|
|||
Reaper's default MIDI editing is/was clunky - that's the perfect word to describe it (it's the word I originally thought of to describe it before it was used later in this thread). The MIDI side of things is functional - you can program MIDI in reaper - it's just not particularly user-friendly OOTB. And while you can customise to your heart's content and probably get it working the way you want, you could also just use something that works more efficiently out of the box and use the time it'd take to customise reaper to make music instead.
I really liked reaper for audio last time I tried it but I didn't have the patience to set up the MIDI editing the way I wanted it to be. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Member: #21603 | ||
|
|||
I'm late to this party. I have a reaper license and I've been trying to "get into" reaper for about 2 years, so I'd like to learn more...
For one thing, why do people always cite routing in reaper as a big deal? As far as I can tell the routing consists of a matrix mixer. Sure there's a lot you can do with matrix routing, but it's not what I would consider mind-blowing (especially coming from other programs with modular routing interfaces). One other thing that's always bothered me is that for all the options and flexibility, there doesn't seem to be something as simple as sound-on-sound loop overdubbing for audio (only midi), which is available on all sorts of more limited recording environments and hardware. satYatunes wrote: Routing is one aspect where Reaper shines, apart from rest of the amazing features. Most flexible routing that you can find in any DAW. It can either be a positive thing or negative, depends on you. I totally agree with Kx.001 on customization and MIDI. Be very very patient with the customization and once you are happy keep saving the configurations otherwise with ever frequent updates you never know when something gets broken. I would also recommend a good theme, v4 default is nice but still take a look at the REACTION or RADO theme, gorgeous looking. And finally be prepared to address everything with "Rea" prefix.. e.g. ReaDelay, ReaVerb, ReaThis, ReaThat and so on |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Apr 2011 Member: #253852 | ||
|
|||
Tricky-Loops wrote: You CAN edit the MIDI of more than one clip if you have them as ghost copies (or MIDI file reference)..
Try opening two or more different clips or tracks directly and editing the notes on them at the same time. Not talking "clip properties" or ghost copies, but actual note editing on different unrelated clips. Unless I misseed something about what's probably the biggest midi FR for Reaper. Anyway, carry on. See rule #2. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Member: #50422 | ||
|
|||
liquidsound wrote: trueparadox wrote: liquidsound wrote: Ghost is like an everyday thing in MuLab or energyXT. I'm surprised it was not so popular with reaper users.
I got the Pianoroll as I like except the diselect notes which I need to use a keyboard modifier still. I'm too new to this. I have my side mousebutton for deselect. It works really well for me. Recommend it Hehe, yea, you really should. With a mouse with two side buttons, you get so much functionality it's crazy! I have deselect on one, and toggle zoom on the other. But then you have ctrl+mouse, shift+mouse, alt+mouse, ctrl+shift+mouse, and if you really need it, ctrl+alt+mouse (not as comfortable to press, ctrl+shift are easy to press if your keyboard aligns them). So, that's 8 "more" buttons to use in the midi editor. I have double/halve note length and increase/decrease grid size. Havent thought up useful things for the others yet, but that's a nice problem to have. And then of course you have all the mouse modifiers, but im using them for selection of notes, mostly. ---- "I didn't lose my mind, it was mine to give away." |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Member: #127833 | ||
|
|||
liquidsound wrote: trueparadox wrote: liquidsound wrote: Ghost is like an everyday thing in MuLab or energyXT. I'm surprised it was not so popular with reaper users.
I got the Pianoroll as I like except the diselect notes which I need to use a keyboard modifier still. I'm too new to this. I have my side mousebutton for deselect. It works really well for me. Recommend it I'm going to see how this works with my wacom tablet. I should be able to assign these things to my buttons, and the "radial" menu. Sweet! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Mar 2003 Member: #6316 Location: San Diego | ||
|
|||
revo11 wrote: I'm late to this party. I have a reaper license and I've been trying to "get into" reaper for about 2 years, so I'd like to learn more...
What do you mean by "sound-on-sound loop overdubbing"?? In REAPER you can put a loop on another loop on another loop and so on (if that's what you intend with overdubbing), and it works...For one thing, why do people always cite routing in reaper as a big deal? As far as I can tell the routing consists of a matrix mixer. Sure there's a lot you can do with matrix routing, but it's not what I would consider mind-blowing (especially coming from other programs with modular routing interfaces). One other thing that's always bothered me is that for all the options and flexibility, there doesn't seem to be something as simple as sound-on-sound loop overdubbing for audio (only midi), which is available on all sorts of more limited recording environments and hardware. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Member: #276810 Location: South Bavaria - near the alps... :-) | ||
|
|||
Yes continuous loop recording where you hear all your previous layers of recording. Pretty damn basic, but last I checked this was only implemented with midi data and was not possible for audio recording. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Tricky-Loops wrote: revo11 wrote: I'm late to this party. I have a reaper license and I've been trying to "get into" reaper for about 2 years, so I'd like to learn more...
What do you mean by "sound-on-sound loop overdubbing"?? In REAPER you can put a loop on another loop on another loop and so on (if that's what you intend with overdubbing), and it works...For one thing, why do people always cite routing in reaper as a big deal? As far as I can tell the routing consists of a matrix mixer. Sure there's a lot you can do with matrix routing, but it's not what I would consider mind-blowing (especially coming from other programs with modular routing interfaces). One other thing that's always bothered me is that for all the options and flexibility, there doesn't seem to be something as simple as sound-on-sound loop overdubbing for audio (only midi), which is available on all sorts of more limited recording environments and hardware. Last edited by revo11 on Sat Jul 28, 2012 2:53 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 02 Apr 2011 Member: #253852 | ||
|
|||
LawrenceF wrote: Tricky-Loops wrote: You CAN edit the MIDI of more than one clip if you have them as ghost copies (or MIDI file reference)..
Try opening two or more different clips or tracks directly and editing the notes on them at the same time. Not talking "clip properties" or ghost copies, but actual note editing on different unrelated clips. Unless I misseed something about what's probably the biggest midi FR for Reaper. Anyway, carry on. See rule #2. That's right, but I never have missed this feature. Do you really have so many different (unrelated) clips whereon you want to edit the notes simultaneously? For example, if you want to change the velocity CC or expression CC of some notes (of different clips) to the same value, did you mean that? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Member: #276810 Location: South Bavaria - near the alps... :-) | ||
|
|||
revo11 wrote: I'm late to this party. I have a reaper license and I've been trying to "get into" reaper for about 2 years, so I'd like to learn more...
For one thing, why do people always cite routing in reaper as a big deal? As far as I can tell the routing consists of a matrix mixer. Sure there's a lot you can do with matrix routing, but it's not what I would consider mind-blowing (especially coming from other programs with modular routing interfaces). The matrix is an optional routing interface. I never use it. The routing isn't about the matrix, it's about how signal paths can be set up. Any track can send/receive to any other track, on any configuration of track channels that you choose. Multiple signal paths can be set up on a single track. MIDI and audio can exist on a single track. You can do feedback routing. What it boils down to is that you can route things in pretty much any way that you see fit without a bunch of bs, which wasn't the case at all when I left Cubase. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 01 May 2009 Member: #206450 | ||
|
|||
trueparadox wrote: liquidsound wrote: trueparadox wrote: liquidsound wrote: Ghost is like an everyday thing in MuLab or energyXT. I'm surprised it was not so popular with reaper users.
I got the Pianoroll as I like except the diselect notes which I need to use a keyboard modifier still. I'm too new to this. I have my side mousebutton for deselect. It works really well for me. Recommend it Hehe, yea, you really should. With a mouse with two side buttons, you get so much functionality it's crazy! I have deselect on one, and toggle zoom on the other. But then you have ctrl+mouse, shift+mouse, alt+mouse, ctrl+shift+mouse, and if you really need it, ctrl+alt+mouse (not as comfortable to press, ctrl+shift are easy to press if your keyboard aligns them). So, that's 8 "more" buttons to use in the midi editor. I have double/halve note length and increase/decrease grid size. Havent thought up useful things for the others yet, but that's a nice problem to have. And then of course you have all the mouse modifiers, but im using them for selection of notes, mostly. As long is not a wireless mouse. I wonder if Space Ball would do as well.... I'll need to borrow one of those. ---- MuLab 4, Studio One v2. In that order. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 30 May 2006 Member: #108991 Location: US / Italy | ||
|
|||
revo11 wrote: Yes continuous loop recording where you hear all your previous layers of recording. Pretty damn basic, but last I checked this was only implemented with midi data and was not possible for audio recording. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Tricky-Loops wrote: revo11 wrote: I'm late to this party. I have a reaper license and I've been trying to "get into" reaper for about 2 years, so I'd like to learn more...
What do you mean by "sound-on-sound loop overdubbing"?? In REAPER you can put a loop on another loop on another loop and so on (if that's what you intend with overdubbing), and it works...For one thing, why do people always cite routing in reaper as a big deal? As far as I can tell the routing consists of a matrix mixer. Sure there's a lot you can do with matrix routing, but it's not what I would consider mind-blowing (especially coming from other programs with modular routing interfaces). One other thing that's always bothered me is that for all the options and flexibility, there doesn't seem to be something as simple as sound-on-sound loop overdubbing for audio (only midi), which is available on all sorts of more limited recording environments and hardware. Right, (audio) TAKES overdubbing isn't possible in REAPER. But I've always explored the recorded (audio) takes in new tracks, so I didn't had any problem with it. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Member: #276810 Location: South Bavaria - near the alps... :-) | ||
|
|||
I just signed up to the Groove3 Reaper tutorials. Let's see if this thing can sink under my skin... ---- MuLab 4, Studio One v2. In that order. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 30 May 2006 Member: #108991 Location: US / Italy | ||
|
|||
It's like the reaper forum Lawrence, you wanna field this? I will say that I don't feel like adding a 78% quantize to the couple of hundred midi clips I have (trilian, superior drummer, etc) |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
liquidsound wrote: I just signed up to the Groove3 Reaper tutorials. Let's see if this thing can sink under my skin...
I loved it. Worth the money. Please keep us posted on your thoughts. I was really impressed with what I learned, and will go through it again since there were so many goodies it was hard to keep up. I suggest you follow what he's doing in Reaper. Enjoy! |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 12 Mar 2003 Member: #6316 Location: San Diego | ||
|
|||
hibidy wrote: Lawrence, you wanna field this?
Pass. I've had this discussion 1000 times and it always ends badly. Anyway, Reaper is a really great product imo. Jusst remember rule #2. Last edited by LawrenceF on Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Member: #50422 |
| KVR Forum Index » Hosts (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.) | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group






