|
|||
toitoi wrote: This awesome thread should become one of the Kvr classics. This thread is the new industry standard (Sorry....I couldn't resist any longer Cheers Dennis ---- Back from the dead - Sorry if I didn't answer your mails/PM/whatever during the last few months. I hope everything will be back to normal soon. Life can take some shitty turns sometimes. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Member: #98170 Location: Wiesmoor, Germany | ||
|
|||
Wow, the reverb on Bruce Springsteen Nebraska is amazing. Loved it.
Speaking about reverbs, I love the reverb on that piano: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-uY_SoR110 Epic thread! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Dec 2011 Member: #270009 | ||
|
|||
My most memorable "natural" reverb was a tunnel that took you from one side of a hill to the other. Must have been 10 feet tall, 15 feet wide, and at least 40 feet in length. The inside looked like aluminum (?) The walls, ceiling, were some kind of metal. It was buried deep covered in dirt and with dirt on the side. Well, a tunnel ---- Play it by ear |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Member: #7580 | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Mar 2008 Member: #176796 | ||
|
|||
Softubes TSAR-1
- Some reverbs sound too dry but this one doesn't - It doesn't sound muddy (lots of reverbs do) - One of the more natural sounding reverbs - Sounds more like a hardware reverb. - Simple but flexible (some reverbs are overly complex, the simplisity of the controls means you can get a good sound without excessive tweaking) ---- Imperfection is beauty. Normally I hate adds, but not at KVR, look at all the the toys I can get. Electronic Punk - Group @ Soundcloud |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Jul 2010 Member: #235302 Location: Wellington, New Zealand | ||
|
|||
publicradio wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3gprl6TxIY
That's just beautiful. Given the era, it pretty much has to be a chamber. It's unclear whether it is a purpose-built chamber, or a speaker set up in an old tiled men's room or the like (which was apparently a common practice during that time). It would be interesting to find out what sort of speaker, power amp and microphones would have been in common use for chamber applications. Sean Costello ---- Plugins: http://www.valhalladsp.com Blog: http://valhalladsp.wordpress.com KVR Subforum: http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=146 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Nov 2006 Member: #128465 Location: Pacific NW | ||
|
|||
I like the sound of Lexicon reverbs and was very lucky to be able to pick up the PCM Native version for less than half price here at KVR market approx 18 months ago. However, all said and done, Vahalla reverbs (I have Shimmer) are excellent too - and a lot cheaper as well. Redline Reverb is also pretty good. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 19 Jun 2011 Member: #259079 Location: Sendai, Japan | ||
|
|||
Doug1978(tempID) wrote: I like the sound of Lexicon reverbs and was very lucky to be able to pick up the PCM Native version for less than half price here at KVR market approx 18 months ago. Let's open this up to wider discussion: What are the characteristics of Lexicon style reverbs that people like? In order to frame the conversation, here are the plugins that I know of that are Lexicon style algorithms: CSR (reverse engineered PCM91 algorithms with simplified modulation, coded by Martin Lind in 2006) Breverb (reverse engineered PCM91) Breverb 2 (same as above, with some new stuff) Lexicon PCM/LXP/MPX (coded by Michael Carnes at Lexicon, based on topologies originally developed by Griesinger, but extended with new allpass delays from Barry Blesser) Relab LX480 (reverse engineered 480L Random Hall algorithm, coded by Martin Lind) SSL X-Verb (reverse engineered 480L with some modifications, coded by Martin Lind) UAD 224 (reverse engineered by [REDACTED] and Universal Audio staff) It is worth noting that the algorithms in the above algorithms are largely of the "Rich Plate/Chamber" technology first developed for the 224XL, and extended in the 480L and later reverbs. A few of the algorithms (the PCM bundle Concert Hall and UAD 224) are based around the 224 algorithms, which are fairly different topologies. The better Lexicon emulations (and the Lexicon boxes themselves - I have a few) can sound a bit grainy with sharp transients, yet sound "transparent" and wide in a mix. To my ears, both the 224 algorithms and later Lexicon algorithms have a "clear" sound. I would love to hear other listener's thoughts on this topic. Sean Costello ---- Plugins: http://www.valhalladsp.com Blog: http://valhalladsp.wordpress.com KVR Subforum: http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=146 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Nov 2006 Member: #128465 Location: Pacific NW | ||
|
|||
valhallasound wrote: The better Lexicon emulations (and the Lexicon boxes themselves - I have a few) can sound a bit grainy with sharp transients, yet sound "transparent" and wide in a mix. To my ears, both the 224 algorithms and later Lexicon algorithms have a "clear" sound. I would love to hear other listener's thoughts on this topic.
Here's an important thought: all the algorithms in 480L, for example, can sound smooth (just raise the diffusion level) and still sound "clear" and "wide". It also works fine in a mix either way. Here are examples with the 480L ambience and plate algorithms. (dry samples included) ---- "Music is spiritual. The music business is not." - Claudio Monteverdi |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Member: #30980 | ||
|
|||
Lexicon MPX and EWQL Spaces....very clean sound never muddy. EWQL Spaces very organic and warm - beautiful variety of reverbs (the ambient verbs are terrific). Great combination of algo and convolution reverb. Space Designer and Eos are nice also...! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 15 Aug 2011 Member: #262776 | ||
|
|||
I love the way this is recorded. The closeness and the room tone really enhance the mood.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdEuCRiW2l0&feature=related |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Member: #22039 | ||
|
|||
Virsyn Reflect is an amazing peace of gear that works in every situation. With artsacoustic reverb, it's my favourite. The KR-reverb (freeware) is also pretty good, imo. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Member: #124229 Location: france | ||
|
|||
Quote: [REDACTED]
Damned CIA. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Feb 2012 Member: #274692 | ||
|
|||
Shy wrote: valhallasound wrote: The better Lexicon emulations (and the Lexicon boxes themselves - I have a few) can sound a bit grainy with sharp transients, yet sound "transparent" and wide in a mix. To my ears, both the 224 algorithms and later Lexicon algorithms have a "clear" sound. I would love to hear other listener's thoughts on this topic.
Here's an important thought: all the algorithms in 480L, for example, can sound smooth (just raise the diffusion level) and still sound "clear" and "wide". It also works fine in a mix either way. Here are examples with the 480L ambience and plate algorithms. (dry samples included) Are you using any presets with these? If so, which ones? I'm interested in how Shape, Spread and Size are set for the Plate examples. Sean Costello ---- Plugins: http://www.valhalladsp.com Blog: http://valhalladsp.wordpress.com KVR Subforum: http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=146 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Nov 2006 Member: #128465 Location: Pacific NW | ||
|
|||
Ah, from what I remember, shape 127, spread 0, size 27. bass decay 1.2x, hf decay 0.6x, hf crossover ~4khz, bass crossover ~500hz ---- "Music is spiritual. The music business is not." - Claudio Monteverdi |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 26 Jun 2004 Member: #30980 |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group





