Plug-ins, Hosts, Apps,
Hardware, Soundware
Developers
(Brands)
Videos Groups
Whats's in?
Banks & Patches
Download & Upload
Music Search
KVR
   
KVR Forum » Effects
Thread Read
Native Instruments Reverb Classics (RC24 & RC48)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
keel
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:38 am reply with quote
24 is really, really good. One of the best reverb there. It's sound just like I want reverb to sound. Truly awesome. Great work softube / NI. Well Done
^ Joined: 27 Oct 2004  Member: #45911  Location: Inside the kick drum
miedex
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:47 am reply with quote
Not sure I'm liking what the 24 does to get its stereo image. I noticed a little extra high end sparkle coming in on the right side so I started crossfading between L/R and it seems kind of a funky.
----
miedex
^ Joined: 01 May 2011  Member: #255796  
Cimbasso
KVRist
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:29 am reply with quote
@midnight wrote:
Shangsean wrote:
It's probably very good, but when I can get B2 for a similar price, it's not so enticing.


Does B2 even have anything to do with the classic Lexicon sound...?


Also, B2 is like 10 times heavier on the CPU than RC 24/48 and Valhalla and PCM etc.

Well, I must admit that I didn't expect much after listening to those dreadful demos on the NI site. But they are pretty great and since I'm mainly working with scoring stuff, I prefer 48. Great GUI, natural, transparent sound. As good as Relab's plugin is..and much cheaper + doesn't require damn iLok.
^ Joined: 22 May 2012  Member: #280857  
Giusmex
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:03 am reply with quote
i really like how they sound; but they simply cost too much;


ill wait for the 50% discount period
^ Joined: 20 Mar 2010  Member: #228211  
Galbanum
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:07 am reply with quote
@midnight wrote:
Shangsean wrote:
It's probably very good, but when I can get B2 for a similar price, it's not so enticing.


Does B2 even have anything to do with the classic Lexicon sound...?


Thankfully no. Smile Not that I see anything wrong with "the lexicon sound" but the way I see it is if you want "the lexicon sound" you have about a billion options now. If you want the 2CAudio sound, you have only one... Very Happy

Back in the "glory days" a studio might have a 480 and TC System 6000 and an Eventide 8000 etc. Today you can choose any one of the plethora of good Lex clones (or Lexicon itself), and a 2CAudio verb or two of your choice and cover a lot of ground...
----
Andrew Souter
____________________________
2CAudio | www.2CAudio.com
Galbanum | www.galbanum.com

Last edited by Galbanum on Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:33 am; edited 2 times in total
^ Joined: 12 Sep 2008  Member: #189147  
Galbanum
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:15 am reply with quote
Cimbasso wrote:

Also, B2 is like 10 times heavier on the CPU than RC 24/48 and Valhalla and PCM etc.



Can be, true. Depends on the preset. Lowest CPU usage preset compared to highest might be approaching a factor of 1:200! Lowest will be below these other products (but lowest CPU usage presets are more geared towards delay FXs in our case). Highest will be MUCH higher, as you state. Average preset will be higher, agreed.

Our algs are simply more complex than the "nested allpass loop" structure used by Lex and clones. We use a modern approach, and achieve completely artifact-free behavior which remains uncommon even now based on my recent analysis...
----
Andrew Souter
____________________________
2CAudio | www.2CAudio.com
Galbanum | www.galbanum.com

Last edited by Galbanum on Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:19 am; edited 1 time in total
^ Joined: 12 Sep 2008  Member: #189147  
4damind
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:18 am reply with quote
Galbanum wrote:
We use a modern approach, and achieve completely artifact-free behavior which remains uncommon even now based on my recent analysis...

Would you say this is also true with the newest reverbs eg. from Exponential Audio?
----
Frank Arnold
Musician & IT Freelancer
Reverbnation | Soundcloud | Web
^ Joined: 17 Aug 2004  Member: #37375  Location: Berlin, Germany
Galbanum
KVRian
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:27 am reply with quote
4damind wrote:
Galbanum wrote:
We use a modern approach, and achieve completely artifact-free behavior which remains uncommon even now based on my recent analysis...

Would you say this is also true with the newest reverbs eg. from Exponential Audio?


I would rather not talk about other company's specific products out of respect for them and general politeness given my understanding of the tremendous amount of work that goes into bringing a reverb plug-in to market...

Many of the recent products have some cool design features. It's a cool time for reverbs in general.
----
Andrew Souter
____________________________
2CAudio | www.2CAudio.com
Galbanum | www.galbanum.com
^ Joined: 12 Sep 2008  Member: #189147  
xerxes[no]
KVRist
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:21 am reply with quote
Galbanum wrote:
4damind wrote:
Galbanum wrote:
We use a modern approach, and achieve completely artifact-free behavior which remains uncommon even now based on my recent analysis...

Would you say this is also true with the newest reverbs eg. from Exponential Audio?


I would rather not talk about other company's specific products out of respect for them and general politeness given my understanding of the tremendous amount of work that goes into bringing a reverb plug-in to market...

Many of the recent products have some cool design features. It's a cool time for reverbs in general.


Indeed it is! I really do love my Aether.. and B2 also. And I like the Valhalla plugs also. But I did not own any of the other Lex specific plugins, and I am really really loving the sound of these two badboys. I know this is really dumb to say because I wake up with far too much gas often.. but I feel pretty much covered as far as reverbs go now. Smile

Good work Softtube and NI!
^ Joined: 13 May 2006  Member: #107311  
sergiofrias
KVRist
- profile
- pm
- e-mail
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:21 pm reply with quote
Here is a little tip to emulate the exact frequency response of the original Lexicon 224 with valhalla vintageverb (or any other reverb emulation plugin).
As you probably know, the audio bandwidth of the original 224 was around 8kHz (due to 20kHz sampling rate).after analyzing the NI RC 24 with voxengo spam,i found out that the bandwith was at 8.2 khz ,valhalla vintageverb is at 11.2 khz,so to emulate that response just use voxengo curveEQ or any other eq with a hard cutoff (as shown in the image below)at 8.2 khz.

My audio tests (after carefully placing the freq. crossovers and decay times at the low/medium/high frequencies) between valhalla vintageverb (bright hall algo.)and NI RC 24 (hall algo.)was almost identical. Smile

----
...want to know how to program great synth sounds,check my video tutorials: http://www.youtube.com/user/sergiofrias25
^ Joined: 21 May 2009  Member: #207870  Location: Portugal,Azores (faial island)
hibidy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:35 pm reply with quote
Well VVV doesn't exactly suck Laughing

I don't know, I really have no need for verbs other than to make huge overthetop guitar mega 80's sounds to play the same 3 chords over, but man, these are absolutely fantastic for that! Wheeeeeee
^ Joined: 20 Dec 2005  Member: #91716  
TheoM
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:42 pm reply with quote
ok these sounds stunning. Will not go much more into it, but they are highly on my list.
----
Please call me Theo.
^ Joined: 04 Sep 2001  Member: #1049  Location: Melbourne Australia
valhallasound
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
- www
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:04 pm reply with quote
sergiofrias wrote:
Here is a little tip to emulate the exact frequency response of the original Lexicon 224 with valhalla vintageverb (or any other reverb emulation plugin).
As you probably know, the audio bandwidth of the original 224 was around 8kHz (due to 20kHz sampling rate).after analyzing the NI RC 24 with voxengo spam,i found out that the bandwith was at 8.2 khz ,valhalla vintageverb is at 11.2 khz,so to emulate that response just use voxengo curveEQ or any other eq with a hard cutoff (as shown in the image below)at 8.2 khz.

My audio tests (after carefully placing the freq. crossovers and decay times at the low/medium/high frequencies) between valhalla vintageverb (bright hall algo.)and NI RC 24 (hall algo.)was almost identical. Smile



Interesting. To say the least. Very Happy

Sean Costello
^ Joined: 14 Nov 2006  Member: #128465  Location: Pacific NW
Liero
KVRian
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:24 pm reply with quote
sergiofrias wrote:
... was almost identical. Smile


Can you please put this into more quantifiable language? To what dbFS level does a comparison signal null?

I ask because I've noticed that there are people here who can't hear a difference between... well, anything. Smile

EDIT = Just by quickly testing this by ear, I can't get VVV to sound anywhere near "identical" to the RC24.
Last edited by Liero on Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
^ Joined: 06 Mar 2004  Member: #15686  
hibidy
KVRAF
- profile
- pm
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:27 pm reply with quote
I was wondering when this was going to happen and now it's going to take the fun out demoing these Laughing Someone is going to come up with all the down things about them "technically" instead of the joy of just listening to them HiHi
^ Joined: 20 Dec 2005  Member: #91716  
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Printable version
Page 5 of 8
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Display posts from previous:   
ReplyNew TopicPrevious TopicNext Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Username: Password:  
KVR Developer Challenge 2012