 Location: somewhere in germany | ||
|
|||
sonicfire wrote: I always thought logic sounds best
No, your ears are deceiving you.  ---- I'm not your dog, so watch your language! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Jan 2003 Member: #5257 Location: Vancouver | ||
|
|||
nothing sounds better ---- I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012 RIP Reason L. and Ian B |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Member: #8838 Location: New England U.S.A. | ||
|
|||
Amiga sounds the best !!! come on !! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Member: #53722 | ||
|
|||
no one said "best", stop trying to derail this ---- I never learned anything from being right Hink 2012 RIP Reason L. and Ian B |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Member: #8838 Location: New England U.S.A. | ||
|
|||
Hink wrote: nothing sounds better
My inner John Cage agrees with you. Nothing sounds better than nothing. The sheer purity of nothingness ensures infinite gain with infinite signal-to-noise across the infinite bandwidth. Just wish it didn't take so long to download the demo. Maybe next lifetime. ---- perception: the stuff reality is made of. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Member: #56758 Location: Raincoast of Grayland | ||
|
|||
mandolarian wrote: Hink wrote: nothing sounds better
My inner John Cage agrees with you. Nothing sounds better than nothing. The sheer purity of nothingness ensures infinite gain with infinite signal-to-noise across the infinite bandwidth. This!!! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Member: #191286 Location: Here and there | ||
|
|||
 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
 ---- FL Studio 11 / Music Creator 6 Touch / One / Firebird+ / Aalto / Alchemy Player / Cumulus / Scanned Synth Pro / Strings Dream Synth / Consequence / Wusikstation / EVE / Harmless / Ohmboyz / Mobilohm / Hematohm / Predatohm / Eos |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 30 Mar 2007 Member: #145660 Location: virginia, US | ||
|
|||
Hink wrote: nothing sounds better
amen |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
Web2publicityfailnumber1000000000000000000000. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Member: #54189 Location: Hamilton, New Zealand | ||
|
|||
I can't tell if it sounds better because it keeps crashing, that is when it actually loads. It chokes on the same laptop that runs Reaper with Diva just fine. It showed 100% CPU use playing the first note of the default patch in Diva, then crashed. I hear it is so stable but so far that is definitely not my experience. Is there some minimum machine it needs to run on? I have a core duo with 2GB so it should meet the minimum requirements, but of course that isn't ideal. I hear how nice it it but I can't get it to run properly, where Reaper is really smooth, even when running Diva (albeit in draft). |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 | ||
|
|||
braj wrote: I can't tell if it sounds better because it keeps crashing, that is when it actually loads. It chokes on the same laptop that runs Reaper with Diva just fine. It showed 100% CPU use playing the first note of the default patch in Diva, then crashed. I hear it is so stable but so far that is definitely not my experience. Is there some minimum machine it needs to run on? I have a core duo with 2GB so it should meet the minimum requirements, but of course that isn't ideal. I hear how nice it it but I can't get it to run properly, where Reaper is really smooth, even when running Diva (albeit in draft).
Dude! I mean, seriously, DUDE! Stop complaining about such minor things - now will you? It sounds BETTER! And that's it! At Presonus, they finally reinvented the wheel, put Newton and any other mathematician or physician to shame - and you even DARE to complain about crashes? That is just ridiculous! As if crashes would be anything to write home about when you get that pristine, way superior sound quality. Didn't you read the news that all of Michael Jacksons albums will be mixed again (heck, they will even be recorded again!) just because they sound so bad, compared to what can be done in Studio One? You need a reality check, my son! - Sascha ---- There are 3 kinds of people: Those who can do maths and those who can't. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Nov 2000 Member: #69 Location: Hannover / Germany | ||
|
|||
Sascha Franck wrote: my son!
- Sascha Daddy! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Member: #12262 |
| KVR Forum Index » Hosts (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.) | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
