|
|||
mkdr wrote: Who invented the zero delay feedback filters?
Is the data of implementing them publicized somewhere? As far as I know original credit would go for Vadim Zavalishin. For implementing them, just look at the currently on-going discussion on the DSP development section of the forum. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Member: #97939 Location: Helsinki, Finland | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Apr 2002 Member: #2445 Location: Poissy, France | ||
|
|||
mystran wrote: mkdr wrote: Who invented the zero delay feedback filters?
Is the data of implementing them publicized somewhere? As far as I know original credit would go for Vadim Zavalishin. Edit: that's why I prefer the term TPT (topology-preserving transform). Zero-delay feedback is just one (probably the most important) aspect of it. Regards, Vadim Last edited by Z1202 on Mon May 21, 2012 8:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Apr 2002 Member: #2472 | ||
|
|||
mystran wrote: mkdr wrote: Who invented the zero delay feedback filters?
Is the data of implementing them publicized somewhere? As far as I know original credit would go for Vadim Zavalishin. For implementing them, just look at the currently on-going discussion on the DSP development section of the forum. There is a Reaktor core tutorial here: http://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/ni_media/downloa ds/pdf/KeepTopologyRC.pdf http://co.native-instruments.com/index.php?id=userlibrary&ty pe=0&ulbr=1&plview=detail&patchid=7769 http://co.native-instruments.com/index.php?id=userlibrary&ty pe=0&ulbr=1&plview=detail&patchid=7775 Ingo |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Member: #176645 Location: Hannover, Germany | ||
|
|||
Z1202 wrote: mystran wrote: mkdr wrote: Who invented the zero delay feedback filters?
Is the data of implementing them publicized somewhere? As far as I know original credit would go for Vadim Zavalishin. Edit: that's why I prefer the term TPT (topology-preserving transform). Zero-delay feedback is just one (probably the most important) aspect of it. Fair enough. One could argue even wave digital filters are pretty much the same concept. As far as TPT, yes I think it's a better term. Like I pointed out in the other thread, I think the big deal isn't getting rid of some delays, but instead the fact that you can forget the concept of directional signal flow and treat everything as a bunch of simultaneous differential equations. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Feb 2006 Member: #97939 Location: Helsinki, Finland | ||
|
|||
Cyforce wrote: Maybe it would be better instead of trying to expand the quality limit more and more and more with new ideas/codes/methods etc, to expand the effectivity? What we have from synths which sounding superb, but we couldn't use them as we would like to?.... It is not either or... I am glad some developers focus on maximum sound quality. And others are focused elsewhere. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Feb 2005 Member: #56776 Location: in the wilds | ||
|
|||
Congratulations to Lotuzia and Urs for making peace BTW: I, for one, was pleasantly surprised at the tone of Lotuzia's last post! Last edited by Howard on Mon May 21, 2012 11:23 am; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 May 2004 Member: #26645 Location: Germany | ||
|
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Dec 2008 Member: #195613 Location: Minneapolis | ||
|
|||
A little too much of a thread derailment perhaps? ---- RIP Reason Lahalla |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 28 May 2005 Member: #69942 Location: Netherlands | ||
|
|||
[Note: xherv's and Nielzie's comments above refer to posts that I have moved.]
Nielzie wrote: A little too much of a thread derailment perhaps?
Not any more. Split. Again. Since splits aren't working, a warning: Mods do have another method of dealing with such stuff besides locking and splitting threads. Much as I dislike it, next time that kind of garbage happens I will use it. I'll feel bad for doing so, but one more drop in the bucket won't be much of a deal. Do everyone a favor:
Not my license plate; saw it this morning at the river. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 10 Jun 2004 Member: #29021 Location: Pony Pasture | ||
|
|||
Z1202 wrote: There have been numerous other papers on ZDF written earlier (although I wasn't aware of them at the time of writing mine
Do you talk about this ZDF? http://www.zdf.de/ That one is already 49 years old... Ingo |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 Mar 2008 Member: #176645 Location: Hannover, Germany | ||
|
|||
Ingonator wrote: Z1202 wrote: There have been numerous other papers on ZDF written earlier (although I wasn't aware of them at the time of writing mine
Do you talk about this ZDF? http://www.zdf.de/ That one is already 49 years old... Ingo ZDF |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 Feb 2009 Member: #199855 Location: Germany | ||
|
|||
Ingonator wrote: Z1202 wrote: There have been numerous other papers on ZDF written earlier (although I wasn't aware of them at the time of writing mine
Do you talk about this ZDF? http://www.zdf.de/ That one is already 49 years old... Ingo |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 13 Aug 2011 Member: #262624 Location: Berlin | ||
|
|||
Ingonator wrote: Z1202 wrote: There have been numerous other papers on ZDF written earlier (although I wasn't aware of them at the time of writing mine
Do you talk about this ZDF? http://www.zdf.de/ That one is already 49 years old... Ingo |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 11 Apr 2002 Member: #2472 | ||
|
|||
Ingonator wrote:
And they are absolutely not 0 delay. I would say they are notorious about the delay they cause (and don't ask me how I know)..... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Member: #255414 |
| KVR Forum Index » Instruments | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group


- for me
















