Plug-ins, Hosts, Apps,
Hardware, Soundware
Developers
(Brands)
Videos Groups
Whats's in?
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Music Search
KVR
   
KVR Forum » Effects
Thread Read
What are your favorite non-Valhalla reverbs, and why?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
Bronto Scorpio
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:22 pm reply with quote
toitoi wrote:
This awesome thread should become one of the Kvr classics.
Thumbs Up!

This thread is the new industry standard (Sorry....I couldn't resist any longer HiHi)

Cheers
Dennis
----
Back from the dead - Sorry if I didn't answer your mails/PM/whatever during the last few months. I hope everything will be back to normal soon. Life can take some shitty turns sometimes.
^ Joined: 13 Feb 2006  Member: #98170  Location: Wiesmoor, Germany
waltercruz
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:12 pm reply with quote
Wow, the reverb on Bruce Springsteen Nebraska is amazing. Loved it.

Speaking about reverbs, I love the reverb on that piano:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-uY_SoR110

Epic thread!
^ Joined: 03 Dec 2011  Member: #270009  
pheeleep
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:51 pm reply with quote
My most memorable "natural" reverb was a tunnel that took you from one side of a hill to the other. Must have been 10 feet tall, 15 feet wide, and at least 40 feet in length. The inside looked like aluminum (?) The walls, ceiling, were some kind of metal. It was buried deep covered in dirt and with dirt on the side. Well, a tunnel Smile It was in Northern California. I remember really wishing I could record an impulse.
----
Play it by ear
^ Joined: 11 Jun 2003  Member: #7580  
publicradio
KVRist
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 1:27 pm reply with quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3gprl6TxIY
^ Joined: 22 Mar 2008  Member: #176796  
shalako
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 2:15 pm reply with quote
Softubes TSAR-1
- Some reverbs sound too dry but this one doesn't
- It doesn't sound muddy (lots of reverbs do)
- One of the more natural sounding reverbs
- Sounds more like a hardware reverb.
- Simple but flexible (some reverbs are overly complex, the simplisity of the controls means you can get a good sound without excessive tweaking)
----
Imperfection is beauty.

Normally I hate adds, but not at KVR, look at all the the toys I can get.

Electronic Punk - Group @ Soundcloud
^ Joined: 09 Jul 2010  Member: #235302  Location: Wellington, New Zealand
valhallasound
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 3:04 pm reply with quote
publicradio wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3gprl6TxIY


That's just beautiful.

Given the era, it pretty much has to be a chamber. It's unclear whether it is a purpose-built chamber, or a speaker set up in an old tiled men's room or the like (which was apparently a common practice during that time). It would be interesting to find out what sort of speaker, power amp and microphones would have been in common use for chamber applications.

Sean Costello
^ Joined: 14 Nov 2006  Member: #128465  Location: Pacific NW
Doug1978
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 3:39 pm reply with quote


I like the sound of Lexicon reverbs and was very lucky to be able to pick up the PCM Native version for less than half price here at KVR market approx 18 months ago.

However, all said and done, Vahalla reverbs (I have Shimmer) are excellent too - and a lot cheaper as well. Redline Reverb is also pretty good.

Smile
^ Joined: 19 Jun 2011  Member: #259079  Location: Sendai, Japan
valhallasound
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 6:15 pm reply with quote
Doug1978(tempID) wrote:


I like the sound of Lexicon reverbs and was very lucky to be able to pick up the PCM Native version for less than half price here at KVR market approx 18 months ago.


Let's open this up to wider discussion: What are the characteristics of Lexicon style reverbs that people like?

In order to frame the conversation, here are the plugins that I know of that are Lexicon style algorithms:

CSR (reverse engineered PCM91 algorithms with simplified modulation, coded by Martin Lind in 2006)
Breverb (reverse engineered PCM91)
Breverb 2 (same as above, with some new stuff)
Lexicon PCM/LXP/MPX (coded by Michael Carnes at Lexicon, based on topologies originally developed by Griesinger, but extended with new allpass delays from Barry Blesser)
Relab LX480 (reverse engineered 480L Random Hall algorithm, coded by Martin Lind)
SSL X-Verb (reverse engineered 480L with some modifications, coded by Martin Lind)
UAD 224 (reverse engineered by [REDACTED] and Universal Audio staff)

It is worth noting that the algorithms in the above algorithms are largely of the "Rich Plate/Chamber" technology first developed for the 224XL, and extended in the 480L and later reverbs. A few of the algorithms (the PCM bundle Concert Hall and UAD 224) are based around the 224 algorithms, which are fairly different topologies.

The better Lexicon emulations (and the Lexicon boxes themselves - I have a few) can sound a bit grainy with sharp transients, yet sound "transparent" and wide in a mix. To my ears, both the 224 algorithms and later Lexicon algorithms have a "clear" sound. I would love to hear other listener's thoughts on this topic.

Sean Costello
^ Joined: 14 Nov 2006  Member: #128465  Location: Pacific NW
Shy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 8:58 pm reply with quote
valhallasound wrote:
The better Lexicon emulations (and the Lexicon boxes themselves - I have a few) can sound a bit grainy with sharp transients, yet sound "transparent" and wide in a mix. To my ears, both the 224 algorithms and later Lexicon algorithms have a "clear" sound. I would love to hear other listener's thoughts on this topic.

Here's an important thought: all the algorithms in 480L, for example, can sound smooth (just raise the diffusion level) and still sound "clear" and "wide". It also works fine in a mix either way.

Here are examples with the 480L ambience and plate algorithms. (dry samples included)
----
"Music is spiritual. The music business is not." - Claudio Monteverdi
^ Joined: 26 Jun 2004  Member: #30980  
dsynth27
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2012 10:47 pm reply with quote
Lexicon MPX and EWQL Spaces....very clean sound never muddy. EWQL Spaces very organic and warm - beautiful variety of reverbs (the ambient verbs are terrific). Great combination of algo and convolution reverb. Space Designer and Eos are nice also...! Cool
^ Joined: 15 Aug 2011  Member: #262776  
parma
KVRist
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 1:26 am reply with quote
I love the way this is recorded. The closeness and the room tone really enhance the mood.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdEuCRiW2l0&feature=related
----
SWECK
^ Joined: 21 Apr 2004  Member: #22039  
budweiser
KVRist
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 2:02 am reply with quote
Virsyn Reflect is an amazing peace of gear that works in every situation. With artsacoustic reverb, it's my favourite. The KR-reverb (freeware) is also pretty good, imo. Very Happy
^ Joined: 14 Oct 2006  Member: #124229  Location: france
antithesist
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 2:09 am reply with quote
Quote:
[REDACTED]


Damned CIA.
^ Joined: 08 Feb 2012  Member: #274692  
valhallasound
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 2:19 am reply with quote
Shy wrote:
valhallasound wrote:
The better Lexicon emulations (and the Lexicon boxes themselves - I have a few) can sound a bit grainy with sharp transients, yet sound "transparent" and wide in a mix. To my ears, both the 224 algorithms and later Lexicon algorithms have a "clear" sound. I would love to hear other listener's thoughts on this topic.

Here's an important thought: all the algorithms in 480L, for example, can sound smooth (just raise the diffusion level) and still sound "clear" and "wide". It also works fine in a mix either way.

Here are examples with the 480L ambience and plate algorithms. (dry samples included)


Are you using any presets with these? If so, which ones? I'm interested in how Shape, Spread and Size are set for the Plate examples.

Sean Costello
^ Joined: 14 Nov 2006  Member: #128465  Location: Pacific NW
Shy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 2:45 am reply with quote
Ah, from what I remember, shape 127, spread 0, size 27. bass decay 1.2x, hf decay 0.6x, hf crossover ~4khz, bass crossover ~500hz
----
"Music is spiritual. The music business is not." - Claudio Monteverdi
^ Joined: 26 Jun 2004  Member: #30980  
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Printable version
Page 10 of 17
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
Display posts from previous:   
ReplyNew TopicPrevious TopicNext Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Username: Password:  
KVR Developer Challenge 2012