Plug-ins, Hosts, Apps,
Hardware, Soundware
Developers
(Brands)
Videos Groups
Whats's in?
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Music Search
KVR
   
KVR Forum » Effects
Thread Read
Why are there no close to hardware native vst effects?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
resistent
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:23 am reply with quote
Why do you think is there a lack of good emulators and beyond of filter banks (e.g. sherman filterbank) and tape delays (e.g. Roland Space Echo). I mean there are a lot of software synthesizer, EQs and compressor which reaches almost the audible quality of analog gear. so why are almost no effects out there with similar audible qualitys?

Maybe it's again capitalism. A synth sells better than a good filter emu or an bbd or and delay or a really good ringmodulator. The world seems to consists of subtractiv Synths, eqs, compressor & channel emulation. A shame.

Maybe u-he change the game. With Sascha Eversmeier there is an outstanding fx-developer on board he has always good ideas an an imagination of how a fx has to work. Wait for the first plugins.
----
LOVE*FIGHT*CREATE
-------------------------------------------
excusemyenglish
^ Joined: 14 Apr 2008  Member: #178388  Location: Berlin
Fred_Abstract
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:16 am reply with quote
soundtoys stuff is decent when compared to good hardware but depends what you are after.
^ Joined: 27 Nov 2009  Member: #220502  
theodore_whitmore
KVRist
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:37 am reply with quote
Custom and practice is one factor. Producers have been happily using digital versions of analogue effects for something like three decades. I don't think there is a huge commercial pressure to create accurate digital emulations.

Sanity is another factor. Closely emulating a Sherman Filterbank in full flight, with FM, AM, saturation and dual filter resonance would likely use the kind of CPU resources that the best VA synths do in high quality mode. I can justify spending a CPU core on a lead sound that is right at the front of the mix but maybe not on an effect that even discerning listeners only notice in passing.
^ Joined: 29 Jan 2013  Member: #297562  
thecontrolcentre
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:45 am reply with quote
Coz no-one has bothered to emulate old fx boxes except for the odd guitar pedal. Maybe lack of demand too. Virtual fx are imho pretty good by comparison to much hardware.
^ Joined: 27 Jul 2005  Member: #76240  Location: the wilds of wanny
ariston
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:48 am reply with quote
Permut8, The Drop, ERS Dimension D, the Uhbiks, Pitchfunk, quite a few reverbs, AA Big Rock Phaser, Brainworx & SPL stuff (although not all of it), Studio Devil Preamp...

...what were you saying again?
^ Joined: 28 Jun 2009  Member: #210358  Location: in a one-story town
electro
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:03 pm reply with quote
The UAD platform may be of interest to the OP.
http://www.uaudio.com/store.html
----
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM
^ Joined: 05 May 2002  Member: #2696  
resistent
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:29 pm reply with quote
Fred_Abstract wrote:
soundtoys stuff is decent when compared to good hardware but depends what you are after.


Soundtoys are for me one of the most overrated plugins.
----
LOVE*FIGHT*CREATE
-------------------------------------------
excusemyenglish
^ Joined: 14 Apr 2008  Member: #178388  Location: Berlin
resistent
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:31 pm reply with quote
ariston wrote:
Permut8, The Drop, ERS Dimension D, the Uhbiks, Pitchfunk, quite a few reverbs, AA Big Rock Phaser, Brainworx & SPL stuff (although not all of it), Studio Devil Preamp...

...what were you saying again?


Won't denied that some of these plugins are great (beside the brainworx stuff). The Drop could maybe be a really good one - time will tell.
----
LOVE*FIGHT*CREATE
-------------------------------------------
excusemyenglish
^ Joined: 14 Apr 2008  Member: #178388  Location: Berlin
resistent
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:32 pm reply with quote
electro wrote:
The UAD platform may be of interest to the OP.
http://www.uaudio.com/store.html


UAD sounds really cool but its not native. And also UAD dont always reach a good level.
----
LOVE*FIGHT*CREATE
-------------------------------------------
excusemyenglish
^ Joined: 14 Apr 2008  Member: #178388  Location: Berlin
Ch00rD
KVRist
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:39 pm reply with quote
As this seems to be a spin-off from another thread, where I answered the OP's question, please allow me to double-post my reply here as well (I'll be glad to remove it in that other thread, if that would be considered more appropriate):

resistent wrote:
Appendix: I wonder why there are fantastic close to hardware synths like Diva, UN-O-LX, etc. but no decent emulation of old effect hardware. I think a good sounding filter is hard to programm as well as a good pitchmodulation, or?

Maybe it's again capitalism. A synth sells better than a good filter emu or an bbd or and delay or a really good ringmodulator. The world seems to consists of (old boring subtractiv) Synths, eqs, compressor & channel emulation. A shame.


Edit: Maybe u-he changes again the game. With Sascha Eversmeier there is an outstanding fx-developer on board he has always good ideas an an imagination of how a fx has to work. Wait for the first plugins.

My answer to that would be, in one simple word: UAD.

For a 'good sounding filter', imho you have to look no further than the UAD Moog Multi-Mode Filter. Imho it can easily stand up to the Moog filter in Diva (and indeed, I've used it as such as well, routing Diva's oscillators through it), and its 'drive' may even make it sound better - subjectively, ymmv of course. In fact, that zero-delay feedback thing that contributes to the awesome sound of Diva's filter was implemented in UA's Moog plug-in a couple of years before u-he managed to pull off that trick.

So, imho, it's somewhat the other way around: while there were quite some really good software emulations of (analog) hardware effects, we used to have only a very few really good 'virtual analog' synth plug-ins before u-he "changed the game" with Diva.

Also, UA do not (yet!) have any synth plug-ins, while they are obviously making a lot of money (and have zero piracy, thanks to the custom DSP hardware used, it also effectively works somewhat like a 'dongle' protection). Which does make me doubt that the "capitalism" explanation submitted above is of much relevance here. I would counter that analog hardware gear and software emulations of such analog hardware are in general using sufficiently distinct technologies to warrant the presumption that having some sort of intellectual property on some analog technology (if it has not already expired, e.g. the infamous Moog filter patents) does not put the proprietor in any kind of position to block the development and marketing of any and all software emulations (except for usage of trade marks, but that is completely irrelevant to the sound).

As to pitch modulation, afaik it is usually done with digital means, and such effects could as such be released as software just as well, at least in theory - but in practice, perhaps the "capitalism" explanation does apply here, more generally, as it is still quite exceptional to see software versions of the exact same stuff that is (also) sold as hardware units, no matter if they are in the synth or effect category.

But, also, specifically to pitch shifting, some of the most popular hardware pitch shifting effects were produced by Eventide, and afaik some of its developers are now at SoundToys, and they're currently giving away a 'simple' pitch-shifting plug-in for free, which I bet is a teaser for a forthcoming more extensive pitch-shifting effect (like they did with Little Radiator at SXSW last year).

Bottom line: the quality of both effects and synths in software are continuously improved over time. Smile
^ Joined: 13 Dec 2011  Member: #270638  
Ch00rD
KVRist
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:48 pm reply with quote
resistent wrote:
electro wrote:
The UAD platform may be of interest to the OP.
http://www.uaudio.com/store.html


UAD sounds really cool but its not native. And also UAD dont always reach a good level.

Imho both observations are true, but not very relevant.

UA could probably release their algo's using 'native' code as well, but may have compelling reasons not to do so: they have zero piracy and lots of paying customers as it is. The fact remains that they have produced a number of emulations of (both analog and digital) hardware during the last decade.

(Some) UAD plug-ins may perhaps not be as good as the hardware they emulate, by whatever standard you choose to measure that, but the relevant question is whether such a discrepancy is and/or has historically been significantly greater for emulation of effects than synths, in particular for analog gear. I don't think it is / has been, generally speaking. YMMV, of course.
^ Joined: 13 Dec 2011  Member: #270638  
whyterabbyt
Beware the Quoth
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:50 am reply with quote
would be nice to have a day go by without yet another thread flogging this particular equine corpse, just for a change.
----
To laymen, software development is something akin to wizardry. Neither time, nor effort are involved. If software is missing features they want, or has bugs, it is solely because someone has been too lazy to wave their magic wand.
^ Joined: 03 Sep 2001  Member: #1041  
ZenPunkHippy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
- www
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:01 am reply with quote
Pic or it didn't happen ...

^ Joined: 18 Jun 2008  Member: #183136  Location: Melbourne, Australia
AKJ
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:26 am reply with quote
it's rather the other way round.
^ Joined: 01 Mar 2004  Member: #14851  
kmonkey
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:32 am reply with quote
Ch00rD wrote:
In fact, that zero-delay feedback thing that contributes to the awesome sound of Diva's filter was implemented in UA's Moog plug-in a couple of years before u-he managed to pull off that trick.



I am curious on how can you claim that about UAD implementing zero delay in their Moog filter? Never heard it before.

You do realize that whore "zero delay filter" idea was way before even uad moog filter?
^ Joined: 16 Aug 2004  Member: #37337  
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Printable version
Page 1 of 7
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Display posts from previous:   
ReplyNew TopicPrevious TopicNext Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Username: Password:  
KVR Developer Challenge 2012