|
|||
I just came across this, and was underwhelmed at Cubase's performance compared to some others (even free ones!! - R8BRAIN & EAC3TO)
http://src.infinitewave.ca/ Does the quality of SRC within a host come to play in what goes on internally (behind the scenes), and ultimately the final audio output quality? Or does it only matter during render when changing the sample rate, say 96 to 44.1? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Member: #13429 Location: Planet Earth...for now | ||
|
|||
What is this "SRC" and what exactly is one supposedly looking at in the tests? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
SRC = Sample Rate Conversion
The graphs can be a little confusing - reading their help page got me a little better understanding of what I was looking at |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Member: #13429 Location: Planet Earth...for now | ||
|
|||
I gave up on SR other than 44.1 a long time ago (many reasons)
I guess that doesn't apply here........ |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
At some point you just have to ignore the scientific minutia and ask yourself the only question that really matters... does the music sound good to you? If not, SRC (or dither or ADC timing being off two samples or any of the other minutia that is regularly way overblown) is likely not the cause.
Graphs and charts and tests have a way of distracting you from the really important stuff. My $0.02 fwiw. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Member: #50422 | ||
|
|||
LawrenceF wrote: At some point you just have to ignore the scientific minutia and ask yourself the only question that really matters... does the music sound good to you? If not, SRC (or dither or ADC timing being off two samples or any of the other minutia that is regularly way overblown) is likely not the cause.
Graphs and charts and tests have a way of distracting you from the really important stuff. My $0.02 fwiw. It's more like your $1000000... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Sep 2005 Member: #80666 Location: Oulu, Finland | ||
|
|||
it matters if you can hear it. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Member: #163537 Location: No | ||
|
|||
I'll bet 50 quatloos that before this thread is over at least 5 know assailants will have jumped in to personally insult anyone who DARES say there is any difference. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
LawrenceF wrote: At some point you just have to ignore the scientific minutia and ask yourself the only question that really matters... does the music sound good to you? If not, SRC (or dither or ADC timing being off two samples or any of the other minutia that is regularly way overblown) is likely not the cause.
+7Graphs and charts and tests have a way of distracting you from the really important stuff. My $0.02 fwiw. ---- Back from the dead - Sorry if I didn't answer your mails/PM/whatever during the last few months. I hope everything will be back to normal soon. Life can take some shitty turns sometimes. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Member: #98170 Location: Wiesmoor, Germany | ||
|
|||
Some even very expensive DAWs are known to perform poorly at SRC. Can you actually hear that? Maybe not. But if it makes you sleep better (or if you're into producing music for audiophiles), might as well use a freebie that does a better job. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Jan 2005 Member: #55591 | ||
|
|||
I can hear it, I can hear a bird fart in outer Mongolia and I live in kalifornia. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
The site talked about audio smearing, blurring and loss of clarity with poor sample rate conversion, but you guys say "meh, so what". It also talked about how SRCs are going on in the background within a DAW all the time. This poor SRC doesn't add up...doesn't matter? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Member: #13429 Location: Planet Earth...for now | ||
|
|||
Don't listen to my sarcastic and failed attempts at humor. I wish I knew what it meant myself. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
be happy if you can't hear aliasing!
i left reason because of it. it may have improved since then. cubase uses different src qualities depending on what it does. generally full quality is expensive and therefor not that good an idea for things like samplers or scrubbing. also please look at what levels the colors mean, they are more important than the aliasing-vs-noise-structure itself.. ---- You're my son, dude! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Apr 2004 Member: #22499 | ||
|
|||
frankly the whole exercise reads like someone looking for a solution to a problem they don't actually have. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Member: #163537 Location: No |
| KVR Forum Index » Hosts (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.) | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group















