|
|||
I'd love to hear audio comparison done with VeeThree, LC 24/48, PCM and LX480. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 May 2012 Member: #280857 | ||
|
|||
Over at GS, Casey Dowdell from Bricasti referred to these as "spot on" including the modulation on the 24. That's as good as any endorsement can get for me. The ANAL-yzer nurds can just play with their research and data tools. I'll be making music with ALL of these great tools; Valhalla, Relab, NI. Last edited by Seaside Music on Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:06 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Member: #86536 | ||
|
|||
Liero wrote: sergiofrias wrote: ... was almost identical.
Can you please put this into more quantifiable language? To what dbFS level does a comparison signal null? I ask because I've noticed that there are people here who can't hear a difference between... well, anything. EDIT = Just by quickly testing this by ear, I can't get VVV to sound anywhere near "identical" to the RC24. to be completely identical the algorithm would have to be the same,(same early reflections,or late reflections,decay time,same crossover slopes etc)... for this test i disabled the early reflection on Valhalla,and used the voxengo curveEQ (as i described on my previous post) Hear the test on soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/sergiofrias/valhalla-vs-rc-24 ---- ...want to know how to program great synth sounds,check my video tutorials: http://www.youtube.com/user/sergiofrias25 |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 21 May 2009 Member: #207870 Location: Portugal,Azores (faial island) | ||
|
|||
Why didn't they put the Plate algorithms? ---- Has anybody ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Apr 2011 Member: #255222 Location: The House of Zaid | ||
|
|||
So now I'm at the stage where I'm just kinda randomly a/b'ing and so far the conclusion is WANT! But, what keep telling myself is why when VVV sounds great and it's paid for I think I'm going to sell room though to help fund this. Not selling VVV.......yet |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
I've been AB'ing against the lexicon native's (which are cheaper now) and am not that impressed with the NI offerings, particularly the RC48 doesn't sound as "rich" to me as the LXP hall which I have... |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 Mar 2004 Member: #15686 | ||
|
|||
Yeah, but no dongle!
I'll never try any of those ilok2 verbs so I'm stuck with native city. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
Liero wrote: I've been AB'ing against the lexicon native's (which are cheaper now) and am not that impressed with the NI offerings, particularly the RC48 doesn't sound as "rich" to me as the LXP hall which I have...
Agreed. But, of course, the RC48 is a 480L emulation and therefore based on 1986 algorithms. The LXP and PCM are based on their more modern algs, and enjoy almost 30 years of technical improvements. So, it's most likely the 480L we're not as impressed with. Actually, when you consider how old the 480L is, it's pretty impressive that it holds up as well as it does to Lexicon's current flagship products. They kinda nailed it. But yeah, I agree. I compared the the PCM Native Random Hall Large to the RC48's and the PCM is much more 3d, lively and full of subtle motion. That said, I think the RC48 has just about as much "lushness" and smoothness going for it. I'd be interested to hear a shootout between the RC48, 480LX and a real 480L. I think I still want a 480L and even a 224 emulation for times where more 2d might be desirable. I've got some theories I'm going to be putting to the test, regarding that. Not sure yet. Last edited by jalcide on Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:18 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 14 Sep 2007 Member: #160040 Location: Minneapolis | ||
|
|||
don't worry hibidy the NI ones sound just as good as LXP in fact they are bigger and richer.. they are different.. they are specific emulations, lxp largely isn't. ---- Please call me Theo. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 04 Sep 2001 Member: #1049 Location: Melbourne Australia | ||
|
|||
hibidy wrote: So now I'm at the stage where I'm just kinda randomly a/b'ing and so far the conclusion is WANT! But, what keep telling myself is why when VVV sounds great and it's paid for
I think I'm going to sell room though to help fund this. Not selling VVV.......yet It's better hibidy? Seriously? ValhallaDSP makes some amazing plug-ins. Good CPU use, awesome UI, extremely generous price... Are you a reverb aficionado? |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 06 Apr 2003 Member: #6631 Location: South Lyon, MI USA | ||
|
|||
grymmjack wrote: hibidy wrote: So now I'm at the stage where I'm just kinda randomly a/b'ing and so far the conclusion is WANT! But, what keep telling myself is why when VVV sounds great and it's paid for
I think I'm going to sell room though to help fund this. Not selling VVV.......yet It's better hibidy? Seriously? ValhallaDSP makes some amazing plug-ins. Good CPU use, awesome UI, extremely generous price... Are you a reverb aficionado? Don't get me wrong, there is NOTHING wrong with valhalla stuff! Here's what I've noticed. What putting these two on a buss and playing guitar (which I do more than anything else, poorly, but that is what I do the most Now, I don't use dongles, and don't have access to some of those other highly coveted verbs. But there is something about these that are instantly credible to my ears. I dunno, I'm still going to test these out a while (there is no hurry, no special offer or anything) but so far it's really enjoyable to my ears. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
I was not impressed by these at all, VintageVerb blows these away. ---- Analog synth or plugin? The elitists go silent when a blind test is involved. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Jul 2004 Member: #33882 Location: Boston | ||
|
|||
djanthonyw wrote: I was not impressed by these at all, VintageVerb blows these away. Agreed. I was going to be post that these are just over priced. They sound good but for the price the Vahalla and CSR lines are better bang for your buck imo. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 27 Dec 2011 Member: #271594 Location: Seattle | ||
|
|||
TheoM wrote: don't worry hibidy the NI ones sound just as good as LXP in fact they are bigger and richer.. they are different.. they are specific emulations, lxp largely isn't.
Yeah, I feel the two are TOTALLY different. But really good in their own way. @480 (older): Interesting because to my ears, it has the "wider" more "now" sound Ugggggggggg, everyone is different |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 | ||
|
|||
djanthonyw wrote: I was not impressed by these at all, VintageVerb blows these away.
I wish I felt that way EDIT: not that I don't feel VVV doesn't hold it's own, but blown away is not how I feel at all. Could it be levels? You know that these have an options tab with in/out volume right? I've noticed that depending on what the settings are the NI's have to be "fed" more to be at the volume level most VVV settings are. |
|||
| ^ | Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Member: #91716 |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group







