|
|||
Let the noodling commence. Last edited by D.H. Miltz on Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:19 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Member: #183273 | ||
|
|||
mmhhh... ...unless it's muted maybe... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Apr 2005 Member: #63988 Location: Unsettled | ||
|
|||
Quote: ...Monophony may not have underlying rhythmic textures, and must consist of only a melodic line.
It's not quite clear what that means - does the 'underlying rhythmic texture' refer to rhythm in the melodic part (such as arpeggiation), or does it refer to an accompanying rhythm (eg drum track)? I can see the latter being invalid, but not sure about arpeggiation - I don't really know how you could avoid any rhythm in the melody. Also, can the instrument providing the melody change? Eg singing, then whistling or something, so long as only one is present at a time? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Member: #255421 | ||
|
|||
kryptonaut wrote: Quote: ...Monophony may not have underlying rhythmic textures, and must consist of only a melodic line.
It's not quite clear what that means - does the 'underlying rhythmic texture' refer to rhythm in the melodic part (such as arpeggiation), or does it refer to an accompanying rhythm (eg drum track)? I can see the latter being invalid, but not sure about arpeggiation - I don't really know how you could avoid any rhythm in the melody. Also, can the instrument providing the melody change? Eg singing, then whistling or something, so long as only one is present at a time? The last part's easier to answer: I don't see why not. For that matter, you could have more than one instrument at the same time, as long as they're playing the same thing (octaves included/allowed). To me the part you quoted means above all No chords. And no accompanying rhythm track like a drum track either. Melody only is the idea. Does that help? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Member: #183273 | ||
|
|||
Thanks - 'no chords and no rhythm track' is pretty much what I thought, but when I saw Laguna's comment I wanted to make sure.
It will be fascinating to see what everyone comes up with - three minutes of pure melody feels like quite a challenge! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Member: #255421 | ||
|
|||
Oh, if I had time... Lots of room for careful use of richly-timbred instruments playing against each other... Flute and dulcimer, anyone? Does an organ count as monophonic? I can feel a piece in sections, cross-fading from one mood to another, all playing the one melody... The "call and answer" approach, maybe... Oh well. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Member: #5825 Location: London, UK | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Sep 2010 Member: #238812 | ||
|
|||
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8m-6bU4x7us
Peter Weirs classic Picnic at Hanging Rock. That haunting pan flute....May be that,it can not be mono in the strictest sense with that underlying stack swelling and subsiding........I just wanted to remember this classic. Most of you will be knowing about it. Some may get inspired |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Member: #114722 | ||
|
|||
When I think of monophonic music, I think of the verious asian forms, but they typically include percussion (like tabla in Indian music) and a drone (tanpura). Another example would be bagpipes. There's melody and an unchanging drone, but no harmony. The strict definition provided for this comp is rather limiting. Lets see what we come up with! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 19 Jan 2011 Member: #248278 Location: Texas | ||
|
|||
kryptonaut wrote: It will be fascinating to see what everyone comes up with - three minutes of pure melody feels like quite a challenge!
Yeah ! a challenge indeed. I guess it'll be a fun month |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Apr 2005 Member: #63988 Location: Unsettled | ||
|
|||
Emerald Tablet wrote: www.youreallfree.com/music/1205EmeraldTablet-mono.mp3
Woow ET, that was fast ! (and it's nice) A couple of years ago someone could have started a discussion complaining the reverb tails are too long... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Apr 2005 Member: #63988 Location: Unsettled | ||
|
|||
Thanks. All praise to Xoxos though for his "plucked" really
"plucked" is great because it behaves funny. Reverb and delay tails can never be too long. I always wondered what it is that makes us spot the difference between a long note slowly fading away ... a tone with long decay slowly fading away ... and a fat reverb on 50% with a very long decay slowly fading away. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Apr 2002 Member: #2425 Location: http://soundcloud.com/remcoh | ||
|
|||
I can't see how an arpeggio could not class as a melody, provided two of the notes don't overlap, since it is just notes in a scale.
I have a thinking this month, I may be disqualified..... (I want a drone note probably!!!!) |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Member: #276183 Location: Shrewsbury | ||
|
|||
Hm, may I use, say, some bass, flute, several drums, human voice. Playing one or two notes alternately as long as always only one note sounds? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Mar 2011 Member: #253122 Location: Schwerte, Germany | ||
|
|||
RuediRena wrote: Hm, may I use, say, some bass, flute, several drums, human voice. Playing one or two notes alternately as long as always only one note sounds?
That has something to do with Schoenberg's "Klangfarbenmelodie". from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klangfarbenmelodie: [...] splitting a musical line or melody between several instruments, rather than assigning it to just one instrument (or set of instruments), thereby adding color (timbre) and texture to the melodic line interesting point, it's not in contrast with the rules, IMHO. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Aug 2010 Member: #237966 Location: Cagliari - (Sardinia) |
| KVR Forum Index » Music Cafe | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group









