Plug-ins, Hosts, Apps,
Hardware, Soundware
Developers
(Brands)
Videos Groups
Whats's in?
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Music Search
KVR
   
KVR Forum » Instruments
Thread Read
Poll: What would be the best format to convert PRIZM to for the Mac?

What would be the best format to convert PRIZM to for the Mac?
Kontakt
85%
 85%  [12]
EXS 24
7%
 7%  [1]
Wave/AIFF files
0%
 0%  [0]
Soundfont SF2 files
0%
 0%  [0]
SFZ
7%
 7%  [1]
Halion
0%
 0%  [0]
Other - I will mention it below
0%
 0%  [0]
Total Votes : 14

Karmacomposer
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:41 pm reply with quote
I am going to begin the process of converting PRIZM's 16GB core library to another format so it can work cross-platform on the Mac and PC.

Question is, what format would that be?

Please fill out the poll to help me decide.

Mike
^ Joined: 07 Nov 2005  Member: #86946  Location: Florida
xamido
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:22 pm reply with quote
Just convert everything to kontakt mike. Once you do it, it will be a no brainer for me.
----
GAS
^ Joined: 01 May 2010  Member: #230948  
Karmacomposer
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:50 pm reply with quote
The good news is that Kontakt was ALWAYS planned.

I'll probably have to do it as monolith files, however.

Mike
^ Joined: 07 Nov 2005  Member: #86946  Location: Florida
Karmacomposer
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:47 am reply with quote
Wow. A whole 6 people voted.

Mike
^ Joined: 07 Nov 2005  Member: #86946  Location: Florida
Spitfire31
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:42 am reply with quote
Hm. I read the only user review available here on KVR <http://www.kvraudio.com/product/prizm-atmospheric-synth-by- hardcore-harmonics-now-supersynths/reviews> and if that review is in fact as accurate as it seems to be, I think you have a lot more on your hands than just converting the core library to Kontakt format.

I guess that one major task would be to actually treat the samples as raw material and use the Kontakt synth engine tools for looping, filtering, LFOs, FX, and so on and so forth and in that process radically reduce the size of the library.

I have to say that I'd hardly plunk down the moola if I weren't convinced that the Kontakt/cross platform version had been upgraded to a thoroughly professional standard.

/Joachim
----
If it were easy, anybody would do it!
^ Joined: 18 May 2003  Member: #7226  Location: Sweden
BDeep
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:13 am reply with quote
I'm tempted to vote EXS24, because that's what I have. But I think Kontakt would be the best choice, it's highly configurable, cross-platform, and widely used as a platform for third party libraries. It just makes the most sense.
^ Joined: 13 Feb 2012  Member: #275048  Location: Amsterdam
fmr
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:52 am reply with quote
SFZ would be easy for you, and constitute a good alternative, since it is a very open format. That said, Kontakt is a kind of "de facto" standard, which is guaranted to generate sales, IMO. I would add both to the package, as a whole. This will cover pretty much all bases for you. Perhaps you could make use Kontakt 3, which files can be read by several other samplers. AFAIK this doesn't happen with Kontakt 5 (I just bought Komplete update, and I'm still waiting for it to test).
----
Fernando (FMR)
^ Joined: 16 Mar 2003  Member: #6378  Location: Porto - Portugal
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Printable version
Page 1 of 1
Display posts from previous:   
ReplyNew TopicPrevious TopicNext Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Username: Password:  
KVR Developer Challenge 2012